Cargando…
Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce a modified lateral approach for combined radical resection of buccal squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC) and evaluate its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes in comparison with the conventional lower-lip splitting approach. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02519-1 |
_version_ | 1784823960950538240 |
---|---|
author | Wan, Wen-Dong Lu, Can yuan, Yong-Xiang Hu, Jia-Ju Liang, Jie He, Cai-Yun Huang, Yu-Qi Su, Tong Guo, Feng Jiang, Can-Hua Li, Ning |
author_facet | Wan, Wen-Dong Lu, Can yuan, Yong-Xiang Hu, Jia-Ju Liang, Jie He, Cai-Yun Huang, Yu-Qi Su, Tong Guo, Feng Jiang, Can-Hua Li, Ning |
author_sort | Wan, Wen-Dong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce a modified lateral approach for combined radical resection of buccal squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC) and evaluate its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes in comparison with the conventional lower-lip splitting approach. METHODS: This single-center study retrospectively reviewed 80 patients with BSCC, of which 37 underwent the lateral approach and 43 underwent the conventional approach. Surgical, functional, oncological, and aesthetic evaluations, as well as follow-ups, were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Compared to the conventional approach group, the lateral approach group had a longer surgical time (P = 0.000), but there was no significant difference in other surgical and oncological parameters. Moreover, the scar in the head and neck had a significantly discreet appearance in the lateral approach group, whose satisfaction was better than those in the conventional approach group (P = 0.000). Other oral function parameters, postoperative mouth-opening, and 3-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The lateral approach could provide superior aesthetic results while maintaining equal surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes compared to the conventional approach for radical resection of BSCC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02519-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9632109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96321092022-11-04 Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes Wan, Wen-Dong Lu, Can yuan, Yong-Xiang Hu, Jia-Ju Liang, Jie He, Cai-Yun Huang, Yu-Qi Su, Tong Guo, Feng Jiang, Can-Hua Li, Ning BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce a modified lateral approach for combined radical resection of buccal squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC) and evaluate its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes in comparison with the conventional lower-lip splitting approach. METHODS: This single-center study retrospectively reviewed 80 patients with BSCC, of which 37 underwent the lateral approach and 43 underwent the conventional approach. Surgical, functional, oncological, and aesthetic evaluations, as well as follow-ups, were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Compared to the conventional approach group, the lateral approach group had a longer surgical time (P = 0.000), but there was no significant difference in other surgical and oncological parameters. Moreover, the scar in the head and neck had a significantly discreet appearance in the lateral approach group, whose satisfaction was better than those in the conventional approach group (P = 0.000). Other oral function parameters, postoperative mouth-opening, and 3-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The lateral approach could provide superior aesthetic results while maintaining equal surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes compared to the conventional approach for radical resection of BSCC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02519-1. BioMed Central 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9632109/ /pubmed/36329463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02519-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wan, Wen-Dong Lu, Can yuan, Yong-Xiang Hu, Jia-Ju Liang, Jie He, Cai-Yun Huang, Yu-Qi Su, Tong Guo, Feng Jiang, Can-Hua Li, Ning Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes |
title | Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes |
title_full | Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes |
title_fullStr | Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes |
title_short | Lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of BSCC: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes |
title_sort | lateral approach is a more aesthetical option for radical resection of bscc: assessment of its surgical, oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02519-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanwendong lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes AT lucan lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes AT yuanyongxiang lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes AT hujiaju lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes AT liangjie lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes AT hecaiyun lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes AT huangyuqi lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes AT sutong lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes AT guofeng lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes AT jiangcanhua lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes AT lining lateralapproachisamoreaestheticaloptionforradicalresectionofbsccassessmentofitssurgicaloncologicalfunctionalandaestheticoutcomes |