Cargando…
Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography
Electromyography (EMG) generated by human hand movements is usually used to decode different action types with high accuracy. However, the classifications of the gestures rarely consider the impact of force, and the estimation of the grasp force when performing natural grasping movements is so far o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340765 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1020086 |
_version_ | 1784823654806192128 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Baoguo Zhang, Kun Yang, Xinhao Liu, Deping Hu, Cong Li, Huijun Song, Aiguo |
author_facet | Xu, Baoguo Zhang, Kun Yang, Xinhao Liu, Deping Hu, Cong Li, Huijun Song, Aiguo |
author_sort | Xu, Baoguo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electromyography (EMG) generated by human hand movements is usually used to decode different action types with high accuracy. However, the classifications of the gestures rarely consider the impact of force, and the estimation of the grasp force when performing natural grasping movements is so far overlooked. Decoding natural grasping movements and estimating the force generated by the associated movements can help patients to improve the accuracy of prosthesis control. This study mainly focused on two aspects: the classification of four natural grasping movements and the force estimation of these actions. For this purpose, we designed an experimental platform where subjects could perform four common natural grasping movements in daily life, including pinch, palmar, twist, and plug grasp, to complete target profiles. On the one hand, the results showed that, for natural grasping movements with different levels of force (three levels at 20, 50, and 80%), the average accuracy could reach from 91.43 to 97.33% under five classification schemes. On the other hand, the feasibility of force estimation for natural grasping movements was demonstrated. Furthermore, in the process of force estimation, we confirmed that the regression performance about plug grasp was the best, and the average R(2) could reach 0.9082. Besides, we found that the regression results were affected by the speed of force application. These findings contribute to the natural control of myoelectric prosthesis and the EMG-based rehabilitation training system, improving the user’s experience and acceptance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9630650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96306502022-11-04 Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography Xu, Baoguo Zhang, Kun Yang, Xinhao Liu, Deping Hu, Cong Li, Huijun Song, Aiguo Front Neurosci Neuroscience Electromyography (EMG) generated by human hand movements is usually used to decode different action types with high accuracy. However, the classifications of the gestures rarely consider the impact of force, and the estimation of the grasp force when performing natural grasping movements is so far overlooked. Decoding natural grasping movements and estimating the force generated by the associated movements can help patients to improve the accuracy of prosthesis control. This study mainly focused on two aspects: the classification of four natural grasping movements and the force estimation of these actions. For this purpose, we designed an experimental platform where subjects could perform four common natural grasping movements in daily life, including pinch, palmar, twist, and plug grasp, to complete target profiles. On the one hand, the results showed that, for natural grasping movements with different levels of force (three levels at 20, 50, and 80%), the average accuracy could reach from 91.43 to 97.33% under five classification schemes. On the other hand, the feasibility of force estimation for natural grasping movements was demonstrated. Furthermore, in the process of force estimation, we confirmed that the regression performance about plug grasp was the best, and the average R(2) could reach 0.9082. Besides, we found that the regression results were affected by the speed of force application. These findings contribute to the natural control of myoelectric prosthesis and the EMG-based rehabilitation training system, improving the user’s experience and acceptance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9630650/ /pubmed/36340765 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1020086 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xu, Zhang, Yang, Liu, Hu, Li and Song. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Xu, Baoguo Zhang, Kun Yang, Xinhao Liu, Deping Hu, Cong Li, Huijun Song, Aiguo Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography |
title | Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography |
title_full | Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography |
title_fullStr | Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography |
title_full_unstemmed | Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography |
title_short | Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography |
title_sort | natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340765 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1020086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xubaoguo naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography AT zhangkun naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography AT yangxinhao naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography AT liudeping naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography AT hucong naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography AT lihuijun naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography AT songaiguo naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography |