Cargando…

Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765)

INTRODUCTION: The only curative treatment for most gastric cancer is radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (LAD). Minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MIG) aims to reduce postoperative morbidity, but its use has not yet been widely established in Western countries. Minimally invasivE versus o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nickel, Felix, Studier-Fischer, Alexander, Hausmann, David, Klotz, Rosa, Vogel-Adigozalov, Sophia Lara, Tenckhoff, Solveig, Klose, Christina, Feisst, Manuel, Zimmermann, Samuel, Babic, Benjamin, Berlt, Felix, Bruns, Christiane, Gockel, Ines, Graf, Sandra, Grimminger, Peter, Gutschow, Christian A, Hoeppner, Jens, Ludwig, Kaja, Mirow, Lutz, Mönig, Stefan, Reim, Daniel, Seyfried, Florian, Stange, Daniel, Billeter, Adrian, Nienhüser, Henrik, Probst, Pascal, Schmidt, Thomas, Müller-Stich, Beat Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064286
_version_ 1784823233387692032
author Nickel, Felix
Studier-Fischer, Alexander
Hausmann, David
Klotz, Rosa
Vogel-Adigozalov, Sophia Lara
Tenckhoff, Solveig
Klose, Christina
Feisst, Manuel
Zimmermann, Samuel
Babic, Benjamin
Berlt, Felix
Bruns, Christiane
Gockel, Ines
Graf, Sandra
Grimminger, Peter
Gutschow, Christian A
Hoeppner, Jens
Ludwig, Kaja
Mirow, Lutz
Mönig, Stefan
Reim, Daniel
Seyfried, Florian
Stange, Daniel
Billeter, Adrian
Nienhüser, Henrik
Probst, Pascal
Schmidt, Thomas
Müller-Stich, Beat Peter
author_facet Nickel, Felix
Studier-Fischer, Alexander
Hausmann, David
Klotz, Rosa
Vogel-Adigozalov, Sophia Lara
Tenckhoff, Solveig
Klose, Christina
Feisst, Manuel
Zimmermann, Samuel
Babic, Benjamin
Berlt, Felix
Bruns, Christiane
Gockel, Ines
Graf, Sandra
Grimminger, Peter
Gutschow, Christian A
Hoeppner, Jens
Ludwig, Kaja
Mirow, Lutz
Mönig, Stefan
Reim, Daniel
Seyfried, Florian
Stange, Daniel
Billeter, Adrian
Nienhüser, Henrik
Probst, Pascal
Schmidt, Thomas
Müller-Stich, Beat Peter
author_sort Nickel, Felix
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The only curative treatment for most gastric cancer is radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (LAD). Minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MIG) aims to reduce postoperative morbidity, but its use has not yet been widely established in Western countries. Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy is the first Western multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare postoperative morbidity following MIG vs open total gastrectomy (OG). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This superiority multicentre RCT compares MIG (intervention) to OG (control) for oncological total gastrectomy with D2 or D2+LAD. Recruitment is expected to last for 2 years. Inclusion criteria comprise age between 18 and 84 years and planned total gastrectomy after initial diagnosis of gastric carcinoma. Exclusion criteria include Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >2, tumours requiring extended gastrectomy or less than total gastrectomy, previous abdominal surgery or extensive adhesions seriously complicating MIG, other active oncological disease, advanced stages (T4 or M1), emergency setting and pregnancy. The sample size was calculated at 80 participants per group. The primary endpoint is 30-day postoperative morbidity as measured by the Comprehensive Complications Index. Secondary endpoints include postoperative morbidity and mortality, adherence to a fast-track protocol and patient-reported quality of life (QoL) scores (QoR-15, EUROQOL EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D), EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-STO22, activities of daily living and Body Image Scale). Oncological endpoints include rate of R0 resection, lymph node yield, disease-free survival and overall survival at 60-month follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been received by the independent Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg (S-816/2021) and will be received from each responsible ethics committee for each individual participating centre prior to recruitment. Results will be published open access. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00025765.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9628650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96286502022-11-03 Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765) Nickel, Felix Studier-Fischer, Alexander Hausmann, David Klotz, Rosa Vogel-Adigozalov, Sophia Lara Tenckhoff, Solveig Klose, Christina Feisst, Manuel Zimmermann, Samuel Babic, Benjamin Berlt, Felix Bruns, Christiane Gockel, Ines Graf, Sandra Grimminger, Peter Gutschow, Christian A Hoeppner, Jens Ludwig, Kaja Mirow, Lutz Mönig, Stefan Reim, Daniel Seyfried, Florian Stange, Daniel Billeter, Adrian Nienhüser, Henrik Probst, Pascal Schmidt, Thomas Müller-Stich, Beat Peter BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: The only curative treatment for most gastric cancer is radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (LAD). Minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MIG) aims to reduce postoperative morbidity, but its use has not yet been widely established in Western countries. Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy is the first Western multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare postoperative morbidity following MIG vs open total gastrectomy (OG). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This superiority multicentre RCT compares MIG (intervention) to OG (control) for oncological total gastrectomy with D2 or D2+LAD. Recruitment is expected to last for 2 years. Inclusion criteria comprise age between 18 and 84 years and planned total gastrectomy after initial diagnosis of gastric carcinoma. Exclusion criteria include Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >2, tumours requiring extended gastrectomy or less than total gastrectomy, previous abdominal surgery or extensive adhesions seriously complicating MIG, other active oncological disease, advanced stages (T4 or M1), emergency setting and pregnancy. The sample size was calculated at 80 participants per group. The primary endpoint is 30-day postoperative morbidity as measured by the Comprehensive Complications Index. Secondary endpoints include postoperative morbidity and mortality, adherence to a fast-track protocol and patient-reported quality of life (QoL) scores (QoR-15, EUROQOL EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D), EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-STO22, activities of daily living and Body Image Scale). Oncological endpoints include rate of R0 resection, lymph node yield, disease-free survival and overall survival at 60-month follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been received by the independent Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg (S-816/2021) and will be received from each responsible ethics committee for each individual participating centre prior to recruitment. Results will be published open access. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00025765. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9628650/ /pubmed/36316075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064286 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Nickel, Felix
Studier-Fischer, Alexander
Hausmann, David
Klotz, Rosa
Vogel-Adigozalov, Sophia Lara
Tenckhoff, Solveig
Klose, Christina
Feisst, Manuel
Zimmermann, Samuel
Babic, Benjamin
Berlt, Felix
Bruns, Christiane
Gockel, Ines
Graf, Sandra
Grimminger, Peter
Gutschow, Christian A
Hoeppner, Jens
Ludwig, Kaja
Mirow, Lutz
Mönig, Stefan
Reim, Daniel
Seyfried, Florian
Stange, Daniel
Billeter, Adrian
Nienhüser, Henrik
Probst, Pascal
Schmidt, Thomas
Müller-Stich, Beat Peter
Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765)
title Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765)
title_full Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765)
title_fullStr Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765)
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765)
title_short Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765)
title_sort minimally invasive versus open total gastrectomy (mega): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (drks00025765)
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064286
work_keys_str_mv AT nickelfelix minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT studierfischeralexander minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT hausmanndavid minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT klotzrosa minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT vogeladigozalovsophialara minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT tenckhoffsolveig minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT klosechristina minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT feisstmanuel minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT zimmermannsamuel minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT babicbenjamin minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT berltfelix minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT brunschristiane minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT gockelines minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT grafsandra minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT grimmingerpeter minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT gutschowchristiana minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT hoeppnerjens minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT ludwigkaja minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT mirowlutz minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT monigstefan minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT reimdaniel minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT seyfriedflorian minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT stangedaniel minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT billeteradrian minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT nienhuserhenrik minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT probstpascal minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT schmidtthomas minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765
AT mullerstichbeatpeter minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765