Cargando…

Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model

Vocal animals produce multiple categories of calls with high between- and within-subject variability, over which listeners must generalize to accomplish call categorization. The behavioral strategies and neural mechanisms that support this ability to generalize are largely unexplored. We previously...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kar, Manaswini, Pernia, Marianny, Williams, Kayla, Parida, Satyabrata, Schneider, Nathan Alan, McAndrew, Madelyn, Kumbam, Isha, Sadagopan, Srivatsun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36226815
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78278
_version_ 1784824181059223552
author Kar, Manaswini
Pernia, Marianny
Williams, Kayla
Parida, Satyabrata
Schneider, Nathan Alan
McAndrew, Madelyn
Kumbam, Isha
Sadagopan, Srivatsun
author_facet Kar, Manaswini
Pernia, Marianny
Williams, Kayla
Parida, Satyabrata
Schneider, Nathan Alan
McAndrew, Madelyn
Kumbam, Isha
Sadagopan, Srivatsun
author_sort Kar, Manaswini
collection PubMed
description Vocal animals produce multiple categories of calls with high between- and within-subject variability, over which listeners must generalize to accomplish call categorization. The behavioral strategies and neural mechanisms that support this ability to generalize are largely unexplored. We previously proposed a theoretical model that accomplished call categorization by detecting features of intermediate complexity that best contrasted each call category from all other categories. We further demonstrated that some neural responses in the primary auditory cortex were consistent with such a model. Here, we asked whether a feature-based model could predict call categorization behavior. We trained both the model and guinea pigs (GPs) on call categorization tasks using natural calls. We then tested categorization by the model and GPs using temporally and spectrally altered calls. Both the model and GPs were surprisingly resilient to temporal manipulations, but sensitive to moderate frequency shifts. Critically, the model predicted about 50% of the variance in GP behavior. By adopting different model training strategies and examining features that contributed to solving specific tasks, we could gain insight into possible strategies used by animals to categorize calls. Our results validate a model that uses the detection of intermediate-complexity contrastive features to accomplish call categorization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9633061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96330612022-11-04 Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model Kar, Manaswini Pernia, Marianny Williams, Kayla Parida, Satyabrata Schneider, Nathan Alan McAndrew, Madelyn Kumbam, Isha Sadagopan, Srivatsun eLife Neuroscience Vocal animals produce multiple categories of calls with high between- and within-subject variability, over which listeners must generalize to accomplish call categorization. The behavioral strategies and neural mechanisms that support this ability to generalize are largely unexplored. We previously proposed a theoretical model that accomplished call categorization by detecting features of intermediate complexity that best contrasted each call category from all other categories. We further demonstrated that some neural responses in the primary auditory cortex were consistent with such a model. Here, we asked whether a feature-based model could predict call categorization behavior. We trained both the model and guinea pigs (GPs) on call categorization tasks using natural calls. We then tested categorization by the model and GPs using temporally and spectrally altered calls. Both the model and GPs were surprisingly resilient to temporal manipulations, but sensitive to moderate frequency shifts. Critically, the model predicted about 50% of the variance in GP behavior. By adopting different model training strategies and examining features that contributed to solving specific tasks, we could gain insight into possible strategies used by animals to categorize calls. Our results validate a model that uses the detection of intermediate-complexity contrastive features to accomplish call categorization. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9633061/ /pubmed/36226815 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78278 Text en © 2022, Kar et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kar, Manaswini
Pernia, Marianny
Williams, Kayla
Parida, Satyabrata
Schneider, Nathan Alan
McAndrew, Madelyn
Kumbam, Isha
Sadagopan, Srivatsun
Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model
title Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model
title_full Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model
title_fullStr Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model
title_full_unstemmed Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model
title_short Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model
title_sort vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36226815
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78278
work_keys_str_mv AT karmanaswini vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel
AT perniamarianny vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel
AT williamskayla vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel
AT paridasatyabrata vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel
AT schneidernathanalan vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel
AT mcandrewmadelyn vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel
AT kumbamisha vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel
AT sadagopansrivatsun vocalizationcategorizationbehaviorexplainedbyafeaturebasedauditorycategorizationmodel