Cargando…

Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce a modified lateral approach for combined radical resection of buccal squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC) and evaluate its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes in comparison with the conventional lower-lip splitting approach. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wan, Wen-Dong, Lu, Can, yuan, Yong-Xiang, Hu, Jia-Ju, Liang, Jie, He, Cai-Yun, Huang, Yu-Qi, Su, Tong, Guo, Feng, Jiang, Can-Hua, Li, Ning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02519-1
_version_ 1784823960950538240
author Wan, Wen-Dong
Lu, Can
yuan, Yong-Xiang
Hu, Jia-Ju
Liang, Jie
He, Cai-Yun
Huang, Yu-Qi
Su, Tong
Guo, Feng
Jiang, Can-Hua
Li, Ning
author_facet Wan, Wen-Dong
Lu, Can
yuan, Yong-Xiang
Hu, Jia-Ju
Liang, Jie
He, Cai-Yun
Huang, Yu-Qi
Su, Tong
Guo, Feng
Jiang, Can-Hua
Li, Ning
author_sort Wan, Wen-Dong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce a modified lateral approach for combined radical resection of buccal squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC) and evaluate its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes in comparison with the conventional lower-lip splitting approach. METHODS: This single-center study retrospectively reviewed 80 patients with BSCC, of which 37 underwent the lateral approach and 43 underwent the conventional approach. Surgical, functional, oncological, and aesthetic evaluations, as well as follow-ups, were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Compared to the conventional approach group, the lateral approach group had a longer surgical time (P = 0.000), but there was no significant difference in other surgical and oncological parameters. Moreover, the scar in the head and neck had a significantly discreet appearance in the lateral approach group, whose satisfaction was better than those in the conventional approach group (P = 0.000). Other oral function parameters, postoperative mouth-opening, and 3-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The lateral approach could provide superior aesthetic results while maintaining equal surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes compared to the conventional approach for radical resection of BSCC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02519-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9632109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96321092022-11-04 Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes Wan, Wen-Dong Lu, Can yuan, Yong-Xiang Hu, Jia-Ju Liang, Jie He, Cai-Yun Huang, Yu-Qi Su, Tong Guo, Feng Jiang, Can-Hua Li, Ning BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce a modified lateral approach for combined radical resection of buccal squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC) and evaluate its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes in comparison with the conventional lower-lip splitting approach. METHODS: This single-center study retrospectively reviewed 80 patients with BSCC, of which 37 underwent the lateral approach and 43 underwent the conventional approach. Surgical, functional, oncological, and aesthetic evaluations, as well as follow-ups, were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Compared to the conventional approach group, the lateral approach group had a longer surgical time (P = 0.000), but there was no significant difference in other surgical and oncological parameters. Moreover, the scar in the head and neck had a significantly discreet appearance in the lateral approach group, whose satisfaction was better than those in the conventional approach group (P = 0.000). Other oral function parameters, postoperative mouth-opening, and 3-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The lateral approach could provide superior aesthetic results while maintaining equal surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes compared to the conventional approach for radical resection of BSCC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02519-1. BioMed Central 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9632109/ /pubmed/36329463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02519-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wan, Wen-Dong
Lu, Can
yuan, Yong-Xiang
Hu, Jia-Ju
Liang, Jie
He, Cai-Yun
Huang, Yu-Qi
Su, Tong
Guo, Feng
Jiang, Can-Hua
Li, Ning
Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes
title Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes
title_full Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes
title_fullStr Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes
title_short Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes
title_sort lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of bscc: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02519-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wanwendong lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes
AT lucan lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes
AT yuanyongxiang lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes
AT hujiaju lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes
AT liangjie lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes
AT hecaiyun lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes
AT huangyuqi lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes
AT sutong lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes
AT guofeng lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes
AT jiangcanhua lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes
AT lining lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes