Cargando…

Psychological distress and digital health service use during COVID-19: A national Australian cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to the lives and mental health of Australians. In response, health services adapted rapidly to digital modes of treatment, prevention and care. Although a large amount of research emerged in the first yea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellis, Louise A., Dammery, Genevieve, Wells, Leanne, Ansell, James, Smith, Carolynn L., Tran, Yvonne, Braithwaite, Jeffrey, Zurynski, Yvonne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339853
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1028384
_version_ 1784823920945266688
author Ellis, Louise A.
Dammery, Genevieve
Wells, Leanne
Ansell, James
Smith, Carolynn L.
Tran, Yvonne
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Zurynski, Yvonne
author_facet Ellis, Louise A.
Dammery, Genevieve
Wells, Leanne
Ansell, James
Smith, Carolynn L.
Tran, Yvonne
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Zurynski, Yvonne
author_sort Ellis, Louise A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to the lives and mental health of Australians. In response, health services adapted rapidly to digital modes of treatment, prevention and care. Although a large amount of research emerged in the first year of the pandemic, the longer-term mental health impacts, contributing factors, and population-level utilization of digital health services are unknown. METHODS: A population-based online survey of 5,100 Australians adults was conducted in October 2021. Psychological distress was assessed with the Kessler 6-item Psychological Distress Scale. Additional survey questions included use and satisfaction with digital health services. Where available, data were compared with our previous survey conducted in 2018, permitting an examination of pre- and post-pandemic digital health service utilization. RESULTS: In 2021, almost a quarter (n = 1203, 23.6%) of respondents reported serious levels of psychological distress; participants with pre-existing health related conditions, of younger age, lower educational attainment, those who lost their job or were paid fewer hours, or living in states with lockdown policies in place were at highest risk of serious psychological distress. Almost half of all respondents (n = 2177, 42.7%) reported using digital health technologies in 2021, in contrast to just 10.0% in 2018. In 2021, respondents with serious psychological distress were significantly more likely to consult with a healthcare professional via telephone/videoconferencing (P < 0.001), access healthcare via a telephone advice line (P < 0.001), or via an email or webchat advice service (P < 0.001) than those with no serious psychological distress. Those with and without psychological distress were highly satisfied with the care they received via digital health technologies in 2021. CONCLUSION: Rates of serious psychological distress during the second year of the pandemic remained high, providing further evidence for the serious impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of the general population. Those with psychological distress accessed digital mental health services and were satisfied with the care they received. The results highlight the continued need for mental health support and digital health services, particularly for people living with chronic conditions, younger adults and people most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, both in the short term and beyond.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9631931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96319312022-11-04 Psychological distress and digital health service use during COVID-19: A national Australian cross-sectional survey Ellis, Louise A. Dammery, Genevieve Wells, Leanne Ansell, James Smith, Carolynn L. Tran, Yvonne Braithwaite, Jeffrey Zurynski, Yvonne Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption to the lives and mental health of Australians. In response, health services adapted rapidly to digital modes of treatment, prevention and care. Although a large amount of research emerged in the first year of the pandemic, the longer-term mental health impacts, contributing factors, and population-level utilization of digital health services are unknown. METHODS: A population-based online survey of 5,100 Australians adults was conducted in October 2021. Psychological distress was assessed with the Kessler 6-item Psychological Distress Scale. Additional survey questions included use and satisfaction with digital health services. Where available, data were compared with our previous survey conducted in 2018, permitting an examination of pre- and post-pandemic digital health service utilization. RESULTS: In 2021, almost a quarter (n = 1203, 23.6%) of respondents reported serious levels of psychological distress; participants with pre-existing health related conditions, of younger age, lower educational attainment, those who lost their job or were paid fewer hours, or living in states with lockdown policies in place were at highest risk of serious psychological distress. Almost half of all respondents (n = 2177, 42.7%) reported using digital health technologies in 2021, in contrast to just 10.0% in 2018. In 2021, respondents with serious psychological distress were significantly more likely to consult with a healthcare professional via telephone/videoconferencing (P < 0.001), access healthcare via a telephone advice line (P < 0.001), or via an email or webchat advice service (P < 0.001) than those with no serious psychological distress. Those with and without psychological distress were highly satisfied with the care they received via digital health technologies in 2021. CONCLUSION: Rates of serious psychological distress during the second year of the pandemic remained high, providing further evidence for the serious impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of the general population. Those with psychological distress accessed digital mental health services and were satisfied with the care they received. The results highlight the continued need for mental health support and digital health services, particularly for people living with chronic conditions, younger adults and people most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, both in the short term and beyond. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9631931/ /pubmed/36339853 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1028384 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ellis, Dammery, Wells, Ansell, Smith, Tran, Braithwaite and Zurynski. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Ellis, Louise A.
Dammery, Genevieve
Wells, Leanne
Ansell, James
Smith, Carolynn L.
Tran, Yvonne
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Zurynski, Yvonne
Psychological distress and digital health service use during COVID-19: A national Australian cross-sectional survey
title Psychological distress and digital health service use during COVID-19: A national Australian cross-sectional survey
title_full Psychological distress and digital health service use during COVID-19: A national Australian cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Psychological distress and digital health service use during COVID-19: A national Australian cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Psychological distress and digital health service use during COVID-19: A national Australian cross-sectional survey
title_short Psychological distress and digital health service use during COVID-19: A national Australian cross-sectional survey
title_sort psychological distress and digital health service use during covid-19: a national australian cross-sectional survey
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339853
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1028384
work_keys_str_mv AT ellislouisea psychologicaldistressanddigitalhealthserviceuseduringcovid19anationalaustraliancrosssectionalsurvey
AT dammerygenevieve psychologicaldistressanddigitalhealthserviceuseduringcovid19anationalaustraliancrosssectionalsurvey
AT wellsleanne psychologicaldistressanddigitalhealthserviceuseduringcovid19anationalaustraliancrosssectionalsurvey
AT anselljames psychologicaldistressanddigitalhealthserviceuseduringcovid19anationalaustraliancrosssectionalsurvey
AT smithcarolynnl psychologicaldistressanddigitalhealthserviceuseduringcovid19anationalaustraliancrosssectionalsurvey
AT tranyvonne psychologicaldistressanddigitalhealthserviceuseduringcovid19anationalaustraliancrosssectionalsurvey
AT braithwaitejeffrey psychologicaldistressanddigitalhealthserviceuseduringcovid19anationalaustraliancrosssectionalsurvey
AT zurynskiyvonne psychologicaldistressanddigitalhealthserviceuseduringcovid19anationalaustraliancrosssectionalsurvey