Cargando…

Performance of 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the STABILITY Study: A Subgroup Analysis

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLRs) with graft diameters <8mm have been shown to have higher revision rates. The 5-strand (5S) hamstring autograft configuration is a proposed option to increase graft diameter. PURPOSE: To investigate the differences in clinical ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lodhia, Parth, Nazari, Goris, Bryant, Dianne, Getgood, Alan, McCormack, Robert, Getgood, Alan M.J., Bryant, Dianne M., Litchfield, Robert, Willits, Kevin, Birmingham, Trevor, Hewison, Chris, Firth, Andrew D., Wanlin, Stacey, Pinto, Ryan, Martindale, Ashley, O’Neill, Lindsey, Jennings, Morgan, Daniluk, Michal, McCormack, Robert G., Boyer, Dory, Zomar, Mauri, Moon, Karyn, Moon, Raely, Fan, Brenda, Mohan, Bindu, Payne, Kyrsten, Heard, Mark, Buchko, Gregory M., Hiemstra, Laurie A., Kerslake, Sarah, Tynedal, Jeremy, MacDonald, Peter B., Stranges, Greg, Mcrae, Sheila, Gullett, LeeAnne, Brown, Holly, Legary, Alexandra, Longo, Alison, Christian, Mat, Ferguson, Celeste, Rezansoff, Alex, Mohtadi, Nick, Barber, Rhamona, Chan, Denise, Campbell, Caitlin, Garven, Alexandra, Pulsifer, Karen, Mayer, Michelle, Peterson, Devin, Simunovic, Nicole, Duong, Andrew, Robinson, David, Levy, David, Skelly, Matt, Shanmugaraj, Ajaykumar, Bardana, Davide, Howells, Fiona, Tough, Murray, Spalding, Tim, Thompson, Pete, Metcalfe, Andrew, Asplin, Laura, Dube, Alisen, Clarkson, Louise, Brown, Jaclyn, Bolsover, Alison, Bradshaw, Carolyn, Belgrove, Larissa, Milan, Francis, Turner, Sylvia, Verdugo, Sarah, Lowe, Janet, Dunne, Debra, McGowan, Kerri, Suddens, Charlie-Marie, Verdonk, Peter C.M., Declerq, Geert, Vuylsteke, Kristien, Van Haver, Mieke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36260487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465221128581
_version_ 1784823700721238016
author Lodhia, Parth
Nazari, Goris
Bryant, Dianne
Getgood, Alan
McCormack, Robert
Getgood, Alan M.J.
Bryant, Dianne M.
Litchfield, Robert
Willits, Kevin
Birmingham, Trevor
Hewison, Chris
Firth, Andrew D.
Wanlin, Stacey
Pinto, Ryan
Martindale, Ashley
O’Neill, Lindsey
Jennings, Morgan
Daniluk, Michal
McCormack, Robert G.
Boyer, Dory
Zomar, Mauri
Moon, Karyn
Moon, Raely
Fan, Brenda
Mohan, Bindu
Payne, Kyrsten
Heard, Mark
Buchko, Gregory M.
Hiemstra, Laurie A.
Kerslake, Sarah
Tynedal, Jeremy
MacDonald, Peter B.
Stranges, Greg
Mcrae, Sheila
Gullett, LeeAnne
Brown, Holly
Legary, Alexandra
Longo, Alison
Christian, Mat
Ferguson, Celeste
Rezansoff, Alex
Mohtadi, Nick
Barber, Rhamona
Chan, Denise
Campbell, Caitlin
Garven, Alexandra
Pulsifer, Karen
Mayer, Michelle
Peterson, Devin
Simunovic, Nicole
Duong, Andrew
Robinson, David
Levy, David
Skelly, Matt
Shanmugaraj, Ajaykumar
Bardana, Davide
Howells, Fiona
Tough, Murray
Spalding, Tim
Thompson, Pete
Metcalfe, Andrew
Asplin, Laura
Dube, Alisen
Clarkson, Louise
Brown, Jaclyn
Bolsover, Alison
Bradshaw, Carolyn
Belgrove, Larissa
Milan, Francis
Turner, Sylvia
Verdugo, Sarah
Lowe, Janet
Dunne, Debra
McGowan, Kerri
Suddens, Charlie-Marie
Verdonk, Peter C.M.
Declerq, Geert
Vuylsteke, Kristien
Van Haver, Mieke
author_facet Lodhia, Parth
Nazari, Goris
Bryant, Dianne
Getgood, Alan
McCormack, Robert
Getgood, Alan M.J.
Bryant, Dianne M.
Litchfield, Robert
Willits, Kevin
Birmingham, Trevor
Hewison, Chris
Firth, Andrew D.
Wanlin, Stacey
Pinto, Ryan
Martindale, Ashley
O’Neill, Lindsey
Jennings, Morgan
Daniluk, Michal
McCormack, Robert G.
Boyer, Dory
Zomar, Mauri
Moon, Karyn
Moon, Raely
Fan, Brenda
Mohan, Bindu
Payne, Kyrsten
Heard, Mark
Buchko, Gregory M.
Hiemstra, Laurie A.
Kerslake, Sarah
Tynedal, Jeremy
MacDonald, Peter B.
Stranges, Greg
Mcrae, Sheila
Gullett, LeeAnne
Brown, Holly
Legary, Alexandra
Longo, Alison
Christian, Mat
Ferguson, Celeste
Rezansoff, Alex
Mohtadi, Nick
Barber, Rhamona
Chan, Denise
Campbell, Caitlin
Garven, Alexandra
Pulsifer, Karen
Mayer, Michelle
Peterson, Devin
Simunovic, Nicole
Duong, Andrew
Robinson, David
Levy, David
Skelly, Matt
Shanmugaraj, Ajaykumar
Bardana, Davide
Howells, Fiona
Tough, Murray
Spalding, Tim
Thompson, Pete
Metcalfe, Andrew
Asplin, Laura
Dube, Alisen
Clarkson, Louise
Brown, Jaclyn
Bolsover, Alison
Bradshaw, Carolyn
Belgrove, Larissa
Milan, Francis
Turner, Sylvia
Verdugo, Sarah
Lowe, Janet
Dunne, Debra
McGowan, Kerri
Suddens, Charlie-Marie
Verdonk, Peter C.M.
Declerq, Geert
Vuylsteke, Kristien
Van Haver, Mieke
author_sort Lodhia, Parth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLRs) with graft diameters <8mm have been shown to have higher revision rates. The 5-strand (5S) hamstring autograft configuration is a proposed option to increase graft diameter. PURPOSE: To investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between 4-strand (4S) and 5S hamstring autografts for ACLR in patients who underwent ACLR alone or concomitantly with a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Data from the STABILITY study were analyzed to compare a subgroup of patients undergoing ACLR alone or with a concomitant LET procedure (ACLR + LET) with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm that had either a 4S or 5S hamstring autograft configuration. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of rotatory laxity and/or graft failure. The secondary outcome measures consisted of 2 patient-reported outcome scores (PROs)—namely, the ACL Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACL-QoL) and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 618 patients randomized in the STABILITY study, 399 (228 male; 57%) fit the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 191 and 208 patients underwent 4S and 5S configurations of hamstring ACLR, respectively, with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm. Both groups had similar characteristics other than differences in anthropometric factors—namely, sex, height, and weight, and Beighton scores. The primary outcomes revealed no difference between the 2 groups in rotatory stability (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 0.77-1.84; P = .42) or graft failure (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.51-2.50; P = .76). There was no significant difference between the groups in Lachman (P = .46) and pivot-shift (P = .53) test results at 24 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes revealed no differences in the ACL-QoL (P = .67) and IKDC (P = .83) scores between the 2 subgroups. CONCLUSION: At the 24-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in clinical failure rates and PROs in an analysis of patients with 4S and 5S hamstring autografts of ≥8mm diameter for ACLR or ACLR + LET. The 5S hamstring graft configuration is a viable option to produce larger-diameter ACL grafts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9630854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96308542022-11-04 Performance of 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the STABILITY Study: A Subgroup Analysis Lodhia, Parth Nazari, Goris Bryant, Dianne Getgood, Alan McCormack, Robert Getgood, Alan M.J. Bryant, Dianne M. Litchfield, Robert Willits, Kevin Birmingham, Trevor Hewison, Chris Firth, Andrew D. Wanlin, Stacey Pinto, Ryan Martindale, Ashley O’Neill, Lindsey Jennings, Morgan Daniluk, Michal McCormack, Robert G. Boyer, Dory Zomar, Mauri Moon, Karyn Moon, Raely Fan, Brenda Mohan, Bindu Payne, Kyrsten Heard, Mark Buchko, Gregory M. Hiemstra, Laurie A. Kerslake, Sarah Tynedal, Jeremy MacDonald, Peter B. Stranges, Greg Mcrae, Sheila Gullett, LeeAnne Brown, Holly Legary, Alexandra Longo, Alison Christian, Mat Ferguson, Celeste Rezansoff, Alex Mohtadi, Nick Barber, Rhamona Chan, Denise Campbell, Caitlin Garven, Alexandra Pulsifer, Karen Mayer, Michelle Peterson, Devin Simunovic, Nicole Duong, Andrew Robinson, David Levy, David Skelly, Matt Shanmugaraj, Ajaykumar Bardana, Davide Howells, Fiona Tough, Murray Spalding, Tim Thompson, Pete Metcalfe, Andrew Asplin, Laura Dube, Alisen Clarkson, Louise Brown, Jaclyn Bolsover, Alison Bradshaw, Carolyn Belgrove, Larissa Milan, Francis Turner, Sylvia Verdugo, Sarah Lowe, Janet Dunne, Debra McGowan, Kerri Suddens, Charlie-Marie Verdonk, Peter C.M. Declerq, Geert Vuylsteke, Kristien Van Haver, Mieke Am J Sports Med Articles BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLRs) with graft diameters <8mm have been shown to have higher revision rates. The 5-strand (5S) hamstring autograft configuration is a proposed option to increase graft diameter. PURPOSE: To investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between 4-strand (4S) and 5S hamstring autografts for ACLR in patients who underwent ACLR alone or concomitantly with a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Data from the STABILITY study were analyzed to compare a subgroup of patients undergoing ACLR alone or with a concomitant LET procedure (ACLR + LET) with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm that had either a 4S or 5S hamstring autograft configuration. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of rotatory laxity and/or graft failure. The secondary outcome measures consisted of 2 patient-reported outcome scores (PROs)—namely, the ACL Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACL-QoL) and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 618 patients randomized in the STABILITY study, 399 (228 male; 57%) fit the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 191 and 208 patients underwent 4S and 5S configurations of hamstring ACLR, respectively, with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm. Both groups had similar characteristics other than differences in anthropometric factors—namely, sex, height, and weight, and Beighton scores. The primary outcomes revealed no difference between the 2 groups in rotatory stability (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 0.77-1.84; P = .42) or graft failure (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.51-2.50; P = .76). There was no significant difference between the groups in Lachman (P = .46) and pivot-shift (P = .53) test results at 24 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes revealed no differences in the ACL-QoL (P = .67) and IKDC (P = .83) scores between the 2 subgroups. CONCLUSION: At the 24-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in clinical failure rates and PROs in an analysis of patients with 4S and 5S hamstring autografts of ≥8mm diameter for ACLR or ACLR + LET. The 5S hamstring graft configuration is a viable option to produce larger-diameter ACL grafts. SAGE Publications 2022-10-19 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9630854/ /pubmed/36260487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465221128581 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Lodhia, Parth
Nazari, Goris
Bryant, Dianne
Getgood, Alan
McCormack, Robert
Getgood, Alan M.J.
Bryant, Dianne M.
Litchfield, Robert
Willits, Kevin
Birmingham, Trevor
Hewison, Chris
Firth, Andrew D.
Wanlin, Stacey
Pinto, Ryan
Martindale, Ashley
O’Neill, Lindsey
Jennings, Morgan
Daniluk, Michal
McCormack, Robert G.
Boyer, Dory
Zomar, Mauri
Moon, Karyn
Moon, Raely
Fan, Brenda
Mohan, Bindu
Payne, Kyrsten
Heard, Mark
Buchko, Gregory M.
Hiemstra, Laurie A.
Kerslake, Sarah
Tynedal, Jeremy
MacDonald, Peter B.
Stranges, Greg
Mcrae, Sheila
Gullett, LeeAnne
Brown, Holly
Legary, Alexandra
Longo, Alison
Christian, Mat
Ferguson, Celeste
Rezansoff, Alex
Mohtadi, Nick
Barber, Rhamona
Chan, Denise
Campbell, Caitlin
Garven, Alexandra
Pulsifer, Karen
Mayer, Michelle
Peterson, Devin
Simunovic, Nicole
Duong, Andrew
Robinson, David
Levy, David
Skelly, Matt
Shanmugaraj, Ajaykumar
Bardana, Davide
Howells, Fiona
Tough, Murray
Spalding, Tim
Thompson, Pete
Metcalfe, Andrew
Asplin, Laura
Dube, Alisen
Clarkson, Louise
Brown, Jaclyn
Bolsover, Alison
Bradshaw, Carolyn
Belgrove, Larissa
Milan, Francis
Turner, Sylvia
Verdugo, Sarah
Lowe, Janet
Dunne, Debra
McGowan, Kerri
Suddens, Charlie-Marie
Verdonk, Peter C.M.
Declerq, Geert
Vuylsteke, Kristien
Van Haver, Mieke
Performance of 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the STABILITY Study: A Subgroup Analysis
title Performance of 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the STABILITY Study: A Subgroup Analysis
title_full Performance of 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the STABILITY Study: A Subgroup Analysis
title_fullStr Performance of 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the STABILITY Study: A Subgroup Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Performance of 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the STABILITY Study: A Subgroup Analysis
title_short Performance of 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the STABILITY Study: A Subgroup Analysis
title_sort performance of 5-strand hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the stability study: a subgroup analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36260487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465221128581
work_keys_str_mv AT lodhiaparth performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT nazarigoris performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT bryantdianne performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT getgoodalan performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT mccormackrobert performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT getgoodalanmj performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT bryantdiannem performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT litchfieldrobert performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT willitskevin performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT birminghamtrevor performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT hewisonchris performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT firthandrewd performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT wanlinstacey performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT pintoryan performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT martindaleashley performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT oneilllindsey performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT jenningsmorgan performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT danilukmichal performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT mccormackrobertg performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT boyerdory performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT zomarmauri performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT moonkaryn performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT moonraely performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT fanbrenda performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT mohanbindu performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT paynekyrsten performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT heardmark performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT buchkogregorym performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT hiemstralauriea performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT kerslakesarah performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT tynedaljeremy performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT macdonaldpeterb performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT strangesgreg performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT mcraesheila performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT gullettleeanne performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT brownholly performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT legaryalexandra performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT longoalison performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT christianmat performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT fergusonceleste performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT rezansoffalex performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT mohtadinick performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT barberrhamona performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT chandenise performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT campbellcaitlin performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT garvenalexandra performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT pulsiferkaren performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT mayermichelle performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT petersondevin performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT simunovicnicole performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT duongandrew performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT robinsondavid performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT levydavid performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT skellymatt performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT shanmugarajajaykumar performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT bardanadavide performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT howellsfiona performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT toughmurray performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT spaldingtim performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT thompsonpete performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT metcalfeandrew performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT asplinlaura performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT dubealisen performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT clarksonlouise performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT brownjaclyn performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT bolsoveralison performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT bradshawcarolyn performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT belgrovelarissa performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT milanfrancis performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT turnersylvia performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT verdugosarah performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT lowejanet performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT dunnedebra performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT mcgowankerri performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT suddenscharliemarie performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT verdonkpetercm performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT declerqgeert performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT vuylstekekristien performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis
AT vanhavermieke performanceof5strandhamstringautograftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninthestabilitystudyasubgroupanalysis