Cargando…

Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative

PURPOSE: Urgent indications for nephrolithiasis treatment include obstruction with intractable pain or renal impairment without untreated infection. Patients and hospitals may benefit from urgent primary ureteroscopy. We aimed to examine variation in urgent ureteroscopy utilization and associated ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DiBianco, John Michael, Conrado, Bronson, Daignault-Newton, Stephanie, Witzke, Karla, Wenzler, David, Pimentel, Hector, Ghani, Khurshid R., Dauw, Casey A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36326915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04203-z
_version_ 1784823849728081920
author DiBianco, John Michael
Conrado, Bronson
Daignault-Newton, Stephanie
Witzke, Karla
Wenzler, David
Pimentel, Hector
Ghani, Khurshid R.
Dauw, Casey A.
author_facet DiBianco, John Michael
Conrado, Bronson
Daignault-Newton, Stephanie
Witzke, Karla
Wenzler, David
Pimentel, Hector
Ghani, Khurshid R.
Dauw, Casey A.
author_sort DiBianco, John Michael
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Urgent indications for nephrolithiasis treatment include obstruction with intractable pain or renal impairment without untreated infection. Patients and hospitals may benefit from urgent primary ureteroscopy. We aimed to examine variation in urgent ureteroscopy utilization and associated outcomes. METHODS: Using Reducing Operative Complications from Kidney Stones (ROCKS), we identified all ureteroscopy’s between 2016 and 2019. Cases were classified by acuity (elective versus urgent). We assessed practice/urologist variation in urgent ureteroscopy performance. We characterized patients demographic, operative and outcomes data, making bivariate comparisons with elective ureteroscopy to understand implications of urgent surgery. We performed multilevel modeling to understand factors associated with unplanned healthcare encounters after urgent ureteroscopy. RESULTS: 12,859 cases were identified from 33 practices and 204 urologists, 10,854 (84.4%) elective and 2005 (15.6%) urgent. Urgent ureteroscopy was performed on younger patients (53 vs 57, p < 0.001), with higher rates of ureteral stones (72.8% vs 56.8%, p < 0.001). Urgent ureteroscopy rates varied widely by practice (2–70%) and urologist (0–98%). Urgent ureteroscopy had higher stenting rates (77.4% vs 72.5%, p < 0.001), stone free rates (66% vs 58.4%, p < 0.001), and postoperative ED visits (11% vs 7.2%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in intraoperative complications or unplanned hospitalizations. Factors predictive of ED visits in urgent ureteroscopy included concomitant ureteral/renal stone location (OR = 1.53, CI = 1.05–2.23, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: In Michigan elective ureteroscopy is performed 5 times more frequently than urgent ureteroscopy with wide variation. Urgent ureteroscopy demonstrated low morbidity. Urgent ureteroscopy produced modestly higher stone free rates with a slightly increased frequency of unscheduled ED visits particularly for ureteral stones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9631605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96316052022-11-03 Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative DiBianco, John Michael Conrado, Bronson Daignault-Newton, Stephanie Witzke, Karla Wenzler, David Pimentel, Hector Ghani, Khurshid R. Dauw, Casey A. World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Urgent indications for nephrolithiasis treatment include obstruction with intractable pain or renal impairment without untreated infection. Patients and hospitals may benefit from urgent primary ureteroscopy. We aimed to examine variation in urgent ureteroscopy utilization and associated outcomes. METHODS: Using Reducing Operative Complications from Kidney Stones (ROCKS), we identified all ureteroscopy’s between 2016 and 2019. Cases were classified by acuity (elective versus urgent). We assessed practice/urologist variation in urgent ureteroscopy performance. We characterized patients demographic, operative and outcomes data, making bivariate comparisons with elective ureteroscopy to understand implications of urgent surgery. We performed multilevel modeling to understand factors associated with unplanned healthcare encounters after urgent ureteroscopy. RESULTS: 12,859 cases were identified from 33 practices and 204 urologists, 10,854 (84.4%) elective and 2005 (15.6%) urgent. Urgent ureteroscopy was performed on younger patients (53 vs 57, p < 0.001), with higher rates of ureteral stones (72.8% vs 56.8%, p < 0.001). Urgent ureteroscopy rates varied widely by practice (2–70%) and urologist (0–98%). Urgent ureteroscopy had higher stenting rates (77.4% vs 72.5%, p < 0.001), stone free rates (66% vs 58.4%, p < 0.001), and postoperative ED visits (11% vs 7.2%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in intraoperative complications or unplanned hospitalizations. Factors predictive of ED visits in urgent ureteroscopy included concomitant ureteral/renal stone location (OR = 1.53, CI = 1.05–2.23, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: In Michigan elective ureteroscopy is performed 5 times more frequently than urgent ureteroscopy with wide variation. Urgent ureteroscopy demonstrated low morbidity. Urgent ureteroscopy produced modestly higher stone free rates with a slightly increased frequency of unscheduled ED visits particularly for ureteral stones. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9631605/ /pubmed/36326915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04203-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
DiBianco, John Michael
Conrado, Bronson
Daignault-Newton, Stephanie
Witzke, Karla
Wenzler, David
Pimentel, Hector
Ghani, Khurshid R.
Dauw, Casey A.
Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative
title Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative
title_full Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative
title_fullStr Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative
title_full_unstemmed Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative
title_short Practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative
title_sort practice patterns and outcomes of urgent versus elective ureteroscopy in a statewide surgical collaborative
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36326915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04203-z
work_keys_str_mv AT dibiancojohnmichael practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative
AT conradobronson practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative
AT daignaultnewtonstephanie practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative
AT witzkekarla practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative
AT wenzlerdavid practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative
AT pimentelhector practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative
AT ghanikhurshidr practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative
AT dauwcaseya practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative
AT practicepatternsandoutcomesofurgentversuselectiveureteroscopyinastatewidesurgicalcollaborative