Cargando…
Systematic reviews on interventions for COVID-19 have rarely graded the certainty of the evidence
BACKGROUND: Numerous systematic reviews on coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) treatment have been developed to provide syntheses of the large volume of primary studies. However, the methodological quality of most of these reviews is questionable and the results provided may therefore present bias. OB...
Autores principales: | Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, Pacheco, Rafael Leite, Latorraca, Carolina de Oliveira Cruz, Ferreira, Raphael Einsfeld Simões, Riera, Rachel |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34378740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0107.27052021 |
Ejemplares similares
-
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the use of cannabinoids in clinical practice?
por: Latorraca, Carolina de Oliveira Cruz, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
What is an “ongoing” clinical trial? An analysis of different sources
revealed heterogeneous definitions of when a clinical trial starts and ends: a
meta-research study
por: Pacheco, Rafael Leite, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Tribulus Terrestris for Female Sexual Dysfunction: A Systematic Review
por: Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for treating psoriasis?
por: Pacheco, Rafael Leite, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation?
por: Mateussi, Mariana Vendramin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)