Cargando…
Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765)
INTRODUCTION: The only curative treatment for most gastric cancer is radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (LAD). Minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MIG) aims to reduce postoperative morbidity, but its use has not yet been widely established in Western countries. Minimally invasivE versus o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064286 |
_version_ | 1784823233387692032 |
---|---|
author | Nickel, Felix Studier-Fischer, Alexander Hausmann, David Klotz, Rosa Vogel-Adigozalov, Sophia Lara Tenckhoff, Solveig Klose, Christina Feisst, Manuel Zimmermann, Samuel Babic, Benjamin Berlt, Felix Bruns, Christiane Gockel, Ines Graf, Sandra Grimminger, Peter Gutschow, Christian A Hoeppner, Jens Ludwig, Kaja Mirow, Lutz Mönig, Stefan Reim, Daniel Seyfried, Florian Stange, Daniel Billeter, Adrian Nienhüser, Henrik Probst, Pascal Schmidt, Thomas Müller-Stich, Beat Peter |
author_facet | Nickel, Felix Studier-Fischer, Alexander Hausmann, David Klotz, Rosa Vogel-Adigozalov, Sophia Lara Tenckhoff, Solveig Klose, Christina Feisst, Manuel Zimmermann, Samuel Babic, Benjamin Berlt, Felix Bruns, Christiane Gockel, Ines Graf, Sandra Grimminger, Peter Gutschow, Christian A Hoeppner, Jens Ludwig, Kaja Mirow, Lutz Mönig, Stefan Reim, Daniel Seyfried, Florian Stange, Daniel Billeter, Adrian Nienhüser, Henrik Probst, Pascal Schmidt, Thomas Müller-Stich, Beat Peter |
author_sort | Nickel, Felix |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The only curative treatment for most gastric cancer is radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (LAD). Minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MIG) aims to reduce postoperative morbidity, but its use has not yet been widely established in Western countries. Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy is the first Western multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare postoperative morbidity following MIG vs open total gastrectomy (OG). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This superiority multicentre RCT compares MIG (intervention) to OG (control) for oncological total gastrectomy with D2 or D2+LAD. Recruitment is expected to last for 2 years. Inclusion criteria comprise age between 18 and 84 years and planned total gastrectomy after initial diagnosis of gastric carcinoma. Exclusion criteria include Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >2, tumours requiring extended gastrectomy or less than total gastrectomy, previous abdominal surgery or extensive adhesions seriously complicating MIG, other active oncological disease, advanced stages (T4 or M1), emergency setting and pregnancy. The sample size was calculated at 80 participants per group. The primary endpoint is 30-day postoperative morbidity as measured by the Comprehensive Complications Index. Secondary endpoints include postoperative morbidity and mortality, adherence to a fast-track protocol and patient-reported quality of life (QoL) scores (QoR-15, EUROQOL EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D), EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-STO22, activities of daily living and Body Image Scale). Oncological endpoints include rate of R0 resection, lymph node yield, disease-free survival and overall survival at 60-month follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been received by the independent Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg (S-816/2021) and will be received from each responsible ethics committee for each individual participating centre prior to recruitment. Results will be published open access. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00025765. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9628650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96286502022-11-03 Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765) Nickel, Felix Studier-Fischer, Alexander Hausmann, David Klotz, Rosa Vogel-Adigozalov, Sophia Lara Tenckhoff, Solveig Klose, Christina Feisst, Manuel Zimmermann, Samuel Babic, Benjamin Berlt, Felix Bruns, Christiane Gockel, Ines Graf, Sandra Grimminger, Peter Gutschow, Christian A Hoeppner, Jens Ludwig, Kaja Mirow, Lutz Mönig, Stefan Reim, Daniel Seyfried, Florian Stange, Daniel Billeter, Adrian Nienhüser, Henrik Probst, Pascal Schmidt, Thomas Müller-Stich, Beat Peter BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: The only curative treatment for most gastric cancer is radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (LAD). Minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MIG) aims to reduce postoperative morbidity, but its use has not yet been widely established in Western countries. Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy is the first Western multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare postoperative morbidity following MIG vs open total gastrectomy (OG). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This superiority multicentre RCT compares MIG (intervention) to OG (control) for oncological total gastrectomy with D2 or D2+LAD. Recruitment is expected to last for 2 years. Inclusion criteria comprise age between 18 and 84 years and planned total gastrectomy after initial diagnosis of gastric carcinoma. Exclusion criteria include Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >2, tumours requiring extended gastrectomy or less than total gastrectomy, previous abdominal surgery or extensive adhesions seriously complicating MIG, other active oncological disease, advanced stages (T4 or M1), emergency setting and pregnancy. The sample size was calculated at 80 participants per group. The primary endpoint is 30-day postoperative morbidity as measured by the Comprehensive Complications Index. Secondary endpoints include postoperative morbidity and mortality, adherence to a fast-track protocol and patient-reported quality of life (QoL) scores (QoR-15, EUROQOL EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D), EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-STO22, activities of daily living and Body Image Scale). Oncological endpoints include rate of R0 resection, lymph node yield, disease-free survival and overall survival at 60-month follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been received by the independent Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg (S-816/2021) and will be received from each responsible ethics committee for each individual participating centre prior to recruitment. Results will be published open access. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00025765. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9628650/ /pubmed/36316075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064286 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Surgery Nickel, Felix Studier-Fischer, Alexander Hausmann, David Klotz, Rosa Vogel-Adigozalov, Sophia Lara Tenckhoff, Solveig Klose, Christina Feisst, Manuel Zimmermann, Samuel Babic, Benjamin Berlt, Felix Bruns, Christiane Gockel, Ines Graf, Sandra Grimminger, Peter Gutschow, Christian A Hoeppner, Jens Ludwig, Kaja Mirow, Lutz Mönig, Stefan Reim, Daniel Seyfried, Florian Stange, Daniel Billeter, Adrian Nienhüser, Henrik Probst, Pascal Schmidt, Thomas Müller-Stich, Beat Peter Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765) |
title | Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765) |
title_full | Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765) |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765) |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765) |
title_short | Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765) |
title_sort | minimally invasive versus open total gastrectomy (mega): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (drks00025765) |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nickelfelix minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT studierfischeralexander minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT hausmanndavid minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT klotzrosa minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT vogeladigozalovsophialara minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT tenckhoffsolveig minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT klosechristina minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT feisstmanuel minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT zimmermannsamuel minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT babicbenjamin minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT berltfelix minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT brunschristiane minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT gockelines minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT grafsandra minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT grimmingerpeter minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT gutschowchristiana minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT hoeppnerjens minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT ludwigkaja minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT mirowlutz minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT monigstefan minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT reimdaniel minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT seyfriedflorian minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT stangedaniel minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT billeteradrian minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT nienhuserhenrik minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT probstpascal minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT schmidtthomas minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 AT mullerstichbeatpeter minimallyinvasiveversusopentotalgastrectomymegastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialdrks00025765 |