Cargando…
Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake
BACKGROUND: There is a lot of fact-based information and misinformation in the online discourses and discussions about the COVID-19 vaccines. METHOD: Using a sample of nearly four million geotagged English tweets and the data from the CDC COVID Data Tracker, we conducted the Fama-MacBeth regression...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AAAS
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9629683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408200 http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2022/9858292 |
_version_ | 1784823449873547264 |
---|---|
author | Lyu, Hanjia Zheng, Zihe Luo, Jiebo |
author_facet | Lyu, Hanjia Zheng, Zihe Luo, Jiebo |
author_sort | Lyu, Hanjia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a lot of fact-based information and misinformation in the online discourses and discussions about the COVID-19 vaccines. METHOD: Using a sample of nearly four million geotagged English tweets and the data from the CDC COVID Data Tracker, we conducted the Fama-MacBeth regression with the Newey-West adjustment to understand the influence of both misinformation and fact-based news on Twitter on the COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the US from April 19 when US adults were vaccine eligible to June 30, 2021, after controlling state-level factors such as demographics, education, and the pandemic severity. We identified the tweets related to either misinformation or fact-based news by analyzing the URLs. RESULTS: One percent increase in fact-related Twitter users is associated with an approximately 0.87 decrease (B = −0.87, SE = 0.25, and p < .001) in the number of daily new vaccinated people per hundred. No significant relationship was found between the percentage of fake-news-related users and the vaccination rate. CONCLUSION: The negative association between the percentage of fact-related users and the vaccination rate might be due to a combination of a larger user-level influence and the negative impact of online social endorsement on vaccination intent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9629683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AAAS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96296832022-11-14 Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake Lyu, Hanjia Zheng, Zihe Luo, Jiebo Health Data Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a lot of fact-based information and misinformation in the online discourses and discussions about the COVID-19 vaccines. METHOD: Using a sample of nearly four million geotagged English tweets and the data from the CDC COVID Data Tracker, we conducted the Fama-MacBeth regression with the Newey-West adjustment to understand the influence of both misinformation and fact-based news on Twitter on the COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the US from April 19 when US adults were vaccine eligible to June 30, 2021, after controlling state-level factors such as demographics, education, and the pandemic severity. We identified the tweets related to either misinformation or fact-based news by analyzing the URLs. RESULTS: One percent increase in fact-related Twitter users is associated with an approximately 0.87 decrease (B = −0.87, SE = 0.25, and p < .001) in the number of daily new vaccinated people per hundred. No significant relationship was found between the percentage of fake-news-related users and the vaccination rate. CONCLUSION: The negative association between the percentage of fact-related users and the vaccination rate might be due to a combination of a larger user-level influence and the negative impact of online social endorsement on vaccination intent. AAAS 2022-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9629683/ /pubmed/36408200 http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2022/9858292 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hanjia Lyu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Exclusive Licensee Peking University Health Science Center. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lyu, Hanjia Zheng, Zihe Luo, Jiebo Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake |
title | Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake |
title_full | Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake |
title_fullStr | Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake |
title_full_unstemmed | Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake |
title_short | Misinformation versus Facts: Understanding the Influence of News regarding COVID-19 Vaccines on Vaccine Uptake |
title_sort | misinformation versus facts: understanding the influence of news regarding covid-19 vaccines on vaccine uptake |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9629683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408200 http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2022/9858292 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lyuhanjia misinformationversusfactsunderstandingtheinfluenceofnewsregardingcovid19vaccinesonvaccineuptake AT zhengzihe misinformationversusfactsunderstandingtheinfluenceofnewsregardingcovid19vaccinesonvaccineuptake AT luojiebo misinformationversusfactsunderstandingtheinfluenceofnewsregardingcovid19vaccinesonvaccineuptake |