Cargando…

Peritoneal seeding of embolic beads after uterine artery embolization

BACKGROUND: Incidental identification of peritoneal nodules during laparoscopy may present a diagnostic dilemma. The differential diagnosis includes a variety of benign and malignant entities such as peritoneal carcinomatosis. CASE: A 44-year-old G2P2 woman presented with recurrent menorrhagia and p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jahangiri, Younes, Draper, Riley, Gressel, Gregory, Taber, Rodman, Morrison, Jane C, Morrison, James J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2022.09.063
_version_ 1784823648216940544
author Jahangiri, Younes
Draper, Riley
Gressel, Gregory
Taber, Rodman
Morrison, Jane C
Morrison, James J
author_facet Jahangiri, Younes
Draper, Riley
Gressel, Gregory
Taber, Rodman
Morrison, Jane C
Morrison, James J
author_sort Jahangiri, Younes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incidental identification of peritoneal nodules during laparoscopy may present a diagnostic dilemma. The differential diagnosis includes a variety of benign and malignant entities such as peritoneal carcinomatosis. CASE: A 44-year-old G2P2 woman presented with recurrent menorrhagia and pelvic pain was found to have large uterine fibroids on imaging studies. Bilateral uterine artery embolization was performed with complete devascularization of the fibroid. Seven years later, she presented with similar symptoms. Imaging studies demonstrated a vascular uterine lesion. A total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy was performed with no complications. During surgery, vesicular peritoneal implants were incidentally identified posterior to the uterus between the uterosacral ligaments. Biopsy and pathologic analysis of these nodules confirmed that they contained foreign material consistent with embolization beads. Pathologic analysis of the uterus demonstrated an intramural uterine fibroid, and presence of embolization beads in cervix, myometrium and bilateral peritubal regions. CONCLUSION: Non-target peritoneal implantation of embolic beads after uterine artery embolization is a rare entity that can result in vesicular appearing nodules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9630625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96306252022-11-04 Peritoneal seeding of embolic beads after uterine artery embolization Jahangiri, Younes Draper, Riley Gressel, Gregory Taber, Rodman Morrison, Jane C Morrison, James J Radiol Case Rep Case Report BACKGROUND: Incidental identification of peritoneal nodules during laparoscopy may present a diagnostic dilemma. The differential diagnosis includes a variety of benign and malignant entities such as peritoneal carcinomatosis. CASE: A 44-year-old G2P2 woman presented with recurrent menorrhagia and pelvic pain was found to have large uterine fibroids on imaging studies. Bilateral uterine artery embolization was performed with complete devascularization of the fibroid. Seven years later, she presented with similar symptoms. Imaging studies demonstrated a vascular uterine lesion. A total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy was performed with no complications. During surgery, vesicular peritoneal implants were incidentally identified posterior to the uterus between the uterosacral ligaments. Biopsy and pathologic analysis of these nodules confirmed that they contained foreign material consistent with embolization beads. Pathologic analysis of the uterus demonstrated an intramural uterine fibroid, and presence of embolization beads in cervix, myometrium and bilateral peritubal regions. CONCLUSION: Non-target peritoneal implantation of embolic beads after uterine artery embolization is a rare entity that can result in vesicular appearing nodules. Elsevier 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9630625/ /pubmed/36340240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2022.09.063 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of University of Washington. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Jahangiri, Younes
Draper, Riley
Gressel, Gregory
Taber, Rodman
Morrison, Jane C
Morrison, James J
Peritoneal seeding of embolic beads after uterine artery embolization
title Peritoneal seeding of embolic beads after uterine artery embolization
title_full Peritoneal seeding of embolic beads after uterine artery embolization
title_fullStr Peritoneal seeding of embolic beads after uterine artery embolization
title_full_unstemmed Peritoneal seeding of embolic beads after uterine artery embolization
title_short Peritoneal seeding of embolic beads after uterine artery embolization
title_sort peritoneal seeding of embolic beads after uterine artery embolization
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2022.09.063
work_keys_str_mv AT jahangiriyounes peritonealseedingofembolicbeadsafteruterinearteryembolization
AT draperriley peritonealseedingofembolicbeadsafteruterinearteryembolization
AT gresselgregory peritonealseedingofembolicbeadsafteruterinearteryembolization
AT taberrodman peritonealseedingofembolicbeadsafteruterinearteryembolization
AT morrisonjanec peritonealseedingofembolicbeadsafteruterinearteryembolization
AT morrisonjamesj peritonealseedingofembolicbeadsafteruterinearteryembolization