Cargando…
In Silico Investigations into the Selectivity of Psychoactive and New Psychoactive Substances in Monoamine Transporters
[Image: see text] New psychoactive substances (NPS) are a group of compounds that mimic the effects of illicit substances. A range of NPS have been shown to interact with the three main classes of monoamine transporters (DAT, NET, and SERT) to differing extents, but it is unclear why these differenc...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c02714 |
_version_ | 1784823915579703296 |
---|---|
author | Botha, Michelle J. Kirton, Stewart B. |
author_facet | Botha, Michelle J. Kirton, Stewart B. |
author_sort | Botha, Michelle J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] New psychoactive substances (NPS) are a group of compounds that mimic the effects of illicit substances. A range of NPS have been shown to interact with the three main classes of monoamine transporters (DAT, NET, and SERT) to differing extents, but it is unclear why these differences arise. To aid in understanding the differences in affinity between the classes of monoamine transporters, several in silico experiments were conducted. Docking experiments showed there was no direct correlation between a range of scoring functions and experimental activity, but Spearman ranking analysis showed a significant correlation (α = 0.1) for DAT, with the affinity ΔG (0.42), αHB (0.40), GoldScore (0.40), and PLP (0.41) scoring functions, and for DAT (0.38) and SERT (0.40) using a consensus scoring approach. Qualitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) experiments resulted in the generation of robust and predictive three-descriptor models for SERT (r(2) = 0.87, q(2) = 0.8, and test set r(2) = 0.74) and DAT (r(2) = 0.68, q(2) = 0.51, test set r(2) = 0.63). Both QSAR models described similar characteristics for binding, i.e., rigid hydrophobic molecules with a biogenic amine moiety, and were not sufficient to facilitate a deeper understanding of differences in affinity between the monoamine transporters. This contextualizes the observed promiscuity for NPS between the isoforms and highlights the difficulty in the design and development of compounds that are isoform-selective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9631908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96319082022-11-04 In Silico Investigations into the Selectivity of Psychoactive and New Psychoactive Substances in Monoamine Transporters Botha, Michelle J. Kirton, Stewart B. ACS Omega [Image: see text] New psychoactive substances (NPS) are a group of compounds that mimic the effects of illicit substances. A range of NPS have been shown to interact with the three main classes of monoamine transporters (DAT, NET, and SERT) to differing extents, but it is unclear why these differences arise. To aid in understanding the differences in affinity between the classes of monoamine transporters, several in silico experiments were conducted. Docking experiments showed there was no direct correlation between a range of scoring functions and experimental activity, but Spearman ranking analysis showed a significant correlation (α = 0.1) for DAT, with the affinity ΔG (0.42), αHB (0.40), GoldScore (0.40), and PLP (0.41) scoring functions, and for DAT (0.38) and SERT (0.40) using a consensus scoring approach. Qualitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) experiments resulted in the generation of robust and predictive three-descriptor models for SERT (r(2) = 0.87, q(2) = 0.8, and test set r(2) = 0.74) and DAT (r(2) = 0.68, q(2) = 0.51, test set r(2) = 0.63). Both QSAR models described similar characteristics for binding, i.e., rigid hydrophobic molecules with a biogenic amine moiety, and were not sufficient to facilitate a deeper understanding of differences in affinity between the monoamine transporters. This contextualizes the observed promiscuity for NPS between the isoforms and highlights the difficulty in the design and development of compounds that are isoform-selective. American Chemical Society 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9631908/ /pubmed/36340072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c02714 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Botha, Michelle J. Kirton, Stewart B. In Silico Investigations into the Selectivity of Psychoactive and New Psychoactive Substances in Monoamine Transporters |
title | In Silico Investigations
into the Selectivity of Psychoactive
and New Psychoactive Substances in Monoamine Transporters |
title_full | In Silico Investigations
into the Selectivity of Psychoactive
and New Psychoactive Substances in Monoamine Transporters |
title_fullStr | In Silico Investigations
into the Selectivity of Psychoactive
and New Psychoactive Substances in Monoamine Transporters |
title_full_unstemmed | In Silico Investigations
into the Selectivity of Psychoactive
and New Psychoactive Substances in Monoamine Transporters |
title_short | In Silico Investigations
into the Selectivity of Psychoactive
and New Psychoactive Substances in Monoamine Transporters |
title_sort | in silico investigations
into the selectivity of psychoactive
and new psychoactive substances in monoamine transporters |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c02714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bothamichellej insilicoinvestigationsintotheselectivityofpsychoactiveandnewpsychoactivesubstancesinmonoaminetransporters AT kirtonstewartb insilicoinvestigationsintotheselectivityofpsychoactiveandnewpsychoactivesubstancesinmonoaminetransporters |