Cargando…

Prognostic impact of number of examined lymph nodes on survival of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (ANETs) is related to lymph node (LN) metastasis and other factors. However, it is unclear how the number of examined LNs (ELNs) impact on survival. AIM: To determine the factors affecting the cancer-specific survival (CSS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Rui, Xiao, Jiang-Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338239
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10906
_version_ 1784823763735412736
author Du, Rui
Xiao, Jiang-Wei
author_facet Du, Rui
Xiao, Jiang-Wei
author_sort Du, Rui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (ANETs) is related to lymph node (LN) metastasis and other factors. However, it is unclear how the number of examined LNs (ELNs) impact on survival. AIM: To determine the factors affecting the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with ANET and to evaluate the impact of the number of ELNs on survival. METHODS: A total of 4583 ANET patients were analyzed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate survival analysis was used to identify factors related to survival and the optimal number of ELNs and lymph node ratio (LNR) were determined by the Kaplan–Meier method. The survival difference was determined by CSS. RESULTS: Except for sex, the other factors, such as age, year, race, grade, histological type, stage, tumor size, ELNs, LNR, and surgery type, were associated with prognosis. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year CSS rates of ANET patients were 91.2%, 87.5, and 81.7%, respectively (median follow-up period of 31 mo and range of 0-499 mo). There was no survival difference between the two surgery types, namely, local resection and colectomy or greater, in both stratifications of tumor size ≥ 2 cm (P = 0.523) and < 2 cm (P = 0.068). In contrast to patients with a tumor size < 2 cm, those with a tumor size ≥ 2 cm were more likely to have LN metastasis (χ(2 )= 378.16, P < 0.001). The optimal number of ELNs was more than 11, 7, and 18 for all patients, node-negative patients, and node-positive patients, respectively. CSS rates of patients with a larger number of ELNs were significantly improved (≤ 10 vs ≥ 11, χ(2 )= 20.303, P < 0.001; ≤ 6 vs ≥ 7, χ(2 )= 11.569, P < 0.001; ≤ 17 vs ≥ 18, χ(2 )= 21.990, P < 0.001; respectively). ANET patients with an LNR value ≤ 0.16 were more likely to have better survival than those with values of 0.17-0.48 (χ(2 )= 48.243, P < 0.001) and 0.49-1 (χ(2 )= 168.485, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ANET ≥ 2 cm are more likely to develop LN metastasis. At least 11 ELNs are required to better evaluate the prognosis. For patients with positive LN metastasis, 18 or more LNs need to be detected and lower LNR values (LNR ≤ 0.16) indicate a better survival prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9631157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96311572022-11-04 Prognostic impact of number of examined lymph nodes on survival of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors Du, Rui Xiao, Jiang-Wei World J Clin Cases Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (ANETs) is related to lymph node (LN) metastasis and other factors. However, it is unclear how the number of examined LNs (ELNs) impact on survival. AIM: To determine the factors affecting the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with ANET and to evaluate the impact of the number of ELNs on survival. METHODS: A total of 4583 ANET patients were analyzed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate survival analysis was used to identify factors related to survival and the optimal number of ELNs and lymph node ratio (LNR) were determined by the Kaplan–Meier method. The survival difference was determined by CSS. RESULTS: Except for sex, the other factors, such as age, year, race, grade, histological type, stage, tumor size, ELNs, LNR, and surgery type, were associated with prognosis. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year CSS rates of ANET patients were 91.2%, 87.5, and 81.7%, respectively (median follow-up period of 31 mo and range of 0-499 mo). There was no survival difference between the two surgery types, namely, local resection and colectomy or greater, in both stratifications of tumor size ≥ 2 cm (P = 0.523) and < 2 cm (P = 0.068). In contrast to patients with a tumor size < 2 cm, those with a tumor size ≥ 2 cm were more likely to have LN metastasis (χ(2 )= 378.16, P < 0.001). The optimal number of ELNs was more than 11, 7, and 18 for all patients, node-negative patients, and node-positive patients, respectively. CSS rates of patients with a larger number of ELNs were significantly improved (≤ 10 vs ≥ 11, χ(2 )= 20.303, P < 0.001; ≤ 6 vs ≥ 7, χ(2 )= 11.569, P < 0.001; ≤ 17 vs ≥ 18, χ(2 )= 21.990, P < 0.001; respectively). ANET patients with an LNR value ≤ 0.16 were more likely to have better survival than those with values of 0.17-0.48 (χ(2 )= 48.243, P < 0.001) and 0.49-1 (χ(2 )= 168.485, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ANET ≥ 2 cm are more likely to develop LN metastasis. At least 11 ELNs are required to better evaluate the prognosis. For patients with positive LN metastasis, 18 or more LNs need to be detected and lower LNR values (LNR ≤ 0.16) indicate a better survival prognosis. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-10-26 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9631157/ /pubmed/36338239 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10906 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Du, Rui
Xiao, Jiang-Wei
Prognostic impact of number of examined lymph nodes on survival of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors
title Prognostic impact of number of examined lymph nodes on survival of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors
title_full Prognostic impact of number of examined lymph nodes on survival of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors
title_fullStr Prognostic impact of number of examined lymph nodes on survival of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic impact of number of examined lymph nodes on survival of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors
title_short Prognostic impact of number of examined lymph nodes on survival of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors
title_sort prognostic impact of number of examined lymph nodes on survival of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338239
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10906
work_keys_str_mv AT durui prognosticimpactofnumberofexaminedlymphnodesonsurvivalofpatientswithappendicealneuroendocrinetumors
AT xiaojiangwei prognosticimpactofnumberofexaminedlymphnodesonsurvivalofpatientswithappendicealneuroendocrinetumors