Cargando…

Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders

In the DSM-5, psychiatric diagnoses are made based on self-reported symptoms and clinician-identified signs. Though helpful in choosing potential interventions based on the available regimens, this conceptualization of psychiatric diseases can limit basic science investigation into their underlying...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liebenow, Brittany, Jones, Rachel, DiMarco, Emily, Trattner, Jonathan D., Humphries, Joseph, Sands, L. Paul, Spry, Kasey P., Johnson, Christina K., Farkas, Evelyn B., Jiang, Angela, Kishida, Kenneth T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339844
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.886297
_version_ 1784823712796639232
author Liebenow, Brittany
Jones, Rachel
DiMarco, Emily
Trattner, Jonathan D.
Humphries, Joseph
Sands, L. Paul
Spry, Kasey P.
Johnson, Christina K.
Farkas, Evelyn B.
Jiang, Angela
Kishida, Kenneth T.
author_facet Liebenow, Brittany
Jones, Rachel
DiMarco, Emily
Trattner, Jonathan D.
Humphries, Joseph
Sands, L. Paul
Spry, Kasey P.
Johnson, Christina K.
Farkas, Evelyn B.
Jiang, Angela
Kishida, Kenneth T.
author_sort Liebenow, Brittany
collection PubMed
description In the DSM-5, psychiatric diagnoses are made based on self-reported symptoms and clinician-identified signs. Though helpful in choosing potential interventions based on the available regimens, this conceptualization of psychiatric diseases can limit basic science investigation into their underlying causes. The reward prediction error (RPE) hypothesis of dopamine neuron function posits that phasic dopamine signals encode the difference between the rewards a person expects and experiences. The computational framework from which this hypothesis was derived, temporal difference reinforcement learning (TDRL), is largely focused on reward processing rather than punishment learning. Many psychiatric disorders are characterized by aberrant behaviors, expectations, reward processing, and hypothesized dopaminergic signaling, but also characterized by suffering and the inability to change one's behavior despite negative consequences. In this review, we provide an overview of the RPE theory of phasic dopamine neuron activity and review the gains that have been made through the use of computational reinforcement learning theory as a framework for understanding changes in reward processing. The relative dearth of explicit accounts of punishment learning in computational reinforcement learning theory and its application in neuroscience is highlighted as a significant gap in current computational psychiatric research. Four disorders comprise the main focus of this review: two disorders of traditionally hypothesized hyperdopaminergic function, addiction and schizophrenia, followed by two disorders of traditionally hypothesized hypodopaminergic function, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Insights gained from a reward processing based reinforcement learning framework about underlying dopaminergic mechanisms and the role of punishment learning (when available) are explored in each disorder. Concluding remarks focus on the future directions required to characterize neuropsychiatric disorders with a hypothesized cause of underlying dopaminergic transmission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9630918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96309182022-11-04 Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders Liebenow, Brittany Jones, Rachel DiMarco, Emily Trattner, Jonathan D. Humphries, Joseph Sands, L. Paul Spry, Kasey P. Johnson, Christina K. Farkas, Evelyn B. Jiang, Angela Kishida, Kenneth T. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry In the DSM-5, psychiatric diagnoses are made based on self-reported symptoms and clinician-identified signs. Though helpful in choosing potential interventions based on the available regimens, this conceptualization of psychiatric diseases can limit basic science investigation into their underlying causes. The reward prediction error (RPE) hypothesis of dopamine neuron function posits that phasic dopamine signals encode the difference between the rewards a person expects and experiences. The computational framework from which this hypothesis was derived, temporal difference reinforcement learning (TDRL), is largely focused on reward processing rather than punishment learning. Many psychiatric disorders are characterized by aberrant behaviors, expectations, reward processing, and hypothesized dopaminergic signaling, but also characterized by suffering and the inability to change one's behavior despite negative consequences. In this review, we provide an overview of the RPE theory of phasic dopamine neuron activity and review the gains that have been made through the use of computational reinforcement learning theory as a framework for understanding changes in reward processing. The relative dearth of explicit accounts of punishment learning in computational reinforcement learning theory and its application in neuroscience is highlighted as a significant gap in current computational psychiatric research. Four disorders comprise the main focus of this review: two disorders of traditionally hypothesized hyperdopaminergic function, addiction and schizophrenia, followed by two disorders of traditionally hypothesized hypodopaminergic function, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Insights gained from a reward processing based reinforcement learning framework about underlying dopaminergic mechanisms and the role of punishment learning (when available) are explored in each disorder. Concluding remarks focus on the future directions required to characterize neuropsychiatric disorders with a hypothesized cause of underlying dopaminergic transmission. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9630918/ /pubmed/36339844 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.886297 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liebenow, Jones, DiMarco, Trattner, Humphries, Sands, Spry, Johnson, Farkas, Jiang and Kishida. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Liebenow, Brittany
Jones, Rachel
DiMarco, Emily
Trattner, Jonathan D.
Humphries, Joseph
Sands, L. Paul
Spry, Kasey P.
Johnson, Christina K.
Farkas, Evelyn B.
Jiang, Angela
Kishida, Kenneth T.
Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders
title Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders
title_full Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders
title_fullStr Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders
title_full_unstemmed Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders
title_short Computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders
title_sort computational reinforcement learning, reward (and punishment), and dopamine in psychiatric disorders
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339844
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.886297
work_keys_str_mv AT liebenowbrittany computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders
AT jonesrachel computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders
AT dimarcoemily computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders
AT trattnerjonathand computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders
AT humphriesjoseph computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders
AT sandslpaul computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders
AT sprykaseyp computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders
AT johnsonchristinak computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders
AT farkasevelynb computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders
AT jiangangela computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders
AT kishidakennetht computationalreinforcementlearningrewardandpunishmentanddopamineinpsychiatricdisorders