Cargando…

Genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage I follicular lymphoma, compared with stage III/IV

Although the genomic and immune microenvironmental landscape of follicular lymphoma (FL) has been extensively investigated, little is known about the potential biological differences between stage I and stage III/IV disease. Using next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry, 82 FL nodal stag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Los-de Vries, G. Tjitske, Stevens, Wendy B. C., van Dijk, Erik, Langois-Jacques, Carole, Clear, Andrew J., Stathi, Phylicia, Roemer, Margaretha G. M., Mendeville, Matias, Hijmering, Nathalie J., Sander, Birgitta, Rosenwald, Andreas, Calaminici, Maria, Hoster, Eva, Hiddemann, Wolfgang, Gaulard, Philippe, Salles, Gilles, Horn, Heike, Klapper, Wolfram, Xerri, Luc, Burton, Catherine, Tooze, Reuben M., Smith, Alexandra G., Buske, Christian, Scott, David W., Natkunam, Yasodha, Advani, Ranjana, Sehn, Laurie H., Raemaekers, John, Gribben, John, Kimby, Eva, Kersten, Marie José, Maucort-Boulch, Delphine, Ylstra, Bauke, de Jong, Daphne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Hematology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35816682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008355
_version_ 1784823875430776832
author Los-de Vries, G. Tjitske
Stevens, Wendy B. C.
van Dijk, Erik
Langois-Jacques, Carole
Clear, Andrew J.
Stathi, Phylicia
Roemer, Margaretha G. M.
Mendeville, Matias
Hijmering, Nathalie J.
Sander, Birgitta
Rosenwald, Andreas
Calaminici, Maria
Hoster, Eva
Hiddemann, Wolfgang
Gaulard, Philippe
Salles, Gilles
Horn, Heike
Klapper, Wolfram
Xerri, Luc
Burton, Catherine
Tooze, Reuben M.
Smith, Alexandra G.
Buske, Christian
Scott, David W.
Natkunam, Yasodha
Advani, Ranjana
Sehn, Laurie H.
Raemaekers, John
Gribben, John
Kimby, Eva
Kersten, Marie José
Maucort-Boulch, Delphine
Ylstra, Bauke
de Jong, Daphne
author_facet Los-de Vries, G. Tjitske
Stevens, Wendy B. C.
van Dijk, Erik
Langois-Jacques, Carole
Clear, Andrew J.
Stathi, Phylicia
Roemer, Margaretha G. M.
Mendeville, Matias
Hijmering, Nathalie J.
Sander, Birgitta
Rosenwald, Andreas
Calaminici, Maria
Hoster, Eva
Hiddemann, Wolfgang
Gaulard, Philippe
Salles, Gilles
Horn, Heike
Klapper, Wolfram
Xerri, Luc
Burton, Catherine
Tooze, Reuben M.
Smith, Alexandra G.
Buske, Christian
Scott, David W.
Natkunam, Yasodha
Advani, Ranjana
Sehn, Laurie H.
Raemaekers, John
Gribben, John
Kimby, Eva
Kersten, Marie José
Maucort-Boulch, Delphine
Ylstra, Bauke
de Jong, Daphne
author_sort Los-de Vries, G. Tjitske
collection PubMed
description Although the genomic and immune microenvironmental landscape of follicular lymphoma (FL) has been extensively investigated, little is known about the potential biological differences between stage I and stage III/IV disease. Using next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry, 82 FL nodal stage I cases were analyzed and compared with 139 FL stage III/IV nodal cases. Many similarities in mutations, chromosomal copy number aberrations, and microenvironmental cell populations were detected. However, there were also significant differences in microenvironmental and genomic features. CD8(+) T cells (P = .02) and STAT6 mutations (false discovery rate [FDR] <0.001) were more frequent in stage I FL. In contrast, programmed cell death protein 1–positive T cells, CD68(+)/CD163(+) macrophages (P < .001), BCL2 translocation (BCL2trl(+)) (P < .0001), and KMT2D (FDR = 0.003) and CREBBP (FDR = 0.04) mutations were found more frequently in stage III/IV FL. Using clustering, we identified 3 clusters within stage I, and 2 clusters within stage III/IV. The BLC2trl(+) stage I cluster was comparable to the BCL2trl(+) cluster in stage III/IV. The two BCL2trl(–) stage I clusters were unique for stage I. One was enriched for CREBBP (95%) and STAT6 (64%) mutations, without BLC6 translocation (BCL6trl), whereas the BCL2trl(–) stage III/IV cluster contained BCL6trl (64%) with fewer CREBBP (45%) and STAT6 (9%) mutations. The other BCL2trl(–) stage I cluster was relatively heterogeneous with more copy number aberrations and linker histone mutations. This exploratory study shows that stage I FL is genetically heterogeneous with different underlying oncogenic pathways. Stage I FL BCL2trl(–) is likely STAT6 driven, whereas BCL2trl(–) stage III/IV appears to be more BCL6trl driven.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9631713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96317132022-11-04 Genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage I follicular lymphoma, compared with stage III/IV Los-de Vries, G. Tjitske Stevens, Wendy B. C. van Dijk, Erik Langois-Jacques, Carole Clear, Andrew J. Stathi, Phylicia Roemer, Margaretha G. M. Mendeville, Matias Hijmering, Nathalie J. Sander, Birgitta Rosenwald, Andreas Calaminici, Maria Hoster, Eva Hiddemann, Wolfgang Gaulard, Philippe Salles, Gilles Horn, Heike Klapper, Wolfram Xerri, Luc Burton, Catherine Tooze, Reuben M. Smith, Alexandra G. Buske, Christian Scott, David W. Natkunam, Yasodha Advani, Ranjana Sehn, Laurie H. Raemaekers, John Gribben, John Kimby, Eva Kersten, Marie José Maucort-Boulch, Delphine Ylstra, Bauke de Jong, Daphne Blood Adv Lymphoid Neoplasia Although the genomic and immune microenvironmental landscape of follicular lymphoma (FL) has been extensively investigated, little is known about the potential biological differences between stage I and stage III/IV disease. Using next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry, 82 FL nodal stage I cases were analyzed and compared with 139 FL stage III/IV nodal cases. Many similarities in mutations, chromosomal copy number aberrations, and microenvironmental cell populations were detected. However, there were also significant differences in microenvironmental and genomic features. CD8(+) T cells (P = .02) and STAT6 mutations (false discovery rate [FDR] <0.001) were more frequent in stage I FL. In contrast, programmed cell death protein 1–positive T cells, CD68(+)/CD163(+) macrophages (P < .001), BCL2 translocation (BCL2trl(+)) (P < .0001), and KMT2D (FDR = 0.003) and CREBBP (FDR = 0.04) mutations were found more frequently in stage III/IV FL. Using clustering, we identified 3 clusters within stage I, and 2 clusters within stage III/IV. The BLC2trl(+) stage I cluster was comparable to the BCL2trl(+) cluster in stage III/IV. The two BCL2trl(–) stage I clusters were unique for stage I. One was enriched for CREBBP (95%) and STAT6 (64%) mutations, without BLC6 translocation (BCL6trl), whereas the BCL2trl(–) stage III/IV cluster contained BCL6trl (64%) with fewer CREBBP (45%) and STAT6 (9%) mutations. The other BCL2trl(–) stage I cluster was relatively heterogeneous with more copy number aberrations and linker histone mutations. This exploratory study shows that stage I FL is genetically heterogeneous with different underlying oncogenic pathways. Stage I FL BCL2trl(–) is likely STAT6 driven, whereas BCL2trl(–) stage III/IV appears to be more BCL6trl driven. American Society of Hematology 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9631713/ /pubmed/35816682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008355 Text en © 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.
spellingShingle Lymphoid Neoplasia
Los-de Vries, G. Tjitske
Stevens, Wendy B. C.
van Dijk, Erik
Langois-Jacques, Carole
Clear, Andrew J.
Stathi, Phylicia
Roemer, Margaretha G. M.
Mendeville, Matias
Hijmering, Nathalie J.
Sander, Birgitta
Rosenwald, Andreas
Calaminici, Maria
Hoster, Eva
Hiddemann, Wolfgang
Gaulard, Philippe
Salles, Gilles
Horn, Heike
Klapper, Wolfram
Xerri, Luc
Burton, Catherine
Tooze, Reuben M.
Smith, Alexandra G.
Buske, Christian
Scott, David W.
Natkunam, Yasodha
Advani, Ranjana
Sehn, Laurie H.
Raemaekers, John
Gribben, John
Kimby, Eva
Kersten, Marie José
Maucort-Boulch, Delphine
Ylstra, Bauke
de Jong, Daphne
Genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage I follicular lymphoma, compared with stage III/IV
title Genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage I follicular lymphoma, compared with stage III/IV
title_full Genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage I follicular lymphoma, compared with stage III/IV
title_fullStr Genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage I follicular lymphoma, compared with stage III/IV
title_full_unstemmed Genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage I follicular lymphoma, compared with stage III/IV
title_short Genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage I follicular lymphoma, compared with stage III/IV
title_sort genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage i follicular lymphoma, compared with stage iii/iv
topic Lymphoid Neoplasia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35816682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008355
work_keys_str_mv AT losdevriesgtjitske genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT stevenswendybc genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT vandijkerik genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT langoisjacquescarole genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT clearandrewj genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT stathiphylicia genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT roemermargarethagm genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT mendevillematias genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT hijmeringnathaliej genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT sanderbirgitta genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT rosenwaldandreas genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT calaminicimaria genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT hostereva genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT hiddemannwolfgang genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT gaulardphilippe genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT sallesgilles genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT hornheike genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT klapperwolfram genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT xerriluc genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT burtoncatherine genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT toozereubenm genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT smithalexandrag genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT buskechristian genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT scottdavidw genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT natkunamyasodha genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT advaniranjana genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT sehnlaurieh genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT raemaekersjohn genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT gribbenjohn genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT kimbyeva genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT kerstenmariejose genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT maucortboulchdelphine genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT ylstrabauke genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv
AT dejongdaphne genomicandmicroenvironmentallandscapeofstageifollicularlymphomacomparedwithstageiiiiv