Cargando…

Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography

Electromyography (EMG) generated by human hand movements is usually used to decode different action types with high accuracy. However, the classifications of the gestures rarely consider the impact of force, and the estimation of the grasp force when performing natural grasping movements is so far o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Baoguo, Zhang, Kun, Yang, Xinhao, Liu, Deping, Hu, Cong, Li, Huijun, Song, Aiguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340765
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1020086
_version_ 1784823654806192128
author Xu, Baoguo
Zhang, Kun
Yang, Xinhao
Liu, Deping
Hu, Cong
Li, Huijun
Song, Aiguo
author_facet Xu, Baoguo
Zhang, Kun
Yang, Xinhao
Liu, Deping
Hu, Cong
Li, Huijun
Song, Aiguo
author_sort Xu, Baoguo
collection PubMed
description Electromyography (EMG) generated by human hand movements is usually used to decode different action types with high accuracy. However, the classifications of the gestures rarely consider the impact of force, and the estimation of the grasp force when performing natural grasping movements is so far overlooked. Decoding natural grasping movements and estimating the force generated by the associated movements can help patients to improve the accuracy of prosthesis control. This study mainly focused on two aspects: the classification of four natural grasping movements and the force estimation of these actions. For this purpose, we designed an experimental platform where subjects could perform four common natural grasping movements in daily life, including pinch, palmar, twist, and plug grasp, to complete target profiles. On the one hand, the results showed that, for natural grasping movements with different levels of force (three levels at 20, 50, and 80%), the average accuracy could reach from 91.43 to 97.33% under five classification schemes. On the other hand, the feasibility of force estimation for natural grasping movements was demonstrated. Furthermore, in the process of force estimation, we confirmed that the regression performance about plug grasp was the best, and the average R(2) could reach 0.9082. Besides, we found that the regression results were affected by the speed of force application. These findings contribute to the natural control of myoelectric prosthesis and the EMG-based rehabilitation training system, improving the user’s experience and acceptance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9630650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96306502022-11-04 Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography Xu, Baoguo Zhang, Kun Yang, Xinhao Liu, Deping Hu, Cong Li, Huijun Song, Aiguo Front Neurosci Neuroscience Electromyography (EMG) generated by human hand movements is usually used to decode different action types with high accuracy. However, the classifications of the gestures rarely consider the impact of force, and the estimation of the grasp force when performing natural grasping movements is so far overlooked. Decoding natural grasping movements and estimating the force generated by the associated movements can help patients to improve the accuracy of prosthesis control. This study mainly focused on two aspects: the classification of four natural grasping movements and the force estimation of these actions. For this purpose, we designed an experimental platform where subjects could perform four common natural grasping movements in daily life, including pinch, palmar, twist, and plug grasp, to complete target profiles. On the one hand, the results showed that, for natural grasping movements with different levels of force (three levels at 20, 50, and 80%), the average accuracy could reach from 91.43 to 97.33% under five classification schemes. On the other hand, the feasibility of force estimation for natural grasping movements was demonstrated. Furthermore, in the process of force estimation, we confirmed that the regression performance about plug grasp was the best, and the average R(2) could reach 0.9082. Besides, we found that the regression results were affected by the speed of force application. These findings contribute to the natural control of myoelectric prosthesis and the EMG-based rehabilitation training system, improving the user’s experience and acceptance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9630650/ /pubmed/36340765 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1020086 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xu, Zhang, Yang, Liu, Hu, Li and Song. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Xu, Baoguo
Zhang, Kun
Yang, Xinhao
Liu, Deping
Hu, Cong
Li, Huijun
Song, Aiguo
Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography
title Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography
title_full Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography
title_fullStr Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography
title_full_unstemmed Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography
title_short Natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography
title_sort natural grasping movement recognition and force estimation using electromyography
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340765
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1020086
work_keys_str_mv AT xubaoguo naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography
AT zhangkun naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography
AT yangxinhao naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography
AT liudeping naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography
AT hucong naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography
AT lihuijun naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography
AT songaiguo naturalgraspingmovementrecognitionandforceestimationusingelectromyography