Cargando…

Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics

PURPOSE: To build machine learning models for predicting the risk of in-hospital death in patients with sepsis within 48 h, using only dynamic changes in the patient's vital signs. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study enrolled septic patients from five emergency departments (E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Chi-Yung, Kung, Chia-Te, Chen, Fu-Cheng, Chiu, I-Min, Lin, Chun-Hung Richard, Chu, Chun-Chieh, Kung, Chien Feng, Su, Chih-Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36341257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.964667
_version_ 1784823790297939968
author Cheng, Chi-Yung
Kung, Chia-Te
Chen, Fu-Cheng
Chiu, I-Min
Lin, Chun-Hung Richard
Chu, Chun-Chieh
Kung, Chien Feng
Su, Chih-Min
author_facet Cheng, Chi-Yung
Kung, Chia-Te
Chen, Fu-Cheng
Chiu, I-Min
Lin, Chun-Hung Richard
Chu, Chun-Chieh
Kung, Chien Feng
Su, Chih-Min
author_sort Cheng, Chi-Yung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To build machine learning models for predicting the risk of in-hospital death in patients with sepsis within 48 h, using only dynamic changes in the patient's vital signs. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study enrolled septic patients from five emergency departments (ED) in Taiwan. We adopted seven variables, i.e., age, sex, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. RESULTS: Among all 353,253 visits, after excluding 159,607 visits (45%), the study group consisted of 193,646 ED visits. With a leading time of 6 h, the convolutional neural networks (CNNs), long short-term memory (LSTM), and random forest (RF) had accuracy rates of 0.905, 0.817, and 0.835, respectively, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.840, 0.761, and 0.770, respectively. With a leading time of 48 h, the CNN, LSTM, and RF achieved accuracy rates of 0.828, 0759, and 0.805, respectively, and an AUC of 0.811, 0.734, and 0.776, respectively. CONCLUSION: By analyzing dynamic vital sign data, machine learning models can predict mortality in septic patients within 6 to 48 h of admission. The performance of the testing models is more accurate if the lead time is closer to the event.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9631306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96313062022-11-04 Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics Cheng, Chi-Yung Kung, Chia-Te Chen, Fu-Cheng Chiu, I-Min Lin, Chun-Hung Richard Chu, Chun-Chieh Kung, Chien Feng Su, Chih-Min Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: To build machine learning models for predicting the risk of in-hospital death in patients with sepsis within 48 h, using only dynamic changes in the patient's vital signs. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study enrolled septic patients from five emergency departments (ED) in Taiwan. We adopted seven variables, i.e., age, sex, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. RESULTS: Among all 353,253 visits, after excluding 159,607 visits (45%), the study group consisted of 193,646 ED visits. With a leading time of 6 h, the convolutional neural networks (CNNs), long short-term memory (LSTM), and random forest (RF) had accuracy rates of 0.905, 0.817, and 0.835, respectively, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.840, 0.761, and 0.770, respectively. With a leading time of 48 h, the CNN, LSTM, and RF achieved accuracy rates of 0.828, 0759, and 0.805, respectively, and an AUC of 0.811, 0.734, and 0.776, respectively. CONCLUSION: By analyzing dynamic vital sign data, machine learning models can predict mortality in septic patients within 6 to 48 h of admission. The performance of the testing models is more accurate if the lead time is closer to the event. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9631306/ /pubmed/36341257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.964667 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cheng, Kung, Chen, Chiu, Lin, Chu, Kung and Su. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Cheng, Chi-Yung
Kung, Chia-Te
Chen, Fu-Cheng
Chiu, I-Min
Lin, Chun-Hung Richard
Chu, Chun-Chieh
Kung, Chien Feng
Su, Chih-Min
Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics
title Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics
title_full Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics
title_fullStr Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics
title_short Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics
title_sort machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: analysis of vital sign dynamics
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36341257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.964667
work_keys_str_mv AT chengchiyung machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics
AT kungchiate machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics
AT chenfucheng machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics
AT chiuimin machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics
AT linchunhungrichard machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics
AT chuchunchieh machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics
AT kungchienfeng machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics
AT suchihmin machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics