Cargando…

Diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer after negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

INTRODUCTION: The diagnostic pathway after a negative magnetic resonance imaging (nMRI) exam is not clearly defined. The aim of the present study is to define the risk of prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) at the prostate biopsy after a negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) exam. MA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zattoni, Fabio, Morlacco, Alessandro, Soligo, Matteo, Mancini, Mariangela, Leone, Nicolò, Zecchini, Giovanni, Reitano, Giuseppe, Bednarova, Iliana, Lacognata, Carmelo Salvino, Lauro, Alberto, Zanovello, Nicola, Novara, Giacomo, dal Moro, Fabrizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36381166
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2022.0092
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The diagnostic pathway after a negative magnetic resonance imaging (nMRI) exam is not clearly defined. The aim of the present study is to define the risk of prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) at the prostate biopsy after a negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) exam. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with nMRI Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) ≤2 and without a previous diagnosis of PCa were identified among all patients undergoing mpMRI in a single referral center between 01/2016-12/2019. Detailed data about prostate biopsy after nMRI were collected, including any PCa diagnosis and clinically significant PCa diagnosis. [Gleason score (GS) ≥7]. In addition to descriptive statistics, uni and multivariable logistic regression assessed the potential predictors of any PCa and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) at the biopsy after a negative mpMRI. RESULTS: Of 410 patients with nMRI, 73 underwent saturation biopsy. Only prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were significantly higher in patients undergoing biopsy (5.2 ng/ml vs 6.4, p <0.001), while Prostate Cancer Research Foundation (SWOP – Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Prostaatkanker) risk score and other variables did not differ. A total of 22 biopsies (30.1%) were positive for PCa, GS 6 was diagnosed in 14 patients, GS 7 in 3, GS 8 in 1 and GS 9–10 in 4. csPCa was found in 8 (11%) patients. No significant predictors of any PCa or csPCa were identified at multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the good negative predictive value of mpMRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, 11% of the patients had csPCa. Specific predictive models addressing this setting would be useful.