Cargando…
Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics
PURPOSE: To build machine learning models for predicting the risk of in-hospital death in patients with sepsis within 48 h, using only dynamic changes in the patient's vital signs. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study enrolled septic patients from five emergency departments (E...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36341257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.964667 |
_version_ | 1784823790297939968 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Chi-Yung Kung, Chia-Te Chen, Fu-Cheng Chiu, I-Min Lin, Chun-Hung Richard Chu, Chun-Chieh Kung, Chien Feng Su, Chih-Min |
author_facet | Cheng, Chi-Yung Kung, Chia-Te Chen, Fu-Cheng Chiu, I-Min Lin, Chun-Hung Richard Chu, Chun-Chieh Kung, Chien Feng Su, Chih-Min |
author_sort | Cheng, Chi-Yung |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To build machine learning models for predicting the risk of in-hospital death in patients with sepsis within 48 h, using only dynamic changes in the patient's vital signs. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study enrolled septic patients from five emergency departments (ED) in Taiwan. We adopted seven variables, i.e., age, sex, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. RESULTS: Among all 353,253 visits, after excluding 159,607 visits (45%), the study group consisted of 193,646 ED visits. With a leading time of 6 h, the convolutional neural networks (CNNs), long short-term memory (LSTM), and random forest (RF) had accuracy rates of 0.905, 0.817, and 0.835, respectively, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.840, 0.761, and 0.770, respectively. With a leading time of 48 h, the CNN, LSTM, and RF achieved accuracy rates of 0.828, 0759, and 0.805, respectively, and an AUC of 0.811, 0.734, and 0.776, respectively. CONCLUSION: By analyzing dynamic vital sign data, machine learning models can predict mortality in septic patients within 6 to 48 h of admission. The performance of the testing models is more accurate if the lead time is closer to the event. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9631306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96313062022-11-04 Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics Cheng, Chi-Yung Kung, Chia-Te Chen, Fu-Cheng Chiu, I-Min Lin, Chun-Hung Richard Chu, Chun-Chieh Kung, Chien Feng Su, Chih-Min Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: To build machine learning models for predicting the risk of in-hospital death in patients with sepsis within 48 h, using only dynamic changes in the patient's vital signs. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study enrolled septic patients from five emergency departments (ED) in Taiwan. We adopted seven variables, i.e., age, sex, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. RESULTS: Among all 353,253 visits, after excluding 159,607 visits (45%), the study group consisted of 193,646 ED visits. With a leading time of 6 h, the convolutional neural networks (CNNs), long short-term memory (LSTM), and random forest (RF) had accuracy rates of 0.905, 0.817, and 0.835, respectively, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.840, 0.761, and 0.770, respectively. With a leading time of 48 h, the CNN, LSTM, and RF achieved accuracy rates of 0.828, 0759, and 0.805, respectively, and an AUC of 0.811, 0.734, and 0.776, respectively. CONCLUSION: By analyzing dynamic vital sign data, machine learning models can predict mortality in septic patients within 6 to 48 h of admission. The performance of the testing models is more accurate if the lead time is closer to the event. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9631306/ /pubmed/36341257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.964667 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cheng, Kung, Chen, Chiu, Lin, Chu, Kung and Su. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Cheng, Chi-Yung Kung, Chia-Te Chen, Fu-Cheng Chiu, I-Min Lin, Chun-Hung Richard Chu, Chun-Chieh Kung, Chien Feng Su, Chih-Min Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics |
title | Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics |
title_full | Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics |
title_fullStr | Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics |
title_short | Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: Analysis of vital sign dynamics |
title_sort | machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patient with sepsis: analysis of vital sign dynamics |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36341257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.964667 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengchiyung machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics AT kungchiate machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics AT chenfucheng machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics AT chiuimin machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics AT linchunhungrichard machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics AT chuchunchieh machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics AT kungchienfeng machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics AT suchihmin machinelearningmodelsforpredictinginhospitalmortalityinpatientwithsepsisanalysisofvitalsigndynamics |