Cargando…
Scales assessing L2 speaking anxiety: Development, validation, and application
Through featuring a historical review of the L2 speaking assessment scales applied in related studies, this paper targets at providing responses for the following three questions (a) How are the scales assessing L2 speaking anxiety developed and adapted in related research? (b) What are the frequent...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36337559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972671 |
_version_ | 1784824129406369792 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Jie |
author_facet | Gao, Jie |
author_sort | Gao, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Through featuring a historical review of the L2 speaking assessment scales applied in related studies, this paper targets at providing responses for the following three questions (a) How are the scales assessing L2 speaking anxiety developed and adapted in related research? (b) What are the frequently adopted methods for validating speaking anxiety scales? (c) How is L2 speaking anxiety represented and interpreted with a dynamic approach? Based on analyzing the development process of frequently-used scales for assessing test anxiety, foreign language classroom anxiety, and speaking anxiety, the author classified the scales into three categories: test-based scales measuring speaking anxiety, classroom-based scales measuring speaking anxiety, and activity-based scales measuring L2 speaking anxiety. As for the scale validation methods, Classical Testing Theory (CTT) and Rasch measurement were introduced as two major statistical paradigms for guaranteeing the reliability of the scales. This paper also summarizes the emerging themes generalized from research focusing speaking anxiety assessment, where the dynamic approach is discussed as a guideline to interpret the relationship among anxiety, language performance, and other factors involved in language learning. This paper ends with highlighting possible directions for anxiety-related research in the future, where technology intervention and the “positivity ratio” might become new attempts for pedagogical design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9632856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96328562022-11-04 Scales assessing L2 speaking anxiety: Development, validation, and application Gao, Jie Front Psychol Psychology Through featuring a historical review of the L2 speaking assessment scales applied in related studies, this paper targets at providing responses for the following three questions (a) How are the scales assessing L2 speaking anxiety developed and adapted in related research? (b) What are the frequently adopted methods for validating speaking anxiety scales? (c) How is L2 speaking anxiety represented and interpreted with a dynamic approach? Based on analyzing the development process of frequently-used scales for assessing test anxiety, foreign language classroom anxiety, and speaking anxiety, the author classified the scales into three categories: test-based scales measuring speaking anxiety, classroom-based scales measuring speaking anxiety, and activity-based scales measuring L2 speaking anxiety. As for the scale validation methods, Classical Testing Theory (CTT) and Rasch measurement were introduced as two major statistical paradigms for guaranteeing the reliability of the scales. This paper also summarizes the emerging themes generalized from research focusing speaking anxiety assessment, where the dynamic approach is discussed as a guideline to interpret the relationship among anxiety, language performance, and other factors involved in language learning. This paper ends with highlighting possible directions for anxiety-related research in the future, where technology intervention and the “positivity ratio” might become new attempts for pedagogical design. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9632856/ /pubmed/36337559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972671 Text en Copyright © 2022 Gao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Gao, Jie Scales assessing L2 speaking anxiety: Development, validation, and application |
title | Scales assessing L2 speaking anxiety: Development, validation, and application |
title_full | Scales assessing L2 speaking anxiety: Development, validation, and application |
title_fullStr | Scales assessing L2 speaking anxiety: Development, validation, and application |
title_full_unstemmed | Scales assessing L2 speaking anxiety: Development, validation, and application |
title_short | Scales assessing L2 speaking anxiety: Development, validation, and application |
title_sort | scales assessing l2 speaking anxiety: development, validation, and application |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36337559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaojie scalesassessingl2speakinganxietydevelopmentvalidationandapplication |