Cargando…

Strategies of protected area use by Asian elephants in relation to motivational state and social affiliations

Animals’ space requirements may vary according to life-history and social considerations. We observed 516 wild adult Asian elephants from both sexes, over 9 years, to investigate how life-history traits and social behavior influence protected-area (PA) use at Udawalawe National Park, Sri Lanka. Male...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madsen, Anastasia E., Minge, Christin, Pushpakumara, T. V., Weerathunga, U. Sameera, Padmalal, U. K., Weerakoon, Devaka K., de Silva, Shermin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36323758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22989-1
_version_ 1784823599548334080
author Madsen, Anastasia E.
Minge, Christin
Pushpakumara, T. V.
Weerathunga, U. Sameera
Padmalal, U. K.
Weerakoon, Devaka K.
de Silva, Shermin
author_facet Madsen, Anastasia E.
Minge, Christin
Pushpakumara, T. V.
Weerathunga, U. Sameera
Padmalal, U. K.
Weerakoon, Devaka K.
de Silva, Shermin
author_sort Madsen, Anastasia E.
collection PubMed
description Animals’ space requirements may vary according to life-history and social considerations. We observed 516 wild adult Asian elephants from both sexes, over 9 years, to investigate how life-history traits and social behavior influence protected-area (PA) use at Udawalawe National Park, Sri Lanka. Male PA-use, quantified in terms of average between-sightings-interval (BSI), was significantly influenced by the interaction of age class and motivational state (i.e. reproduction vs. foraging). Musth lengthened with age, with a median of 24.5 days for ages 21–30, 32.5 days for ages 31–40, and 45 days for those > 40. A minority (11%) used it exclusively during musth, while others used it exclusively for foraging (44%) or both (45%). Males using it in both states and older musth-only males were more likely to be seen across years. There were 16 social communities containing between 2–22 adult females. Females’ BSI was significantly influenced by social ties, but this relationship was weak, because members of social communities do not necessarily disperse together, resulting in high individual variation in space-use. Inter-annual variability in sightings among individuals of both sexes indicates that around ¾ of the population is likely non-residential across years, challenging the prevailing fortress-conservation paradigm of wildlife management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9630427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96304272022-11-04 Strategies of protected area use by Asian elephants in relation to motivational state and social affiliations Madsen, Anastasia E. Minge, Christin Pushpakumara, T. V. Weerathunga, U. Sameera Padmalal, U. K. Weerakoon, Devaka K. de Silva, Shermin Sci Rep Article Animals’ space requirements may vary according to life-history and social considerations. We observed 516 wild adult Asian elephants from both sexes, over 9 years, to investigate how life-history traits and social behavior influence protected-area (PA) use at Udawalawe National Park, Sri Lanka. Male PA-use, quantified in terms of average between-sightings-interval (BSI), was significantly influenced by the interaction of age class and motivational state (i.e. reproduction vs. foraging). Musth lengthened with age, with a median of 24.5 days for ages 21–30, 32.5 days for ages 31–40, and 45 days for those > 40. A minority (11%) used it exclusively during musth, while others used it exclusively for foraging (44%) or both (45%). Males using it in both states and older musth-only males were more likely to be seen across years. There were 16 social communities containing between 2–22 adult females. Females’ BSI was significantly influenced by social ties, but this relationship was weak, because members of social communities do not necessarily disperse together, resulting in high individual variation in space-use. Inter-annual variability in sightings among individuals of both sexes indicates that around ¾ of the population is likely non-residential across years, challenging the prevailing fortress-conservation paradigm of wildlife management. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9630427/ /pubmed/36323758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22989-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Madsen, Anastasia E.
Minge, Christin
Pushpakumara, T. V.
Weerathunga, U. Sameera
Padmalal, U. K.
Weerakoon, Devaka K.
de Silva, Shermin
Strategies of protected area use by Asian elephants in relation to motivational state and social affiliations
title Strategies of protected area use by Asian elephants in relation to motivational state and social affiliations
title_full Strategies of protected area use by Asian elephants in relation to motivational state and social affiliations
title_fullStr Strategies of protected area use by Asian elephants in relation to motivational state and social affiliations
title_full_unstemmed Strategies of protected area use by Asian elephants in relation to motivational state and social affiliations
title_short Strategies of protected area use by Asian elephants in relation to motivational state and social affiliations
title_sort strategies of protected area use by asian elephants in relation to motivational state and social affiliations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36323758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22989-1
work_keys_str_mv AT madsenanastasiae strategiesofprotectedareausebyasianelephantsinrelationtomotivationalstateandsocialaffiliations
AT mingechristin strategiesofprotectedareausebyasianelephantsinrelationtomotivationalstateandsocialaffiliations
AT pushpakumaratv strategiesofprotectedareausebyasianelephantsinrelationtomotivationalstateandsocialaffiliations
AT weerathungausameera strategiesofprotectedareausebyasianelephantsinrelationtomotivationalstateandsocialaffiliations
AT padmalaluk strategiesofprotectedareausebyasianelephantsinrelationtomotivationalstateandsocialaffiliations
AT weerakoondevakak strategiesofprotectedareausebyasianelephantsinrelationtomotivationalstateandsocialaffiliations
AT desilvashermin strategiesofprotectedareausebyasianelephantsinrelationtomotivationalstateandsocialaffiliations