Cargando…
Black-box and surrogate optimization for tuning spiking neural models of striatum plasticity
The basal ganglia (BG) is a brain structure that has long been proposed to play an essential role in action selection, and theoretical models of spiking neurons have tried to explain how the BG solves this problem. A recently proposed functional and biologically inspired network model of the striatu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2022.1017222 |
_version_ | 1784823612005416960 |
---|---|
author | Cruz, Nicolás C. González-Redondo, Álvaro Redondo, Juana L. Garrido, Jesús A. Ortigosa, Eva M. Ortigosa, Pilar M. |
author_facet | Cruz, Nicolás C. González-Redondo, Álvaro Redondo, Juana L. Garrido, Jesús A. Ortigosa, Eva M. Ortigosa, Pilar M. |
author_sort | Cruz, Nicolás C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The basal ganglia (BG) is a brain structure that has long been proposed to play an essential role in action selection, and theoretical models of spiking neurons have tried to explain how the BG solves this problem. A recently proposed functional and biologically inspired network model of the striatum (an important nucleus of the BG) is based on spike-timing-dependent eligibility (STDE) and captured important experimental features of this nucleus. The model can recognize complex input patterns and consistently choose rewarded actions to respond to such sensory inputs. However, model tuning is challenging due to two main reasons. The first is the expert knowledge required, resulting in tedious and potentially biased trial-and-error procedures. The second is the computational cost of assessing model configurations (approximately 1.78 h per evaluation). This study addresses the model tuning problem through numerical optimization. Considering the cost of assessing solutions, the selected methods stand out due to their low requirements for solution evaluations and compatibility with high-performance computing. They are the SurrogateOpt solver of Matlab and the RBFOpt library, both based on radial basis function approximations, and DIRECT-GL, an enhanced version of the widespread black-box optimizer DIRECT. Besides, a parallel random search serves as a baseline reference of the outcome of opting for sophisticated methods. SurrogateOpt turns out to be the best option for tuning this kind of model. It outperforms, on average, the quality of the configuration found by an expert and works significantly faster and autonomously. RBFOpt and the random search share the second position, but their average results are below the option found by hand. Finally, DIRECT-GL follows this line becoming the worst-performing method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9630480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96304802022-11-04 Black-box and surrogate optimization for tuning spiking neural models of striatum plasticity Cruz, Nicolás C. González-Redondo, Álvaro Redondo, Juana L. Garrido, Jesús A. Ortigosa, Eva M. Ortigosa, Pilar M. Front Neuroinform Neuroscience The basal ganglia (BG) is a brain structure that has long been proposed to play an essential role in action selection, and theoretical models of spiking neurons have tried to explain how the BG solves this problem. A recently proposed functional and biologically inspired network model of the striatum (an important nucleus of the BG) is based on spike-timing-dependent eligibility (STDE) and captured important experimental features of this nucleus. The model can recognize complex input patterns and consistently choose rewarded actions to respond to such sensory inputs. However, model tuning is challenging due to two main reasons. The first is the expert knowledge required, resulting in tedious and potentially biased trial-and-error procedures. The second is the computational cost of assessing model configurations (approximately 1.78 h per evaluation). This study addresses the model tuning problem through numerical optimization. Considering the cost of assessing solutions, the selected methods stand out due to their low requirements for solution evaluations and compatibility with high-performance computing. They are the SurrogateOpt solver of Matlab and the RBFOpt library, both based on radial basis function approximations, and DIRECT-GL, an enhanced version of the widespread black-box optimizer DIRECT. Besides, a parallel random search serves as a baseline reference of the outcome of opting for sophisticated methods. SurrogateOpt turns out to be the best option for tuning this kind of model. It outperforms, on average, the quality of the configuration found by an expert and works significantly faster and autonomously. RBFOpt and the random search share the second position, but their average results are below the option found by hand. Finally, DIRECT-GL follows this line becoming the worst-performing method. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9630480/ /pubmed/36338942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2022.1017222 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cruz, González-Redondo, Redondo, Garrido, Ortigosa and Ortigosa. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Cruz, Nicolás C. González-Redondo, Álvaro Redondo, Juana L. Garrido, Jesús A. Ortigosa, Eva M. Ortigosa, Pilar M. Black-box and surrogate optimization for tuning spiking neural models of striatum plasticity |
title | Black-box and surrogate optimization for tuning spiking neural models of striatum plasticity |
title_full | Black-box and surrogate optimization for tuning spiking neural models of striatum plasticity |
title_fullStr | Black-box and surrogate optimization for tuning spiking neural models of striatum plasticity |
title_full_unstemmed | Black-box and surrogate optimization for tuning spiking neural models of striatum plasticity |
title_short | Black-box and surrogate optimization for tuning spiking neural models of striatum plasticity |
title_sort | black-box and surrogate optimization for tuning spiking neural models of striatum plasticity |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2022.1017222 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cruznicolasc blackboxandsurrogateoptimizationfortuningspikingneuralmodelsofstriatumplasticity AT gonzalezredondoalvaro blackboxandsurrogateoptimizationfortuningspikingneuralmodelsofstriatumplasticity AT redondojuanal blackboxandsurrogateoptimizationfortuningspikingneuralmodelsofstriatumplasticity AT garridojesusa blackboxandsurrogateoptimizationfortuningspikingneuralmodelsofstriatumplasticity AT ortigosaevam blackboxandsurrogateoptimizationfortuningspikingneuralmodelsofstriatumplasticity AT ortigosapilarm blackboxandsurrogateoptimizationfortuningspikingneuralmodelsofstriatumplasticity |