Cargando…

Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability

Assessing drug permeability across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is important when evaluating the abuse potential of new pharmaceuticals as well as developing novel therapeutics that target central nervous system disorders. One of the gold-standard in vivo methods for determining BBB permeability is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faramarzi, Sadegh, Kim, Marlene T., Volpe, Donna A., Cross, Kevin P., Chakravarti, Suman, Stavitskaya, Lidiya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339562
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1040838
_version_ 1784824203311054848
author Faramarzi, Sadegh
Kim, Marlene T.
Volpe, Donna A.
Cross, Kevin P.
Chakravarti, Suman
Stavitskaya, Lidiya
author_facet Faramarzi, Sadegh
Kim, Marlene T.
Volpe, Donna A.
Cross, Kevin P.
Chakravarti, Suman
Stavitskaya, Lidiya
author_sort Faramarzi, Sadegh
collection PubMed
description Assessing drug permeability across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is important when evaluating the abuse potential of new pharmaceuticals as well as developing novel therapeutics that target central nervous system disorders. One of the gold-standard in vivo methods for determining BBB permeability is rodent log BB; however, like most in vivo methods, it is time-consuming and expensive. In the present study, two statistical-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed to predict BBB permeability of drugs based on their chemical structure. The in vivo BBB permeability data were harvested for 921 compounds from publicly available literature, non-proprietary drug approval packages, and University of Washington’s Drug Interaction Database. The cross-validation performance statistics for the BBB models ranged from 82 to 85% in sensitivity and 80–83% in negative predictivity. Additionally, the performance of newly developed models was assessed using an external validation set comprised of 83 chemicals. Overall, performance of individual models ranged from 70 to 75% in sensitivity, 70–72% in negative predictivity, and 78–86% in coverage. The predictive performance was further improved to 93% in coverage by combining predictions across the two software programs. These new models can be rapidly deployed to predict blood brain barrier permeability of pharmaceutical candidates and reduce the use of experimental animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9633177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96331772022-11-04 Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability Faramarzi, Sadegh Kim, Marlene T. Volpe, Donna A. Cross, Kevin P. Chakravarti, Suman Stavitskaya, Lidiya Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Assessing drug permeability across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is important when evaluating the abuse potential of new pharmaceuticals as well as developing novel therapeutics that target central nervous system disorders. One of the gold-standard in vivo methods for determining BBB permeability is rodent log BB; however, like most in vivo methods, it is time-consuming and expensive. In the present study, two statistical-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed to predict BBB permeability of drugs based on their chemical structure. The in vivo BBB permeability data were harvested for 921 compounds from publicly available literature, non-proprietary drug approval packages, and University of Washington’s Drug Interaction Database. The cross-validation performance statistics for the BBB models ranged from 82 to 85% in sensitivity and 80–83% in negative predictivity. Additionally, the performance of newly developed models was assessed using an external validation set comprised of 83 chemicals. Overall, performance of individual models ranged from 70 to 75% in sensitivity, 70–72% in negative predictivity, and 78–86% in coverage. The predictive performance was further improved to 93% in coverage by combining predictions across the two software programs. These new models can be rapidly deployed to predict blood brain barrier permeability of pharmaceutical candidates and reduce the use of experimental animals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9633177/ /pubmed/36339562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1040838 Text en Copyright © 2022 Faramarzi, Kim, Volpe, Cross, Chakravarti and Stavitskaya. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Faramarzi, Sadegh
Kim, Marlene T.
Volpe, Donna A.
Cross, Kevin P.
Chakravarti, Suman
Stavitskaya, Lidiya
Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability
title Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability
title_full Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability
title_fullStr Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability
title_full_unstemmed Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability
title_short Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability
title_sort development of qsar models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339562
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1040838
work_keys_str_mv AT faramarzisadegh developmentofqsarmodelstopredictbloodbrainbarrierpermeability
AT kimmarlenet developmentofqsarmodelstopredictbloodbrainbarrierpermeability
AT volpedonnaa developmentofqsarmodelstopredictbloodbrainbarrierpermeability
AT crosskevinp developmentofqsarmodelstopredictbloodbrainbarrierpermeability
AT chakravartisuman developmentofqsarmodelstopredictbloodbrainbarrierpermeability
AT stavitskayalidiya developmentofqsarmodelstopredictbloodbrainbarrierpermeability