Cargando…

Sepax-2 cell processing device: a study assessing reproducibility of concentrating thawed hematopoietic progenitor cells

BACKGROUND: Autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation is currently the standard of care for a fraction of patients with newly diagnosed myelomas and relapsed or refractory lymphomas. After high-dose chemotherapy, cryopreserved HPC are either infused directly after bedside thawin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mfarrej, Bechara, Vicari, Olivier, Ouffai, Sarah, Malenfant, Carine, Granata, Angela, Thevenet, Sophie, Chabannon, Christian, Lemarié, Claude, Calmels, Boris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03703-1
_version_ 1784824061062283264
author Mfarrej, Bechara
Vicari, Olivier
Ouffai, Sarah
Malenfant, Carine
Granata, Angela
Thevenet, Sophie
Chabannon, Christian
Lemarié, Claude
Calmels, Boris
author_facet Mfarrej, Bechara
Vicari, Olivier
Ouffai, Sarah
Malenfant, Carine
Granata, Angela
Thevenet, Sophie
Chabannon, Christian
Lemarié, Claude
Calmels, Boris
author_sort Mfarrej, Bechara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation is currently the standard of care for a fraction of patients with newly diagnosed myelomas and relapsed or refractory lymphomas. After high-dose chemotherapy, cryopreserved HPC are either infused directly after bedside thawing or washed and concentrated before infusion. We previously reported on the comparability of washing/concentrating HPC post-thaw vs. infusion without manipulation in terms of hematopoietic engraftment, yet settled for the prior favoring cell debris and DMSO removal. For almost two decades, automation of this critical step of washing/concentrating cells has been feasible. As part of continuous process verification, we aim to evaluate reproducibility of this procedure by assessing intra-batch and inter-batch variability upon concentration of thawed HPC products using the Sepax 2 S-100 cell separation system. METHODS: Autologous HPC collected from the same patient were thawed and washed either in two batches processed within a 3-4 h interval and immediately infused on the same day (intra-batch, n = 45), or in two batches on different days (inter-batch, n = 49) for those patients requiring 2 or more high-dose chemotherapy cycles. Quality attributes assessed were CD34+ cell recovery, viability and CD45+ viability; CFU assay was only performed for allogeneic grafts. RESULTS: Intra-batch and inter-batch median CD34+ cell recovery was comparable (75% vs. 73% and 77% vs. 77%, respectively). Similarly, intra-batch and inter-batch median CD45+ cell viability was comparable (79% vs. 80% and 79% vs. 78%, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis describing agreement between batches per patient revealed a bias close to 0%. Additionally, lower HPC recoveries noted in batch 1 were noted as well in batch 2, regardless of the CD34+ cell dose before cryopreservation, both intra- and inter-batch, suggesting that the quality of the collected product plays an important role in downstream recovery. Intrinsic (high mature and immature granulocyte content) and extrinsic (delay between apheresis and cryopreservation) variables of the collected product resulted in a significantly lower CD45+ viability and CD34+ cell recovery upon thawing/washing. CONCLUSIONS: Automated post-thaw HPC concentration provides reproducible cell recoveries and viabilities between different batches. Implications of this work go beyond HPC to concentrate cell suspension/products during manufacturing of cell and gene therapy products. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-022-03703-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9632571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96325712022-11-04 Sepax-2 cell processing device: a study assessing reproducibility of concentrating thawed hematopoietic progenitor cells Mfarrej, Bechara Vicari, Olivier Ouffai, Sarah Malenfant, Carine Granata, Angela Thevenet, Sophie Chabannon, Christian Lemarié, Claude Calmels, Boris J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation is currently the standard of care for a fraction of patients with newly diagnosed myelomas and relapsed or refractory lymphomas. After high-dose chemotherapy, cryopreserved HPC are either infused directly after bedside thawing or washed and concentrated before infusion. We previously reported on the comparability of washing/concentrating HPC post-thaw vs. infusion without manipulation in terms of hematopoietic engraftment, yet settled for the prior favoring cell debris and DMSO removal. For almost two decades, automation of this critical step of washing/concentrating cells has been feasible. As part of continuous process verification, we aim to evaluate reproducibility of this procedure by assessing intra-batch and inter-batch variability upon concentration of thawed HPC products using the Sepax 2 S-100 cell separation system. METHODS: Autologous HPC collected from the same patient were thawed and washed either in two batches processed within a 3-4 h interval and immediately infused on the same day (intra-batch, n = 45), or in two batches on different days (inter-batch, n = 49) for those patients requiring 2 or more high-dose chemotherapy cycles. Quality attributes assessed were CD34+ cell recovery, viability and CD45+ viability; CFU assay was only performed for allogeneic grafts. RESULTS: Intra-batch and inter-batch median CD34+ cell recovery was comparable (75% vs. 73% and 77% vs. 77%, respectively). Similarly, intra-batch and inter-batch median CD45+ cell viability was comparable (79% vs. 80% and 79% vs. 78%, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis describing agreement between batches per patient revealed a bias close to 0%. Additionally, lower HPC recoveries noted in batch 1 were noted as well in batch 2, regardless of the CD34+ cell dose before cryopreservation, both intra- and inter-batch, suggesting that the quality of the collected product plays an important role in downstream recovery. Intrinsic (high mature and immature granulocyte content) and extrinsic (delay between apheresis and cryopreservation) variables of the collected product resulted in a significantly lower CD45+ viability and CD34+ cell recovery upon thawing/washing. CONCLUSIONS: Automated post-thaw HPC concentration provides reproducible cell recoveries and viabilities between different batches. Implications of this work go beyond HPC to concentrate cell suspension/products during manufacturing of cell and gene therapy products. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-022-03703-1. BioMed Central 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9632571/ /pubmed/36329460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03703-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mfarrej, Bechara
Vicari, Olivier
Ouffai, Sarah
Malenfant, Carine
Granata, Angela
Thevenet, Sophie
Chabannon, Christian
Lemarié, Claude
Calmels, Boris
Sepax-2 cell processing device: a study assessing reproducibility of concentrating thawed hematopoietic progenitor cells
title Sepax-2 cell processing device: a study assessing reproducibility of concentrating thawed hematopoietic progenitor cells
title_full Sepax-2 cell processing device: a study assessing reproducibility of concentrating thawed hematopoietic progenitor cells
title_fullStr Sepax-2 cell processing device: a study assessing reproducibility of concentrating thawed hematopoietic progenitor cells
title_full_unstemmed Sepax-2 cell processing device: a study assessing reproducibility of concentrating thawed hematopoietic progenitor cells
title_short Sepax-2 cell processing device: a study assessing reproducibility of concentrating thawed hematopoietic progenitor cells
title_sort sepax-2 cell processing device: a study assessing reproducibility of concentrating thawed hematopoietic progenitor cells
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03703-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mfarrejbechara sepax2cellprocessingdeviceastudyassessingreproducibilityofconcentratingthawedhematopoieticprogenitorcells
AT vicariolivier sepax2cellprocessingdeviceastudyassessingreproducibilityofconcentratingthawedhematopoieticprogenitorcells
AT ouffaisarah sepax2cellprocessingdeviceastudyassessingreproducibilityofconcentratingthawedhematopoieticprogenitorcells
AT malenfantcarine sepax2cellprocessingdeviceastudyassessingreproducibilityofconcentratingthawedhematopoieticprogenitorcells
AT granataangela sepax2cellprocessingdeviceastudyassessingreproducibilityofconcentratingthawedhematopoieticprogenitorcells
AT thevenetsophie sepax2cellprocessingdeviceastudyassessingreproducibilityofconcentratingthawedhematopoieticprogenitorcells
AT chabannonchristian sepax2cellprocessingdeviceastudyassessingreproducibilityofconcentratingthawedhematopoieticprogenitorcells
AT lemarieclaude sepax2cellprocessingdeviceastudyassessingreproducibilityofconcentratingthawedhematopoieticprogenitorcells
AT calmelsboris sepax2cellprocessingdeviceastudyassessingreproducibilityofconcentratingthawedhematopoieticprogenitorcells