Cargando…
A matter of space: how the spatial heterogeneity in energy deposition determines the biological outcome of radiation exposure
The outcome of the exposure of living organisms to ionizing radiation is determined by the distribution of the associated energy deposition at different spatial scales. Radiation proceeds through ionizations and excitations of hit molecules with an ~ nm spacing. Approaches such as nanodosimetry/micr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36220965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-022-00989-z |
_version_ | 1784823546532331520 |
---|---|
author | Baiocco, Giorgio Bartzsch, Stefan Conte, Valeria Friedrich, Thomas Jakob, Burkhard Tartas, Adrianna Villagrasa, Carmen Prise, Kevin M. |
author_facet | Baiocco, Giorgio Bartzsch, Stefan Conte, Valeria Friedrich, Thomas Jakob, Burkhard Tartas, Adrianna Villagrasa, Carmen Prise, Kevin M. |
author_sort | Baiocco, Giorgio |
collection | PubMed |
description | The outcome of the exposure of living organisms to ionizing radiation is determined by the distribution of the associated energy deposition at different spatial scales. Radiation proceeds through ionizations and excitations of hit molecules with an ~ nm spacing. Approaches such as nanodosimetry/microdosimetry and Monte Carlo track-structure simulations have been successfully adopted to investigate radiation quality effects: they allow to explore correlations between the spatial clustering of such energy depositions at the scales of DNA or chromosome domains and their biological consequences at the cellular level. Physical features alone, however, are not enough to assess the entity and complexity of radiation-induced DNA damage: this latter is the result of an interplay between radiation track structure and the spatial architecture of chromatin, and further depends on the chromatin dynamic response, affecting the activation and efficiency of the repair machinery. The heterogeneity of radiation energy depositions at the single-cell level affects the trade-off between cell inactivation and induction of viable mutations and hence influences radiation-induced carcinogenesis. In radiation therapy, where the goal is cancer cell inactivation, the delivery of a homogenous dose to the tumour has been the traditional approach in clinical practice. However, evidence is accumulating that introducing heterogeneity with spatially fractionated beams (mini- and microbeam therapy) can lead to significant advantages, particularly in sparing normal tissues. Such findings cannot be explained in merely physical terms, and their interpretation requires considering the scales at play in the underlying biological mechanisms, suggesting a systemic response to radiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9630194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96301942022-11-04 A matter of space: how the spatial heterogeneity in energy deposition determines the biological outcome of radiation exposure Baiocco, Giorgio Bartzsch, Stefan Conte, Valeria Friedrich, Thomas Jakob, Burkhard Tartas, Adrianna Villagrasa, Carmen Prise, Kevin M. Radiat Environ Biophys Review The outcome of the exposure of living organisms to ionizing radiation is determined by the distribution of the associated energy deposition at different spatial scales. Radiation proceeds through ionizations and excitations of hit molecules with an ~ nm spacing. Approaches such as nanodosimetry/microdosimetry and Monte Carlo track-structure simulations have been successfully adopted to investigate radiation quality effects: they allow to explore correlations between the spatial clustering of such energy depositions at the scales of DNA or chromosome domains and their biological consequences at the cellular level. Physical features alone, however, are not enough to assess the entity and complexity of radiation-induced DNA damage: this latter is the result of an interplay between radiation track structure and the spatial architecture of chromatin, and further depends on the chromatin dynamic response, affecting the activation and efficiency of the repair machinery. The heterogeneity of radiation energy depositions at the single-cell level affects the trade-off between cell inactivation and induction of viable mutations and hence influences radiation-induced carcinogenesis. In radiation therapy, where the goal is cancer cell inactivation, the delivery of a homogenous dose to the tumour has been the traditional approach in clinical practice. However, evidence is accumulating that introducing heterogeneity with spatially fractionated beams (mini- and microbeam therapy) can lead to significant advantages, particularly in sparing normal tissues. Such findings cannot be explained in merely physical terms, and their interpretation requires considering the scales at play in the underlying biological mechanisms, suggesting a systemic response to radiation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9630194/ /pubmed/36220965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-022-00989-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Baiocco, Giorgio Bartzsch, Stefan Conte, Valeria Friedrich, Thomas Jakob, Burkhard Tartas, Adrianna Villagrasa, Carmen Prise, Kevin M. A matter of space: how the spatial heterogeneity in energy deposition determines the biological outcome of radiation exposure |
title | A matter of space: how the spatial heterogeneity in energy deposition determines the biological outcome of radiation exposure |
title_full | A matter of space: how the spatial heterogeneity in energy deposition determines the biological outcome of radiation exposure |
title_fullStr | A matter of space: how the spatial heterogeneity in energy deposition determines the biological outcome of radiation exposure |
title_full_unstemmed | A matter of space: how the spatial heterogeneity in energy deposition determines the biological outcome of radiation exposure |
title_short | A matter of space: how the spatial heterogeneity in energy deposition determines the biological outcome of radiation exposure |
title_sort | matter of space: how the spatial heterogeneity in energy deposition determines the biological outcome of radiation exposure |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36220965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-022-00989-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baioccogiorgio amatterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT bartzschstefan amatterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT contevaleria amatterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT friedrichthomas amatterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT jakobburkhard amatterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT tartasadrianna amatterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT villagrasacarmen amatterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT prisekevinm amatterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT baioccogiorgio matterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT bartzschstefan matterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT contevaleria matterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT friedrichthomas matterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT jakobburkhard matterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT tartasadrianna matterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT villagrasacarmen matterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure AT prisekevinm matterofspacehowthespatialheterogeneityinenergydepositiondeterminesthebiologicaloutcomeofradiationexposure |