Cargando…

Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To compare stereopsis and visual acuity (VA) between bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL with a bifocal IOL. METHODS: This is a non-randomized, prospective comparative study included 74 eyes of 37 pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Meiyi, Fan, Wei, Zhang, Guangbin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9629615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36341263
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1042101
_version_ 1784823435438850048
author Zhu, Meiyi
Fan, Wei
Zhang, Guangbin
author_facet Zhu, Meiyi
Fan, Wei
Zhang, Guangbin
author_sort Zhu, Meiyi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare stereopsis and visual acuity (VA) between bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL with a bifocal IOL. METHODS: This is a non-randomized, prospective comparative study included 74 eyes of 37 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and bilateral implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP IOL (bilateral group; 21 patients) or blended implantation of Tecnis Symfony ZXR00 and Tecnis ZLB00 IOL (blended group; 16 patients). The primary outcomes were stereoacuity and binocular VA. The secondary outcomes were visual defocus curve, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Follow-up was performed 3 months after the surgery. RESULTS: The mean near stereoacuity was 49.76 ± 22.67 and 120.63 ± 90.94 seconds of arc (arcsec) in the bilateral and blended groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Near stereoacuity was positively correlated with VA difference of two eyes (r = 0.896, P < 0.001). The mean binocular uncorrected visual acuity at 40 cm, 80 cm, 5 m, and corrected distance visual acuity at 5 m of the bilateral and blended groups was not statistically significant different. The bilateral group had better VA at a vergence from −2.5 to −4.0 D. Both groups obtained high quality of life and patient satisfaction scores. CONCLUSION: The bilateral and blended groups achieved good binocular VA, quality of life, and high patient satisfaction. However, the near stereoacuity of the blended group was worse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9629615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96296152022-11-03 Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses Zhu, Meiyi Fan, Wei Zhang, Guangbin Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: To compare stereopsis and visual acuity (VA) between bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL with a bifocal IOL. METHODS: This is a non-randomized, prospective comparative study included 74 eyes of 37 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and bilateral implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP IOL (bilateral group; 21 patients) or blended implantation of Tecnis Symfony ZXR00 and Tecnis ZLB00 IOL (blended group; 16 patients). The primary outcomes were stereoacuity and binocular VA. The secondary outcomes were visual defocus curve, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Follow-up was performed 3 months after the surgery. RESULTS: The mean near stereoacuity was 49.76 ± 22.67 and 120.63 ± 90.94 seconds of arc (arcsec) in the bilateral and blended groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Near stereoacuity was positively correlated with VA difference of two eyes (r = 0.896, P < 0.001). The mean binocular uncorrected visual acuity at 40 cm, 80 cm, 5 m, and corrected distance visual acuity at 5 m of the bilateral and blended groups was not statistically significant different. The bilateral group had better VA at a vergence from −2.5 to −4.0 D. Both groups obtained high quality of life and patient satisfaction scores. CONCLUSION: The bilateral and blended groups achieved good binocular VA, quality of life, and high patient satisfaction. However, the near stereoacuity of the blended group was worse. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9629615/ /pubmed/36341263 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1042101 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhu, Fan and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Zhu, Meiyi
Fan, Wei
Zhang, Guangbin
Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
title Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
title_full Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
title_fullStr Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
title_full_unstemmed Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
title_short Stereopsis and visual acuity: Bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
title_sort stereopsis and visual acuity: bilateral trifocal versus blended extended depth of focus and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9629615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36341263
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1042101
work_keys_str_mv AT zhumeiyi stereopsisandvisualacuitybilateraltrifocalversusblendedextendeddepthoffocusanddiffractivebifocalintraocularlenses
AT fanwei stereopsisandvisualacuitybilateraltrifocalversusblendedextendeddepthoffocusanddiffractivebifocalintraocularlenses
AT zhangguangbin stereopsisandvisualacuitybilateraltrifocalversusblendedextendeddepthoffocusanddiffractivebifocalintraocularlenses