Cargando…

Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake

BACKGROUND: There is a lot of fact-based information and misinformation in the online discourses and discussions about the COVID-19 vaccines. METHOD: Using a sample of nearly four million geotagged English tweets and the data from the CDC COVID Data Tracker, we conducted the Fama-MacBeth regression...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyu, Hanjia, Zheng, Zihe, Luo, Jiebo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AAAS 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9629683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408200
http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2022/9858292
_version_ 1784823449873547264
author Lyu, Hanjia
Zheng, Zihe
Luo, Jiebo
author_facet Lyu, Hanjia
Zheng, Zihe
Luo, Jiebo
author_sort Lyu, Hanjia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a lot of fact-based information and misinformation in the online discourses and discussions about the COVID-19 vaccines. METHOD: Using a sample of nearly four million geotagged English tweets and the data from the CDC COVID Data Tracker, we conducted the Fama-MacBeth regression with the Newey-West adjustment to understand the influence of both misinformation and fact-based news on Twitter on the COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the US from April 19 when US adults were vaccine eligible to June 30, 2021, after controlling state-level factors such as demographics, education, and the pandemic severity. We identified the tweets related to either misinformation or fact-based news by analyzing the URLs. RESULTS: One percent increase in fact-related Twitter users is associated with an approximately 0.87 decrease (B = −0.87, SE = 0.25, and p < .001) in the number of daily new vaccinated people per hundred. No significant relationship was found between the percentage of fake-news-related users and the vaccination rate. CONCLUSION: The negative association between the percentage of fact-related users and the vaccination rate might be due to a combination of a larger user-level influence and the negative impact of online social endorsement on vaccination intent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9629683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AAAS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96296832022-11-14 Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake Lyu, Hanjia Zheng, Zihe Luo, Jiebo Health Data Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a lot of fact-based information and misinformation in the online discourses and discussions about the COVID-19 vaccines. METHOD: Using a sample of nearly four million geotagged English tweets and the data from the CDC COVID Data Tracker, we conducted the Fama-MacBeth regression with the Newey-West adjustment to understand the influence of both misinformation and fact-based news on Twitter on the COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the US from April 19 when US adults were vaccine eligible to June 30, 2021, after controlling state-level factors such as demographics, education, and the pandemic severity. We identified the tweets related to either misinformation or fact-based news by analyzing the URLs. RESULTS: One percent increase in fact-related Twitter users is associated with an approximately 0.87 decrease (B = −0.87, SE = 0.25, and p < .001) in the number of daily new vaccinated people per hundred. No significant relationship was found between the percentage of fake-news-related users and the vaccination rate. CONCLUSION: The negative association between the percentage of fact-related users and the vaccination rate might be due to a combination of a larger user-level influence and the negative impact of online social endorsement on vaccination intent. AAAS 2022-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9629683/ /pubmed/36408200 http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2022/9858292 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hanjia Lyu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Exclusive Licensee Peking University Health Science Center. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Research Article
Lyu, Hanjia
Zheng, Zihe
Luo, Jiebo
Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake
title Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake
title_full Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake
title_fullStr Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake
title_full_unstemmed Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake
title_short Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake
title_sort misinformation versus facts: understanding the influence of news regarding covid-19 vaccines on vaccine uptake
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9629683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408200
http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2022/9858292
work_keys_str_mv AT lyuhanjia misinformationversusfactsunderstandingtheinfluenceofnewsregardingcovid19vaccinesonvaccineuptake
AT zhengzihe misinformationversusfactsunderstandingtheinfluenceofnewsregardingcovid19vaccinesonvaccineuptake
AT luojiebo misinformationversusfactsunderstandingtheinfluenceofnewsregardingcovid19vaccinesonvaccineuptake