Cargando…
Corporate Counterspeech
Are corporations ever morally obligated to engage in counterspeech—that is, in speech that aims to counter hate speech and misinformation? While existing arguments in moral and political philosophy show that individuals and states have such obligations, it is an open question whether those arguments...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10332-6 |
| _version_ | 1784823206123667456 |
|---|---|
| author | Ancell, Aaron |
| author_facet | Ancell, Aaron |
| author_sort | Ancell, Aaron |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | Are corporations ever morally obligated to engage in counterspeech—that is, in speech that aims to counter hate speech and misinformation? While existing arguments in moral and political philosophy show that individuals and states have such obligations, it is an open question whether those arguments apply to corporations as well. In this essay, I show how two such arguments—one based on avoiding complicity, and one based on duties of rescue—can plausibly be extended to corporations. I also respond to several objections to corporate counterspeech. |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-9628497 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | Springer Netherlands |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-96284972022-11-02 Corporate Counterspeech Ancell, Aaron Ethical Theory Moral Pract Article Are corporations ever morally obligated to engage in counterspeech—that is, in speech that aims to counter hate speech and misinformation? While existing arguments in moral and political philosophy show that individuals and states have such obligations, it is an open question whether those arguments apply to corporations as well. In this essay, I show how two such arguments—one based on avoiding complicity, and one based on duties of rescue—can plausibly be extended to corporations. I also respond to several objections to corporate counterspeech. Springer Netherlands 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9628497/ /pubmed/36339916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10332-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
| spellingShingle | Article Ancell, Aaron Corporate Counterspeech |
| title | Corporate Counterspeech |
| title_full | Corporate Counterspeech |
| title_fullStr | Corporate Counterspeech |
| title_full_unstemmed | Corporate Counterspeech |
| title_short | Corporate Counterspeech |
| title_sort | corporate counterspeech |
| topic | Article |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10332-6 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ancellaaron corporatecounterspeech |