Cargando…

A study on the performance and cost-effectiveness of robots in replacing manual nucleic acid collection method: Experience from the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led nucleic acid collection and detection became a measure to ensure normal life in China. Considering the huge detection demand, it has emerged that robots replace manual sample collection. However, the cost-effectiveness of nucleic acid collection by robots in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chi, Zhuoyuan, Tu, Yusi, Gong, Fangfang, Tang, Wenxi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36327236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276782
_version_ 1784824105683386368
author Chi, Zhuoyuan
Tu, Yusi
Gong, Fangfang
Tang, Wenxi
author_facet Chi, Zhuoyuan
Tu, Yusi
Gong, Fangfang
Tang, Wenxi
author_sort Chi, Zhuoyuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led nucleic acid collection and detection became a measure to ensure normal life in China. Considering the huge detection demand, it has emerged that robots replace manual sample collection. However, the cost-effectiveness of nucleic acid collection by robots instead of humans remain unknown. METHODS: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Shenzhen Luohu District People’s Hospital, number 2021-LHQRMYY-KYLL-031a. All participants signed the written informed consent of this study. 273 volunteers were recruited on December 1(st) 2021 from Shenzhen and divided into six groups: one group to be sampled by robots and the others to be sampled manually with varying specifications for swab rotation and insertion time. Questionnaires were distributed to the robot group to ask them sampling feeling. The effectiveness and safety of sampling were evaluated through the sampling efficiency, adverse events and sampling feeling of different groups. The economics of the different methods were judged by comparing the sampling cost for each. RESULTS: The sampling efficiency of the robot group was 96.9%, and there was no statistically significant difference between the other five manually sampled groups (p = 0.586). There were no serious adverse events in any of the six groups, but nasal soreness and tearing did occur in all group. Of the volunteers who underwent robotic sampling, 85.94% reported that the experience was either no different or more comfortable than the manual sampling. In economic terms, a single robot used to replace medical staff for sample collection becomes economically advantageous when the working time is ≥ 455 days. If multiple robots are used to replace twice the number of manual collections, it becomes more economical at 137 days and remains so as long as the robot is used. CONCLUSIONS: It appears safe and effective for robots to replace manual sampling method. Implementation of robotic sampling is economical and feasible, and can significantly save costs when working over a long term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9632764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96327642022-11-04 A study on the performance and cost-effectiveness of robots in replacing manual nucleic acid collection method: Experience from the COVID-19 pandemic Chi, Zhuoyuan Tu, Yusi Gong, Fangfang Tang, Wenxi PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led nucleic acid collection and detection became a measure to ensure normal life in China. Considering the huge detection demand, it has emerged that robots replace manual sample collection. However, the cost-effectiveness of nucleic acid collection by robots instead of humans remain unknown. METHODS: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Shenzhen Luohu District People’s Hospital, number 2021-LHQRMYY-KYLL-031a. All participants signed the written informed consent of this study. 273 volunteers were recruited on December 1(st) 2021 from Shenzhen and divided into six groups: one group to be sampled by robots and the others to be sampled manually with varying specifications for swab rotation and insertion time. Questionnaires were distributed to the robot group to ask them sampling feeling. The effectiveness and safety of sampling were evaluated through the sampling efficiency, adverse events and sampling feeling of different groups. The economics of the different methods were judged by comparing the sampling cost for each. RESULTS: The sampling efficiency of the robot group was 96.9%, and there was no statistically significant difference between the other five manually sampled groups (p = 0.586). There were no serious adverse events in any of the six groups, but nasal soreness and tearing did occur in all group. Of the volunteers who underwent robotic sampling, 85.94% reported that the experience was either no different or more comfortable than the manual sampling. In economic terms, a single robot used to replace medical staff for sample collection becomes economically advantageous when the working time is ≥ 455 days. If multiple robots are used to replace twice the number of manual collections, it becomes more economical at 137 days and remains so as long as the robot is used. CONCLUSIONS: It appears safe and effective for robots to replace manual sampling method. Implementation of robotic sampling is economical and feasible, and can significantly save costs when working over a long term. Public Library of Science 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9632764/ /pubmed/36327236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276782 Text en © 2022 Chi et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chi, Zhuoyuan
Tu, Yusi
Gong, Fangfang
Tang, Wenxi
A study on the performance and cost-effectiveness of robots in replacing manual nucleic acid collection method: Experience from the COVID-19 pandemic
title A study on the performance and cost-effectiveness of robots in replacing manual nucleic acid collection method: Experience from the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full A study on the performance and cost-effectiveness of robots in replacing manual nucleic acid collection method: Experience from the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr A study on the performance and cost-effectiveness of robots in replacing manual nucleic acid collection method: Experience from the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed A study on the performance and cost-effectiveness of robots in replacing manual nucleic acid collection method: Experience from the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short A study on the performance and cost-effectiveness of robots in replacing manual nucleic acid collection method: Experience from the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort study on the performance and cost-effectiveness of robots in replacing manual nucleic acid collection method: experience from the covid-19 pandemic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36327236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276782
work_keys_str_mv AT chizhuoyuan astudyontheperformanceandcosteffectivenessofrobotsinreplacingmanualnucleicacidcollectionmethodexperiencefromthecovid19pandemic
AT tuyusi astudyontheperformanceandcosteffectivenessofrobotsinreplacingmanualnucleicacidcollectionmethodexperiencefromthecovid19pandemic
AT gongfangfang astudyontheperformanceandcosteffectivenessofrobotsinreplacingmanualnucleicacidcollectionmethodexperiencefromthecovid19pandemic
AT tangwenxi astudyontheperformanceandcosteffectivenessofrobotsinreplacingmanualnucleicacidcollectionmethodexperiencefromthecovid19pandemic
AT chizhuoyuan studyontheperformanceandcosteffectivenessofrobotsinreplacingmanualnucleicacidcollectionmethodexperiencefromthecovid19pandemic
AT tuyusi studyontheperformanceandcosteffectivenessofrobotsinreplacingmanualnucleicacidcollectionmethodexperiencefromthecovid19pandemic
AT gongfangfang studyontheperformanceandcosteffectivenessofrobotsinreplacingmanualnucleicacidcollectionmethodexperiencefromthecovid19pandemic
AT tangwenxi studyontheperformanceandcosteffectivenessofrobotsinreplacingmanualnucleicacidcollectionmethodexperiencefromthecovid19pandemic