Cargando…

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry

OBJECTIVES: To assess the central corneal thickness (CCT) with 5 different devices, evaluate the repeatability of the devices, and determine the possible relationship between thickness values and sex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 308 eyes of 154 patients (76 women, 78 men) between the a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Şimşek, Cem, Kaya, Cansu, Karalezli, Aylin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36317802
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.22465
_version_ 1784823832013438976
author Şimşek, Cem
Kaya, Cansu
Karalezli, Aylin
author_facet Şimşek, Cem
Kaya, Cansu
Karalezli, Aylin
author_sort Şimşek, Cem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the central corneal thickness (CCT) with 5 different devices, evaluate the repeatability of the devices, and determine the possible relationship between thickness values and sex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 308 eyes of 154 patients (76 women, 78 men) between the ages of 18-30 who presented to the Ophthalmology Clinic of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Training and Research Hospital. Autorefractor (Topcon, Japan), ultrasound pachymetry (UP) (Ceniscan, USA), high-resolution Pentacam (Oculus, USA), anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (Optovue, USA), and Spectralis AS-OCT (Heidelberg, Germany) measurements were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the study participants was 23.2±0.2 years and the mean CCT was 540±14.1 μm, with no statistically significant difference in CCT between sexes (p>0.05). Mean CCT values were 557.0±26.7 μm with the autorefractor, 543.6±32.9 μm with UP, 533.8±30.2 μm with the Oculus Pentacam, 519.8±30.1 μm with Optovue AS-OCT, and 547.5±31.6 μm with Heidelberg AS-OCT. Pairwise comparisons between devices showed that the Optovue AS-OCT gave significantly lower CCT measurements than the autorefractor and Heidelberg AS-OCT device (p=0.027 and p=0.033, respectively). The coefficient of repeatability for autorefractor, UP, high-resolution Pentacam, Optovue AS-OCT, and Heidelberg AS-OCT CCT measurements were 1.51%, 2.46%, 3.72%, 2.57%, and 3.34%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Measurements made with five different devices showed that CCT was comparable and clinically usable. However, it was determined that the Optovue AS-OCT showed lower CCT values compare to other devices. When compared in terms of repeatability, it was found to be lower in the Pentacam than other devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9631500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96315002022-11-04 Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry Şimşek, Cem Kaya, Cansu Karalezli, Aylin Turk J Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the central corneal thickness (CCT) with 5 different devices, evaluate the repeatability of the devices, and determine the possible relationship between thickness values and sex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 308 eyes of 154 patients (76 women, 78 men) between the ages of 18-30 who presented to the Ophthalmology Clinic of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Training and Research Hospital. Autorefractor (Topcon, Japan), ultrasound pachymetry (UP) (Ceniscan, USA), high-resolution Pentacam (Oculus, USA), anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (Optovue, USA), and Spectralis AS-OCT (Heidelberg, Germany) measurements were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the study participants was 23.2±0.2 years and the mean CCT was 540±14.1 μm, with no statistically significant difference in CCT between sexes (p>0.05). Mean CCT values were 557.0±26.7 μm with the autorefractor, 543.6±32.9 μm with UP, 533.8±30.2 μm with the Oculus Pentacam, 519.8±30.1 μm with Optovue AS-OCT, and 547.5±31.6 μm with Heidelberg AS-OCT. Pairwise comparisons between devices showed that the Optovue AS-OCT gave significantly lower CCT measurements than the autorefractor and Heidelberg AS-OCT device (p=0.027 and p=0.033, respectively). The coefficient of repeatability for autorefractor, UP, high-resolution Pentacam, Optovue AS-OCT, and Heidelberg AS-OCT CCT measurements were 1.51%, 2.46%, 3.72%, 2.57%, and 3.34%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Measurements made with five different devices showed that CCT was comparable and clinically usable. However, it was determined that the Optovue AS-OCT showed lower CCT values compare to other devices. When compared in terms of repeatability, it was found to be lower in the Pentacam than other devices. Galenos Publishing 2022-10 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9631500/ /pubmed/36317802 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.22465 Text en © Copyright 2022 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Şimşek, Cem
Kaya, Cansu
Karalezli, Aylin
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry
title Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry
title_full Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry
title_fullStr Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry
title_short Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry
title_sort comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with four different new devices and ultrasound pachymetry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36317802
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.22465
work_keys_str_mv AT simsekcem comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementswithfourdifferentnewdevicesandultrasoundpachymetry
AT kayacansu comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementswithfourdifferentnewdevicesandultrasoundpachymetry
AT karalezliaylin comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementswithfourdifferentnewdevicesandultrasoundpachymetry