Cargando…
Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders
In the DSM-5, psychiatric diagnoses are made based on self-reported symptoms and clinician-identified signs. Though helpful in choosing potential interventions based on the available regimens, this conceptualization of psychiatric diseases can limit basic science investigation into their underlying...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339844 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.886297 |
_version_ | 1784823712796639232 |
---|---|
author | Liebenow, Brittany Jones, Rachel DiMarco, Emily Trattner, Jonathan D. Humphries, Joseph Sands, L. Paul Spry, Kasey P. Johnson, Christina K. Farkas, Evelyn B. Jiang, Angela Kishida, Kenneth T. |
author_facet | Liebenow, Brittany Jones, Rachel DiMarco, Emily Trattner, Jonathan D. Humphries, Joseph Sands, L. Paul Spry, Kasey P. Johnson, Christina K. Farkas, Evelyn B. Jiang, Angela Kishida, Kenneth T. |
author_sort | Liebenow, Brittany |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the DSM-5, psychiatric diagnoses are made based on self-reported symptoms and clinician-identified signs. Though helpful in choosing potential interventions based on the available regimens, this conceptualization of psychiatric diseases can limit basic science investigation into their underlying causes. The reward prediction error (RPE) hypothesis of dopamine neuron function posits that phasic dopamine signals encode the difference between the rewards a person expects and experiences. The computational framework from which this hypothesis was derived, temporal difference reinforcement learning (TDRL), is largely focused on reward processing rather than punishment learning. Many psychiatric disorders are characterized by aberrant behaviors, expectations, reward processing, and hypothesized dopaminergic signaling, but also characterized by suffering and the inability to change one's behavior despite negative consequences. In this review, we provide an overview of the RPE theory of phasic dopamine neuron activity and review the gains that have been made through the use of computational reinforcement learning theory as a framework for understanding changes in reward processing. The relative dearth of explicit accounts of punishment learning in computational reinforcement learning theory and its application in neuroscience is highlighted as a significant gap in current computational psychiatric research. Four disorders comprise the main focus of this review: two disorders of traditionally hypothesized hyperdopaminergic function, addiction and schizophrenia, followed by two disorders of traditionally hypothesized hypodopaminergic function, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Insights gained from a reward processing based reinforcement learning framework about underlying dopaminergic mechanisms and the role of punishment learning (when available) are explored in each disorder. Concluding remarks focus on the future directions required to characterize neuropsychiatric disorders with a hypothesized cause of underlying dopaminergic transmission. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9630918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96309182022-11-04 Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders Liebenow, Brittany Jones, Rachel DiMarco, Emily Trattner, Jonathan D. Humphries, Joseph Sands, L. Paul Spry, Kasey P. Johnson, Christina K. Farkas, Evelyn B. Jiang, Angela Kishida, Kenneth T. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry In the DSM-5, psychiatric diagnoses are made based on self-reported symptoms and clinician-identified signs. Though helpful in choosing potential interventions based on the available regimens, this conceptualization of psychiatric diseases can limit basic science investigation into their underlying causes. The reward prediction error (RPE) hypothesis of dopamine neuron function posits that phasic dopamine signals encode the difference between the rewards a person expects and experiences. The computational framework from which this hypothesis was derived, temporal difference reinforcement learning (TDRL), is largely focused on reward processing rather than punishment learning. Many psychiatric disorders are characterized by aberrant behaviors, expectations, reward processing, and hypothesized dopaminergic signaling, but also characterized by suffering and the inability to change one's behavior despite negative consequences. In this review, we provide an overview of the RPE theory of phasic dopamine neuron activity and review the gains that have been made through the use of computational reinforcement learning theory as a framework for understanding changes in reward processing. The relative dearth of explicit accounts of punishment learning in computational reinforcement learning theory and its application in neuroscience is highlighted as a significant gap in current computational psychiatric research. Four disorders comprise the main focus of this review: two disorders of traditionally hypothesized hyperdopaminergic function, addiction and schizophrenia, followed by two disorders of traditionally hypothesized hypodopaminergic function, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Insights gained from a reward processing based reinforcement learning framework about underlying dopaminergic mechanisms and the role of punishment learning (when available) are explored in each disorder. Concluding remarks focus on the future directions required to characterize neuropsychiatric disorders with a hypothesized cause of underlying dopaminergic transmission. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9630918/ /pubmed/36339844 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.886297 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liebenow, Jones, DiMarco, Trattner, Humphries, Sands, Spry, Johnson, Farkas, Jiang and Kishida. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Liebenow, Brittany Jones, Rachel DiMarco, Emily Trattner, Jonathan D. Humphries, Joseph Sands, L. Paul Spry, Kasey P. Johnson, Christina K. Farkas, Evelyn B. Jiang, Angela Kishida, Kenneth T. Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders |
title | Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders |
title_full | Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders |
title_fullStr | Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders |
title_short | Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders |
title_sort | computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339844 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.886297 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liebenowbrittany computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders AT jonesrachel computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders AT dimarcoemily computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders AT trattnerjonathand computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders AT humphriesjoseph computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders AT sandslpaul computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders AT sprykaseyp computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders AT johnsonchristinak computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders AT farkasevelynb computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders AT jiangangela computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders AT kishidakennetht computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders |