Cargando…
A content analysis of 32 years of Shark Week documentaries
Despite evidence of their importance to marine ecosystems, at least 32% of all chondrichthyan species are estimated or assessed as threatened with extinction. In addition to the logistical difficulties of effectively conserving wide-ranging marine species, shark conservation is believed to have been...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36327262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256842 |
_version_ | 1784824110036025344 |
---|---|
author | Whitenack, Lisa B. Mickley, Brady L. Saltzman, Julia Kajiura, Stephen M. Macdonald, Catherine C. Shiffman, David S. |
author_facet | Whitenack, Lisa B. Mickley, Brady L. Saltzman, Julia Kajiura, Stephen M. Macdonald, Catherine C. Shiffman, David S. |
author_sort | Whitenack, Lisa B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite evidence of their importance to marine ecosystems, at least 32% of all chondrichthyan species are estimated or assessed as threatened with extinction. In addition to the logistical difficulties of effectively conserving wide-ranging marine species, shark conservation is believed to have been hindered in the past by public perceptions of sharks as dangerous to humans. Shark Week is a high-profile, international programming event that has potentially enormous influence on public perceptions of sharks, shark research, shark researchers, and shark conservation. However, Shark Week has received regular criticism for poor factual accuracy, fearmongering, bias, and inaccurate representations of science and scientists. This research analyzes the content and titles of Shark Week episodes across its entire 32 years of programming to determine if there are trends in species covered, research techniques featured, expert identity, conservation messaging, type of programming, and portrayal of sharks. We analyzed titles from 272 episodes (100%) of Shark Week programming and the content of all available (201; 73.9%) episodes. Our data demonstrate that the majority of episodes are not focused on shark bites, although such shows are common and many Shark Week programs frame sharks around fear, risk, and adrenaline. While criticisms of disproportionate attention to particular charismatic species (e.g. great whites, bull sharks, and tiger sharks) are accurate and supported by data, 79 shark species have been featured briefly at least once. Shark Week’s depictions of research and of experts are biased towards a small set of (typically visual and expensive) research methodologies and (mostly white, mostly male) experts, including presentation of many white male non-scientists as scientific experts. While sharks are more often portrayed negatively than positively, limited conservation messaging does appear in 53% of episodes analyzed. Results suggest that as a whole, while Shark Week is likely contributing to the collective public perception of sharks as bad, even relatively small alterations to programming decisions could substantially improve the presentation of sharks and shark science and conservation issues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9632781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96327812022-11-04 A content analysis of 32 years of Shark Week documentaries Whitenack, Lisa B. Mickley, Brady L. Saltzman, Julia Kajiura, Stephen M. Macdonald, Catherine C. Shiffman, David S. PLoS One Research Article Despite evidence of their importance to marine ecosystems, at least 32% of all chondrichthyan species are estimated or assessed as threatened with extinction. In addition to the logistical difficulties of effectively conserving wide-ranging marine species, shark conservation is believed to have been hindered in the past by public perceptions of sharks as dangerous to humans. Shark Week is a high-profile, international programming event that has potentially enormous influence on public perceptions of sharks, shark research, shark researchers, and shark conservation. However, Shark Week has received regular criticism for poor factual accuracy, fearmongering, bias, and inaccurate representations of science and scientists. This research analyzes the content and titles of Shark Week episodes across its entire 32 years of programming to determine if there are trends in species covered, research techniques featured, expert identity, conservation messaging, type of programming, and portrayal of sharks. We analyzed titles from 272 episodes (100%) of Shark Week programming and the content of all available (201; 73.9%) episodes. Our data demonstrate that the majority of episodes are not focused on shark bites, although such shows are common and many Shark Week programs frame sharks around fear, risk, and adrenaline. While criticisms of disproportionate attention to particular charismatic species (e.g. great whites, bull sharks, and tiger sharks) are accurate and supported by data, 79 shark species have been featured briefly at least once. Shark Week’s depictions of research and of experts are biased towards a small set of (typically visual and expensive) research methodologies and (mostly white, mostly male) experts, including presentation of many white male non-scientists as scientific experts. While sharks are more often portrayed negatively than positively, limited conservation messaging does appear in 53% of episodes analyzed. Results suggest that as a whole, while Shark Week is likely contributing to the collective public perception of sharks as bad, even relatively small alterations to programming decisions could substantially improve the presentation of sharks and shark science and conservation issues. Public Library of Science 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9632781/ /pubmed/36327262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256842 Text en © 2022 Whitenack et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Whitenack, Lisa B. Mickley, Brady L. Saltzman, Julia Kajiura, Stephen M. Macdonald, Catherine C. Shiffman, David S. A content analysis of 32 years of Shark Week documentaries |
title | A content analysis of 32 years of Shark Week documentaries |
title_full | A content analysis of 32 years of Shark Week documentaries |
title_fullStr | A content analysis of 32 years of Shark Week documentaries |
title_full_unstemmed | A content analysis of 32 years of Shark Week documentaries |
title_short | A content analysis of 32 years of Shark Week documentaries |
title_sort | content analysis of 32 years of shark week documentaries |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36327262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256842 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitenacklisab acontentanalysisof32yearsofsharkweekdocumentaries AT mickleybradyl acontentanalysisof32yearsofsharkweekdocumentaries AT saltzmanjulia acontentanalysisof32yearsofsharkweekdocumentaries AT kajiurastephenm acontentanalysisof32yearsofsharkweekdocumentaries AT macdonaldcatherinec acontentanalysisof32yearsofsharkweekdocumentaries AT shiffmandavids acontentanalysisof32yearsofsharkweekdocumentaries AT whitenacklisab contentanalysisof32yearsofsharkweekdocumentaries AT mickleybradyl contentanalysisof32yearsofsharkweekdocumentaries AT saltzmanjulia contentanalysisof32yearsofsharkweekdocumentaries AT kajiurastephenm contentanalysisof32yearsofsharkweekdocumentaries AT macdonaldcatherinec contentanalysisof32yearsofsharkweekdocumentaries AT shiffmandavids contentanalysisof32yearsofsharkweekdocumentaries |