Cargando…
Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
PURPOSE: To compare stereopsis and visual acuity (VA) between bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL with a bifocal IOL. METHODS: This is a non-randomized, prospective comparative study included 74 eyes of 37 pati...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9629615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36341263 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1042101 |
_version_ | 1784823435438850048 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Meiyi Fan, Wei Zhang, Guangbin |
author_facet | Zhu, Meiyi Fan, Wei Zhang, Guangbin |
author_sort | Zhu, Meiyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare stereopsis and visual acuity (VA) between bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL with a bifocal IOL. METHODS: This is a non-randomized, prospective comparative study included 74 eyes of 37 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and bilateral implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP IOL (bilateral group; 21 patients) or blended implantation of Tecnis Symfony ZXR00 and Tecnis ZLB00 IOL (blended group; 16 patients). The primary outcomes were stereoacuity and binocular VA. The secondary outcomes were visual defocus curve, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Follow-up was performed 3 months after the surgery. RESULTS: The mean near stereoacuity was 49.76 ± 22.67 and 120.63 ± 90.94 seconds of arc (arcsec) in the bilateral and blended groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Near stereoacuity was positively correlated with VA difference of two eyes (r = 0.896, P < 0.001). The mean binocular uncorrected visual acuity at 40 cm, 80 cm, 5 m, and corrected distance visual acuity at 5 m of the bilateral and blended groups was not statistically significant different. The bilateral group had better VA at a vergence from −2.5 to −4.0 D. Both groups obtained high quality of life and patient satisfaction scores. CONCLUSION: The bilateral and blended groups achieved good binocular VA, quality of life, and high patient satisfaction. However, the near stereoacuity of the blended group was worse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9629615 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96296152022-11-03 Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses Zhu, Meiyi Fan, Wei Zhang, Guangbin Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: To compare stereopsis and visual acuity (VA) between bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL with a bifocal IOL. METHODS: This is a non-randomized, prospective comparative study included 74 eyes of 37 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and bilateral implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP IOL (bilateral group; 21 patients) or blended implantation of Tecnis Symfony ZXR00 and Tecnis ZLB00 IOL (blended group; 16 patients). The primary outcomes were stereoacuity and binocular VA. The secondary outcomes were visual defocus curve, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Follow-up was performed 3 months after the surgery. RESULTS: The mean near stereoacuity was 49.76 ± 22.67 and 120.63 ± 90.94 seconds of arc (arcsec) in the bilateral and blended groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Near stereoacuity was positively correlated with VA difference of two eyes (r = 0.896, P < 0.001). The mean binocular uncorrected visual acuity at 40 cm, 80 cm, 5 m, and corrected distance visual acuity at 5 m of the bilateral and blended groups was not statistically significant different. The bilateral group had better VA at a vergence from −2.5 to −4.0 D. Both groups obtained high quality of life and patient satisfaction scores. CONCLUSION: The bilateral and blended groups achieved good binocular VA, quality of life, and high patient satisfaction. However, the near stereoacuity of the blended group was worse. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9629615/ /pubmed/36341263 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1042101 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhu, Fan and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Zhu, Meiyi Fan, Wei Zhang, Guangbin Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses |
title | Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses |
title_full | Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses |
title_fullStr | Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses |
title_full_unstemmed | Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses |
title_short | Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses |
title_sort | stereopsis and visual acuity: bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9629615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36341263 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1042101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhumeiyi stereopsisandvisualacuitybilateraltrifocalversusblendedextendeddepthoffocusanddiffractivebifocalintraocularlenses AT fanwei stereopsisandvisualacuitybilateraltrifocalversusblendedextendeddepthoffocusanddiffractivebifocalintraocularlenses AT zhangguangbin stereopsisandvisualacuitybilateraltrifocalversusblendedextendeddepthoffocusanddiffractivebifocalintraocularlenses |