Cargando…
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry
OBJECTIVES: To assess the central corneal thickness (CCT) with 5 different devices, evaluate the repeatability of the devices, and determine the possible relationship between thickness values and sex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 308 eyes of 154 patients (76 women, 78 men) between the a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36317802 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.22465 |
_version_ | 1784823832013438976 |
---|---|
author | Şimşek, Cem Kaya, Cansu Karalezli, Aylin |
author_facet | Şimşek, Cem Kaya, Cansu Karalezli, Aylin |
author_sort | Şimşek, Cem |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the central corneal thickness (CCT) with 5 different devices, evaluate the repeatability of the devices, and determine the possible relationship between thickness values and sex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 308 eyes of 154 patients (76 women, 78 men) between the ages of 18-30 who presented to the Ophthalmology Clinic of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Training and Research Hospital. Autorefractor (Topcon, Japan), ultrasound pachymetry (UP) (Ceniscan, USA), high-resolution Pentacam (Oculus, USA), anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (Optovue, USA), and Spectralis AS-OCT (Heidelberg, Germany) measurements were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the study participants was 23.2±0.2 years and the mean CCT was 540±14.1 μm, with no statistically significant difference in CCT between sexes (p>0.05). Mean CCT values were 557.0±26.7 μm with the autorefractor, 543.6±32.9 μm with UP, 533.8±30.2 μm with the Oculus Pentacam, 519.8±30.1 μm with Optovue AS-OCT, and 547.5±31.6 μm with Heidelberg AS-OCT. Pairwise comparisons between devices showed that the Optovue AS-OCT gave significantly lower CCT measurements than the autorefractor and Heidelberg AS-OCT device (p=0.027 and p=0.033, respectively). The coefficient of repeatability for autorefractor, UP, high-resolution Pentacam, Optovue AS-OCT, and Heidelberg AS-OCT CCT measurements were 1.51%, 2.46%, 3.72%, 2.57%, and 3.34%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Measurements made with five different devices showed that CCT was comparable and clinically usable. However, it was determined that the Optovue AS-OCT showed lower CCT values compare to other devices. When compared in terms of repeatability, it was found to be lower in the Pentacam than other devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9631500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96315002022-11-04 Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry Şimşek, Cem Kaya, Cansu Karalezli, Aylin Turk J Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the central corneal thickness (CCT) with 5 different devices, evaluate the repeatability of the devices, and determine the possible relationship between thickness values and sex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 308 eyes of 154 patients (76 women, 78 men) between the ages of 18-30 who presented to the Ophthalmology Clinic of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Training and Research Hospital. Autorefractor (Topcon, Japan), ultrasound pachymetry (UP) (Ceniscan, USA), high-resolution Pentacam (Oculus, USA), anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (Optovue, USA), and Spectralis AS-OCT (Heidelberg, Germany) measurements were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the study participants was 23.2±0.2 years and the mean CCT was 540±14.1 μm, with no statistically significant difference in CCT between sexes (p>0.05). Mean CCT values were 557.0±26.7 μm with the autorefractor, 543.6±32.9 μm with UP, 533.8±30.2 μm with the Oculus Pentacam, 519.8±30.1 μm with Optovue AS-OCT, and 547.5±31.6 μm with Heidelberg AS-OCT. Pairwise comparisons between devices showed that the Optovue AS-OCT gave significantly lower CCT measurements than the autorefractor and Heidelberg AS-OCT device (p=0.027 and p=0.033, respectively). The coefficient of repeatability for autorefractor, UP, high-resolution Pentacam, Optovue AS-OCT, and Heidelberg AS-OCT CCT measurements were 1.51%, 2.46%, 3.72%, 2.57%, and 3.34%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Measurements made with five different devices showed that CCT was comparable and clinically usable. However, it was determined that the Optovue AS-OCT showed lower CCT values compare to other devices. When compared in terms of repeatability, it was found to be lower in the Pentacam than other devices. Galenos Publishing 2022-10 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9631500/ /pubmed/36317802 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.22465 Text en © Copyright 2022 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Şimşek, Cem Kaya, Cansu Karalezli, Aylin Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry |
title | Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry |
title_full | Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry |
title_short | Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry |
title_sort | comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with four different new devices and ultrasound pachymetry |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36317802 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.22465 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simsekcem comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementswithfourdifferentnewdevicesandultrasoundpachymetry AT kayacansu comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementswithfourdifferentnewdevicesandultrasoundpachymetry AT karalezliaylin comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasurementswithfourdifferentnewdevicesandultrasoundpachymetry |