Cargando…
Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability
Assessing drug permeability across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is important when evaluating the abuse potential of new pharmaceuticals as well as developing novel therapeutics that target central nervous system disorders. One of the gold-standard in vivo methods for determining BBB permeability is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1040838 |
_version_ | 1784824203311054848 |
---|---|
author | Faramarzi, Sadegh Kim, Marlene T. Volpe, Donna A. Cross, Kevin P. Chakravarti, Suman Stavitskaya, Lidiya |
author_facet | Faramarzi, Sadegh Kim, Marlene T. Volpe, Donna A. Cross, Kevin P. Chakravarti, Suman Stavitskaya, Lidiya |
author_sort | Faramarzi, Sadegh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Assessing drug permeability across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is important when evaluating the abuse potential of new pharmaceuticals as well as developing novel therapeutics that target central nervous system disorders. One of the gold-standard in vivo methods for determining BBB permeability is rodent log BB; however, like most in vivo methods, it is time-consuming and expensive. In the present study, two statistical-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed to predict BBB permeability of drugs based on their chemical structure. The in vivo BBB permeability data were harvested for 921 compounds from publicly available literature, non-proprietary drug approval packages, and University of Washington’s Drug Interaction Database. The cross-validation performance statistics for the BBB models ranged from 82 to 85% in sensitivity and 80–83% in negative predictivity. Additionally, the performance of newly developed models was assessed using an external validation set comprised of 83 chemicals. Overall, performance of individual models ranged from 70 to 75% in sensitivity, 70–72% in negative predictivity, and 78–86% in coverage. The predictive performance was further improved to 93% in coverage by combining predictions across the two software programs. These new models can be rapidly deployed to predict blood brain barrier permeability of pharmaceutical candidates and reduce the use of experimental animals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9633177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96331772022-11-04 Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability Faramarzi, Sadegh Kim, Marlene T. Volpe, Donna A. Cross, Kevin P. Chakravarti, Suman Stavitskaya, Lidiya Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Assessing drug permeability across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is important when evaluating the abuse potential of new pharmaceuticals as well as developing novel therapeutics that target central nervous system disorders. One of the gold-standard in vivo methods for determining BBB permeability is rodent log BB; however, like most in vivo methods, it is time-consuming and expensive. In the present study, two statistical-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed to predict BBB permeability of drugs based on their chemical structure. The in vivo BBB permeability data were harvested for 921 compounds from publicly available literature, non-proprietary drug approval packages, and University of Washington’s Drug Interaction Database. The cross-validation performance statistics for the BBB models ranged from 82 to 85% in sensitivity and 80–83% in negative predictivity. Additionally, the performance of newly developed models was assessed using an external validation set comprised of 83 chemicals. Overall, performance of individual models ranged from 70 to 75% in sensitivity, 70–72% in negative predictivity, and 78–86% in coverage. The predictive performance was further improved to 93% in coverage by combining predictions across the two software programs. These new models can be rapidly deployed to predict blood brain barrier permeability of pharmaceutical candidates and reduce the use of experimental animals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9633177/ /pubmed/36339562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1040838 Text en Copyright © 2022 Faramarzi, Kim, Volpe, Cross, Chakravarti and Stavitskaya. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Faramarzi, Sadegh Kim, Marlene T. Volpe, Donna A. Cross, Kevin P. Chakravarti, Suman Stavitskaya, Lidiya Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability |
title | Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability |
title_full | Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability |
title_fullStr | Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability |
title_short | Development of QSAR models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability |
title_sort | development of qsar models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1040838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faramarzisadegh developmentofqsarmodelstopredictbloodbrainbarrierpermeability AT kimmarlenet developmentofqsarmodelstopredictbloodbrainbarrierpermeability AT volpedonnaa developmentofqsarmodelstopredictbloodbrainbarrierpermeability AT crosskevinp developmentofqsarmodelstopredictbloodbrainbarrierpermeability AT chakravartisuman developmentofqsarmodelstopredictbloodbrainbarrierpermeability AT stavitskayalidiya developmentofqsarmodelstopredictbloodbrainbarrierpermeability |