Cargando…
Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model
Vocal animals produce multiple categories of calls with high between- and within-subject variability, over which listeners must generalize to accomplish call categorization. The behavioral strategies and neural mechanisms that support this ability to generalize are largely unexplored. We previously...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36226815 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78278 |
_version_ | 1784824181059223552 |
---|---|
author | Kar, Manaswini Pernia, Marianny Williams, Kayla Parida, Satyabrata Schneider, Nathan Alan McAndrew, Madelyn Kumbam, Isha Sadagopan, Srivatsun |
author_facet | Kar, Manaswini Pernia, Marianny Williams, Kayla Parida, Satyabrata Schneider, Nathan Alan McAndrew, Madelyn Kumbam, Isha Sadagopan, Srivatsun |
author_sort | Kar, Manaswini |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vocal animals produce multiple categories of calls with high between- and within-subject variability, over which listeners must generalize to accomplish call categorization. The behavioral strategies and neural mechanisms that support this ability to generalize are largely unexplored. We previously proposed a theoretical model that accomplished call categorization by detecting features of intermediate complexity that best contrasted each call category from all other categories. We further demonstrated that some neural responses in the primary auditory cortex were consistent with such a model. Here, we asked whether a feature-based model could predict call categorization behavior. We trained both the model and guinea pigs (GPs) on call categorization tasks using natural calls. We then tested categorization by the model and GPs using temporally and spectrally altered calls. Both the model and GPs were surprisingly resilient to temporal manipulations, but sensitive to moderate frequency shifts. Critically, the model predicted about 50% of the variance in GP behavior. By adopting different model training strategies and examining features that contributed to solving specific tasks, we could gain insight into possible strategies used by animals to categorize calls. Our results validate a model that uses the detection of intermediate-complexity contrastive features to accomplish call categorization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9633061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96330612022-11-04 Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model Kar, Manaswini Pernia, Marianny Williams, Kayla Parida, Satyabrata Schneider, Nathan Alan McAndrew, Madelyn Kumbam, Isha Sadagopan, Srivatsun eLife Neuroscience Vocal animals produce multiple categories of calls with high between- and within-subject variability, over which listeners must generalize to accomplish call categorization. The behavioral strategies and neural mechanisms that support this ability to generalize are largely unexplored. We previously proposed a theoretical model that accomplished call categorization by detecting features of intermediate complexity that best contrasted each call category from all other categories. We further demonstrated that some neural responses in the primary auditory cortex were consistent with such a model. Here, we asked whether a feature-based model could predict call categorization behavior. We trained both the model and guinea pigs (GPs) on call categorization tasks using natural calls. We then tested categorization by the model and GPs using temporally and spectrally altered calls. Both the model and GPs were surprisingly resilient to temporal manipulations, but sensitive to moderate frequency shifts. Critically, the model predicted about 50% of the variance in GP behavior. By adopting different model training strategies and examining features that contributed to solving specific tasks, we could gain insight into possible strategies used by animals to categorize calls. Our results validate a model that uses the detection of intermediate-complexity contrastive features to accomplish call categorization. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9633061/ /pubmed/36226815 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78278 Text en © 2022, Kar et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Kar, Manaswini Pernia, Marianny Williams, Kayla Parida, Satyabrata Schneider, Nathan Alan McAndrew, Madelyn Kumbam, Isha Sadagopan, Srivatsun Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model |
title | Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model |
title_full | Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model |
title_fullStr | Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model |
title_full_unstemmed | Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model |
title_short | Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model |
title_sort | vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36226815 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karmanaswini vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel AT perniamarianny vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel AT williamskayla vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel AT paridasatyabrata vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel AT schneidernathanalan vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel AT mcandrewmadelyn vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel AT kumbamisha vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel AT sadagopansrivatsun vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel |