Cargando…

Theory and performance of substitution models for estimating relative causal effects in nutritional epidemiology

BACKGROUND: Estimating relative causal effects (i.e., “substitution effects”) is a common aim of nutritional research. In observational data, this is usually attempted using 1 of 2 statistical modeling approaches: the leave-one-out model and the energy partition model. Despite their widespread use,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomova, Georgia D, Gilthorpe, Mark S, Tennant, Peter W G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36223891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac188
_version_ 1784823703927783424
author Tomova, Georgia D
Gilthorpe, Mark S
Tennant, Peter W G
author_facet Tomova, Georgia D
Gilthorpe, Mark S
Tennant, Peter W G
author_sort Tomova, Georgia D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Estimating relative causal effects (i.e., “substitution effects”) is a common aim of nutritional research. In observational data, this is usually attempted using 1 of 2 statistical modeling approaches: the leave-one-out model and the energy partition model. Despite their widespread use, there are concerns that neither approach is well understood in practice. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore and illustrate the theory and performance of the leave-one-out and energy partition models for estimating substitution effects in nutritional epidemiology. METHODS: Monte Carlo data simulations were used to illustrate the theory and performance of both the leave-one-out model and energy partition model, by considering 3 broad types of causal effect estimands: 1) direct substitutions of the exposure with a single component, 2) inadvertent substitutions of the exposure with several components, and 3) average relative causal effects of the exposure instead of all other dietary sources. Models containing macronutrients, foods measured in calories, and foods measured in grams were all examined. RESULTS: The leave-one-out and energy partition models both performed equally well when the target estimand involved substituting a single exposure with a single component, provided all variables were measured in the same units. Bias occurred when the substitution involved >1 substituting component. Leave-one-out models that examined foods in mass while adjusting for total energy intake evaluated obscure estimands. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the approach, substitution models need to be constructed from clearly defined causal effect estimands. Estimands involving a single exposure and a single substituting component are typically estimated more accurately than estimands involving more complex substitutions. The practice of examining foods measured in grams or portions while adjusting for total energy intake is likely to deliver obscure relative effect estimands with unclear interpretations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9630885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96308852022-11-04 Theory and performance of substitution models for estimating relative causal effects in nutritional epidemiology Tomova, Georgia D Gilthorpe, Mark S Tennant, Peter W G Am J Clin Nutr Original Research Communications BACKGROUND: Estimating relative causal effects (i.e., “substitution effects”) is a common aim of nutritional research. In observational data, this is usually attempted using 1 of 2 statistical modeling approaches: the leave-one-out model and the energy partition model. Despite their widespread use, there are concerns that neither approach is well understood in practice. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore and illustrate the theory and performance of the leave-one-out and energy partition models for estimating substitution effects in nutritional epidemiology. METHODS: Monte Carlo data simulations were used to illustrate the theory and performance of both the leave-one-out model and energy partition model, by considering 3 broad types of causal effect estimands: 1) direct substitutions of the exposure with a single component, 2) inadvertent substitutions of the exposure with several components, and 3) average relative causal effects of the exposure instead of all other dietary sources. Models containing macronutrients, foods measured in calories, and foods measured in grams were all examined. RESULTS: The leave-one-out and energy partition models both performed equally well when the target estimand involved substituting a single exposure with a single component, provided all variables were measured in the same units. Bias occurred when the substitution involved >1 substituting component. Leave-one-out models that examined foods in mass while adjusting for total energy intake evaluated obscure estimands. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the approach, substitution models need to be constructed from clearly defined causal effect estimands. Estimands involving a single exposure and a single substituting component are typically estimated more accurately than estimands involving more complex substitutions. The practice of examining foods measured in grams or portions while adjusting for total energy intake is likely to deliver obscure relative effect estimands with unclear interpretations. Oxford University Press 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9630885/ /pubmed/36223891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac188 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Communications
Tomova, Georgia D
Gilthorpe, Mark S
Tennant, Peter W G
Theory and performance of substitution models for estimating relative causal effects in nutritional epidemiology
title Theory and performance of substitution models for estimating relative causal effects in nutritional epidemiology
title_full Theory and performance of substitution models for estimating relative causal effects in nutritional epidemiology
title_fullStr Theory and performance of substitution models for estimating relative causal effects in nutritional epidemiology
title_full_unstemmed Theory and performance of substitution models for estimating relative causal effects in nutritional epidemiology
title_short Theory and performance of substitution models for estimating relative causal effects in nutritional epidemiology
title_sort theory and performance of substitution models for estimating relative causal effects in nutritional epidemiology
topic Original Research Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36223891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac188
work_keys_str_mv AT tomovageorgiad theoryandperformanceofsubstitutionmodelsforestimatingrelativecausaleffectsinnutritionalepidemiology
AT gilthorpemarks theoryandperformanceofsubstitutionmodelsforestimatingrelativecausaleffectsinnutritionalepidemiology
AT tennantpeterwg theoryandperformanceofsubstitutionmodelsforestimatingrelativecausaleffectsinnutritionalepidemiology