Cargando…
Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative
PURPOSE: Urgent indications for nephrolithiasis treatment include obstruction with intractable pain or renal impairment without untreated infection. Patients and hospitals may benefit from urgent primary ureteroscopy. We aimed to examine variation in urgent ureteroscopy utilization and associated ou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36326915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04203-z |
_version_ | 1784823849728081920 |
---|---|
author | DiBianco, John Michael Conrado, Bronson Daignault-Newton, Stephanie Witzke, Karla Wenzler, David Pimentel, Hector Ghani, Khurshid R. Dauw, Casey A. |
author_facet | DiBianco, John Michael Conrado, Bronson Daignault-Newton, Stephanie Witzke, Karla Wenzler, David Pimentel, Hector Ghani, Khurshid R. Dauw, Casey A. |
author_sort | DiBianco, John Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Urgent indications for nephrolithiasis treatment include obstruction with intractable pain or renal impairment without untreated infection. Patients and hospitals may benefit from urgent primary ureteroscopy. We aimed to examine variation in urgent ureteroscopy utilization and associated outcomes. METHODS: Using Reducing Operative Complications from Kidney Stones (ROCKS), we identified all ureteroscopy’s between 2016 and 2019. Cases were classified by acuity (elective versus urgent). We assessed practice/urologist variation in urgent ureteroscopy performance. We characterized patients demographic, operative and outcomes data, making bivariate comparisons with elective ureteroscopy to understand implications of urgent surgery. We performed multilevel modeling to understand factors associated with unplanned healthcare encounters after urgent ureteroscopy. RESULTS: 12,859 cases were identified from 33 practices and 204 urologists, 10,854 (84.4%) elective and 2005 (15.6%) urgent. Urgent ureteroscopy was performed on younger patients (53 vs 57, p < 0.001), with higher rates of ureteral stones (72.8% vs 56.8%, p < 0.001). Urgent ureteroscopy rates varied widely by practice (2–70%) and urologist (0–98%). Urgent ureteroscopy had higher stenting rates (77.4% vs 72.5%, p < 0.001), stone free rates (66% vs 58.4%, p < 0.001), and postoperative ED visits (11% vs 7.2%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in intraoperative complications or unplanned hospitalizations. Factors predictive of ED visits in urgent ureteroscopy included concomitant ureteral/renal stone location (OR = 1.53, CI = 1.05–2.23, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: In Michigan elective ureteroscopy is performed 5 times more frequently than urgent ureteroscopy with wide variation. Urgent ureteroscopy demonstrated low morbidity. Urgent ureteroscopy produced modestly higher stone free rates with a slightly increased frequency of unscheduled ED visits particularly for ureteral stones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9631605 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96316052022-11-03 Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative DiBianco, John Michael Conrado, Bronson Daignault-Newton, Stephanie Witzke, Karla Wenzler, David Pimentel, Hector Ghani, Khurshid R. Dauw, Casey A. World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Urgent indications for nephrolithiasis treatment include obstruction with intractable pain or renal impairment without untreated infection. Patients and hospitals may benefit from urgent primary ureteroscopy. We aimed to examine variation in urgent ureteroscopy utilization and associated outcomes. METHODS: Using Reducing Operative Complications from Kidney Stones (ROCKS), we identified all ureteroscopy’s between 2016 and 2019. Cases were classified by acuity (elective versus urgent). We assessed practice/urologist variation in urgent ureteroscopy performance. We characterized patients demographic, operative and outcomes data, making bivariate comparisons with elective ureteroscopy to understand implications of urgent surgery. We performed multilevel modeling to understand factors associated with unplanned healthcare encounters after urgent ureteroscopy. RESULTS: 12,859 cases were identified from 33 practices and 204 urologists, 10,854 (84.4%) elective and 2005 (15.6%) urgent. Urgent ureteroscopy was performed on younger patients (53 vs 57, p < 0.001), with higher rates of ureteral stones (72.8% vs 56.8%, p < 0.001). Urgent ureteroscopy rates varied widely by practice (2–70%) and urologist (0–98%). Urgent ureteroscopy had higher stenting rates (77.4% vs 72.5%, p < 0.001), stone free rates (66% vs 58.4%, p < 0.001), and postoperative ED visits (11% vs 7.2%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in intraoperative complications or unplanned hospitalizations. Factors predictive of ED visits in urgent ureteroscopy included concomitant ureteral/renal stone location (OR = 1.53, CI = 1.05–2.23, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: In Michigan elective ureteroscopy is performed 5 times more frequently than urgent ureteroscopy with wide variation. Urgent ureteroscopy demonstrated low morbidity. Urgent ureteroscopy produced modestly higher stone free rates with a slightly increased frequency of unscheduled ED visits particularly for ureteral stones. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9631605/ /pubmed/36326915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04203-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article DiBianco, John Michael Conrado, Bronson Daignault-Newton, Stephanie Witzke, Karla Wenzler, David Pimentel, Hector Ghani, Khurshid R. Dauw, Casey A. Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative |
title | Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative |
title_full | Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative |
title_fullStr | Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative |
title_full_unstemmed | Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative |
title_short | Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative |
title_sort | practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36326915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04203-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dibiancojohnmichael practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative AT conradobronson practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative AT daignaultnewtonstephanie practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative AT witzkekarla practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative AT wenzlerdavid practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative AT pimentelhector practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative AT ghanikhurshidr practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative AT dauwcaseya practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative AT practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative |