Cargando…

Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate total and incident mesh exposure rates at least 2 years after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Secondary aims were to evaluate surgical success and late adverse events. METHODS: This extension study included women pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthews, Catherine A., Myers, Erinn M., Henley, Barbara R., Kenton, Kimberly, Weaver, Erica, Wu, Jennifer M., Geller, Elizabeth J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05388-y
_version_ 1784823231803293696
author Matthews, Catherine A.
Myers, Erinn M.
Henley, Barbara R.
Kenton, Kimberly
Weaver, Erica
Wu, Jennifer M.
Geller, Elizabeth J.
author_facet Matthews, Catherine A.
Myers, Erinn M.
Henley, Barbara R.
Kenton, Kimberly
Weaver, Erica
Wu, Jennifer M.
Geller, Elizabeth J.
author_sort Matthews, Catherine A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate total and incident mesh exposure rates at least 2 years after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Secondary aims were to evaluate surgical success and late adverse events. METHODS: This extension study included women previously enrolled in the multicenter randomized trial of permanent vs delayed-absorbable suture with lightweight mesh for > stage II uterovaginal prolapse. Owing to COVID-19, women were given the option of an in-person (questionnaires and examination) or telephone visit (questionnaires only). The primary outcome was total and incident suture or mesh exposure, or symptoms suggestive of mesh exposure in women without an examination. Secondary outcomes were surgical success, which was defined as no subjective bulge, no prolapse beyond the hymen, and no pelvic organ prolapse retreatment, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 182 out of 200 previously randomized participants were eligible for inclusion, of whom 106 (58%) women (78 in-person and 28 via questionnaire only) agreed to the extension study. At a mean of 3.9 years post-surgery, the rate of mesh or suture exposure was 7.7% (14 out of 182) of whom only 2 were incident cases reported after 1-year follow-up. None reported vaginal bleeding or discharge, dyspareunia, or penile dyspareunia. Surgical success was 93 out of 106 (87.7%): 13 out of 94 (13.8%) failed by bulge symptoms, 2 out of 78 (2.6%) by prolapse beyond the hymen, 1 out of 85 (1.2%) by retreatment with pessary, and 0 by retreatment with surgery. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of incident mesh exposure between 1 and 3.9 years post-surgery was low, success rates remained high, and there were no delayed serious adverse events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9628638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96286382022-11-02 Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy Matthews, Catherine A. Myers, Erinn M. Henley, Barbara R. Kenton, Kimberly Weaver, Erica Wu, Jennifer M. Geller, Elizabeth J. Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate total and incident mesh exposure rates at least 2 years after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Secondary aims were to evaluate surgical success and late adverse events. METHODS: This extension study included women previously enrolled in the multicenter randomized trial of permanent vs delayed-absorbable suture with lightweight mesh for > stage II uterovaginal prolapse. Owing to COVID-19, women were given the option of an in-person (questionnaires and examination) or telephone visit (questionnaires only). The primary outcome was total and incident suture or mesh exposure, or symptoms suggestive of mesh exposure in women without an examination. Secondary outcomes were surgical success, which was defined as no subjective bulge, no prolapse beyond the hymen, and no pelvic organ prolapse retreatment, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 182 out of 200 previously randomized participants were eligible for inclusion, of whom 106 (58%) women (78 in-person and 28 via questionnaire only) agreed to the extension study. At a mean of 3.9 years post-surgery, the rate of mesh or suture exposure was 7.7% (14 out of 182) of whom only 2 were incident cases reported after 1-year follow-up. None reported vaginal bleeding or discharge, dyspareunia, or penile dyspareunia. Surgical success was 93 out of 106 (87.7%): 13 out of 94 (13.8%) failed by bulge symptoms, 2 out of 78 (2.6%) by prolapse beyond the hymen, 1 out of 85 (1.2%) by retreatment with pessary, and 0 by retreatment with surgery. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of incident mesh exposure between 1 and 3.9 years post-surgery was low, success rates remained high, and there were no delayed serious adverse events. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9628638/ /pubmed/36322173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05388-y Text en © The International Urogynecological Association 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Matthews, Catherine A.
Myers, Erinn M.
Henley, Barbara R.
Kenton, Kimberly
Weaver, Erica
Wu, Jennifer M.
Geller, Elizabeth J.
Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy
title Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy
title_full Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy
title_fullStr Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy
title_full_unstemmed Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy
title_short Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy
title_sort long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05388-y
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewscatherinea longtermmeshexposureafterminimallyinvasivetotalhysterectomyandsacrocolpopexy
AT myerserinnm longtermmeshexposureafterminimallyinvasivetotalhysterectomyandsacrocolpopexy
AT henleybarbarar longtermmeshexposureafterminimallyinvasivetotalhysterectomyandsacrocolpopexy
AT kentonkimberly longtermmeshexposureafterminimallyinvasivetotalhysterectomyandsacrocolpopexy
AT weavererica longtermmeshexposureafterminimallyinvasivetotalhysterectomyandsacrocolpopexy
AT wujenniferm longtermmeshexposureafterminimallyinvasivetotalhysterectomyandsacrocolpopexy
AT gellerelizabethj longtermmeshexposureafterminimallyinvasivetotalhysterectomyandsacrocolpopexy