Cargando…
Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study
BACKGROUND: Achieving herd immunity through vaccination depends upon the public’s acceptance, which in turn relies on their understanding of its risks and benefits. The fundamental objective of public health messaging on vaccines is therefore the clear communication of often complex information and,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348981 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35121 |
_version_ | 1784823924314341376 |
---|---|
author | Christensen, Bente Laydon, Daniel Chelkowski, Tadeusz Jemielniak, Dariusz Vollmer, Michaela Bhatt, Samir Krawczyk, Konrad |
author_facet | Christensen, Bente Laydon, Daniel Chelkowski, Tadeusz Jemielniak, Dariusz Vollmer, Michaela Bhatt, Samir Krawczyk, Konrad |
author_sort | Christensen, Bente |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Achieving herd immunity through vaccination depends upon the public’s acceptance, which in turn relies on their understanding of its risks and benefits. The fundamental objective of public health messaging on vaccines is therefore the clear communication of often complex information and, increasingly, the countering of misinformation. The primary outlet shaping public understanding is mainstream online news media, where coverage of COVID-19 vaccines was widespread. OBJECTIVE: We used text-mining analysis on the front pages of mainstream online news to quantify the volume and sentiment polarization of vaccine coverage. METHODS: We analyzed 28 million articles from 172 major news sources across 11 countries between July 2015 and April 2021. We employed keyword-based frequency analysis to estimate the proportion of overall articles devoted to vaccines. We performed topic detection using BERTopic and named entity recognition to identify the leading subjects and actors mentioned in the context of vaccines. We used the Vader Python module to perform sentiment polarization quantification of all collated English-language articles. RESULTS: The proportion of front-page articles mentioning vaccines increased from 0.1% to 4% with the outbreak of COVID-19. The number of negatively polarized articles increased from 6698 in 2015-2019 to 28,552 in 2020-2021. However, overall vaccine coverage before the COVID-19 pandemic was slightly negatively polarized (57% negative), whereas coverage during the pandemic was positively polarized (38% negative). CONCLUSIONS: Throughout the pandemic, vaccines have risen from a marginal to a widely discussed topic on the front pages of major news outlets. Mainstream online media has been positively polarized toward vaccines, compared with mainly negative prepandemic vaccine news. However, the pandemic was accompanied by an order-of-magnitude increase in vaccine news that, due to low prepandemic frequency, may contribute to a perceived negative sentiment. These results highlight important interactions between the volume of news and overall polarization. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first systematic text mining study of front-page vaccine news headlines in the context of COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9631944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96319442022-11-04 Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study Christensen, Bente Laydon, Daniel Chelkowski, Tadeusz Jemielniak, Dariusz Vollmer, Michaela Bhatt, Samir Krawczyk, Konrad JMIR Infodemiology Original Paper BACKGROUND: Achieving herd immunity through vaccination depends upon the public’s acceptance, which in turn relies on their understanding of its risks and benefits. The fundamental objective of public health messaging on vaccines is therefore the clear communication of often complex information and, increasingly, the countering of misinformation. The primary outlet shaping public understanding is mainstream online news media, where coverage of COVID-19 vaccines was widespread. OBJECTIVE: We used text-mining analysis on the front pages of mainstream online news to quantify the volume and sentiment polarization of vaccine coverage. METHODS: We analyzed 28 million articles from 172 major news sources across 11 countries between July 2015 and April 2021. We employed keyword-based frequency analysis to estimate the proportion of overall articles devoted to vaccines. We performed topic detection using BERTopic and named entity recognition to identify the leading subjects and actors mentioned in the context of vaccines. We used the Vader Python module to perform sentiment polarization quantification of all collated English-language articles. RESULTS: The proportion of front-page articles mentioning vaccines increased from 0.1% to 4% with the outbreak of COVID-19. The number of negatively polarized articles increased from 6698 in 2015-2019 to 28,552 in 2020-2021. However, overall vaccine coverage before the COVID-19 pandemic was slightly negatively polarized (57% negative), whereas coverage during the pandemic was positively polarized (38% negative). CONCLUSIONS: Throughout the pandemic, vaccines have risen from a marginal to a widely discussed topic on the front pages of major news outlets. Mainstream online media has been positively polarized toward vaccines, compared with mainly negative prepandemic vaccine news. However, the pandemic was accompanied by an order-of-magnitude increase in vaccine news that, due to low prepandemic frequency, may contribute to a perceived negative sentiment. These results highlight important interactions between the volume of news and overall polarization. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first systematic text mining study of front-page vaccine news headlines in the context of COVID-19. JMIR Publications 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9631944/ /pubmed/36348981 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35121 Text en ©Bente Christensen, Daniel Laydon, Tadeusz Chelkowski, Dariusz Jemielniak, Michaela Vollmer, Samir Bhatt, Konrad Krawczyk. Originally published in JMIR Infodemiology (https://infodemiology.jmir.org), 20.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Infodemiology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://infodemiology.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Christensen, Bente Laydon, Daniel Chelkowski, Tadeusz Jemielniak, Dariusz Vollmer, Michaela Bhatt, Samir Krawczyk, Konrad Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study |
title | Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study |
title_full | Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study |
title_fullStr | Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study |
title_short | Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study |
title_sort | quantifying changes in vaccine coverage in mainstream media as a result of the covid-19 outbreak: text mining study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348981 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christensenbente quantifyingchangesinvaccinecoverageinmainstreammediaasaresultofthecovid19outbreaktextminingstudy AT laydondaniel quantifyingchangesinvaccinecoverageinmainstreammediaasaresultofthecovid19outbreaktextminingstudy AT chelkowskitadeusz quantifyingchangesinvaccinecoverageinmainstreammediaasaresultofthecovid19outbreaktextminingstudy AT jemielniakdariusz quantifyingchangesinvaccinecoverageinmainstreammediaasaresultofthecovid19outbreaktextminingstudy AT vollmermichaela quantifyingchangesinvaccinecoverageinmainstreammediaasaresultofthecovid19outbreaktextminingstudy AT bhattsamir quantifyingchangesinvaccinecoverageinmainstreammediaasaresultofthecovid19outbreaktextminingstudy AT krawczykkonrad quantifyingchangesinvaccinecoverageinmainstreammediaasaresultofthecovid19outbreaktextminingstudy |