Cargando…

Revision Surgery for a Rod Fracture with Multirod Constructs Using a Posterior-Only Approach Following Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective case series. PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the clinical results of revision surgery for a rod fracture using a posterior-only approach and determine the best procedure to prevent refracture in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). OVERVIEW OF LITERATUR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamato, Yu, Hasegawa, Tomohiko, Yoshida, Go, Banno, Tomohiro, Oe, Shin, Arima, Hideyuki, Mihara, Yuki, Ushirozako, Hiroki, Yamada, Tomohiro, Watanabe, Yuh, Ide, Koichiro, Nakai, Keiichi, Kurosu, Kenta, Matsuyama, Yukihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35184521
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0244
_version_ 1784824216590221312
author Yamato, Yu
Hasegawa, Tomohiko
Yoshida, Go
Banno, Tomohiro
Oe, Shin
Arima, Hideyuki
Mihara, Yuki
Ushirozako, Hiroki
Yamada, Tomohiro
Watanabe, Yuh
Ide, Koichiro
Nakai, Keiichi
Kurosu, Kenta
Matsuyama, Yukihiro
author_facet Yamato, Yu
Hasegawa, Tomohiko
Yoshida, Go
Banno, Tomohiro
Oe, Shin
Arima, Hideyuki
Mihara, Yuki
Ushirozako, Hiroki
Yamada, Tomohiro
Watanabe, Yuh
Ide, Koichiro
Nakai, Keiichi
Kurosu, Kenta
Matsuyama, Yukihiro
author_sort Yamato, Yu
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective case series. PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the clinical results of revision surgery for a rod fracture using a posterior-only approach and determine the best procedure to prevent refracture in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: ASD affects the thoracolumbar spine and often requires surgical correction. However, surgery for extensive spinal fusion causes rod fracture, a major mechanical complication. Few studies have described the treatment methods for rod fractures. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes of revision surgery for rod fractures in patients with ASD are currently unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 404 patients who underwent corrective fusion surgery for ASD with a minimum 2-year follow-up. We studied cases of reoperation for postoperative rod fractures and investigated surgical procedure, intraoperative findings, clinical course, and rod refracture following revision surgery. RESULTS: Rod fracture was observed in 88 patients (21.8%). Fifty-three patients (average age, 68.3 years; average blood loss, 502.2 mL [% estimated blood volume=16.4%]; and operation time, 203.3 minutes) who suffered from a rod fracture at an average of 28.3 months after the primary operation underwent reoperation. Surgical invasiveness had no significant differences in total or partial rod replacement; however, the procedures with and without an anterior bone graft significantly differed. The replaced rod refractured at an average of 35.3 months after the revision surgery of five patients. The rod also refractured at a level outside multiple rods in two patients and with traumatic episodes in three patients. Three patients had bone grafts in the anterior column. CONCLUSIONS: Revision surgery involving a multirod with a posterior-only approach for a rod fracture that occurred after ASD was performed successfully. Bone grafting in the anterior column is unnecessary for patients without massive bone defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9633233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96332332022-11-14 Revision Surgery for a Rod Fracture with Multirod Constructs Using a Posterior-Only Approach Following Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity Yamato, Yu Hasegawa, Tomohiko Yoshida, Go Banno, Tomohiro Oe, Shin Arima, Hideyuki Mihara, Yuki Ushirozako, Hiroki Yamada, Tomohiro Watanabe, Yuh Ide, Koichiro Nakai, Keiichi Kurosu, Kenta Matsuyama, Yukihiro Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective case series. PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the clinical results of revision surgery for a rod fracture using a posterior-only approach and determine the best procedure to prevent refracture in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: ASD affects the thoracolumbar spine and often requires surgical correction. However, surgery for extensive spinal fusion causes rod fracture, a major mechanical complication. Few studies have described the treatment methods for rod fractures. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes of revision surgery for rod fractures in patients with ASD are currently unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 404 patients who underwent corrective fusion surgery for ASD with a minimum 2-year follow-up. We studied cases of reoperation for postoperative rod fractures and investigated surgical procedure, intraoperative findings, clinical course, and rod refracture following revision surgery. RESULTS: Rod fracture was observed in 88 patients (21.8%). Fifty-three patients (average age, 68.3 years; average blood loss, 502.2 mL [% estimated blood volume=16.4%]; and operation time, 203.3 minutes) who suffered from a rod fracture at an average of 28.3 months after the primary operation underwent reoperation. Surgical invasiveness had no significant differences in total or partial rod replacement; however, the procedures with and without an anterior bone graft significantly differed. The replaced rod refractured at an average of 35.3 months after the revision surgery of five patients. The rod also refractured at a level outside multiple rods in two patients and with traumatic episodes in three patients. Three patients had bone grafts in the anterior column. CONCLUSIONS: Revision surgery involving a multirod with a posterior-only approach for a rod fracture that occurred after ASD was performed successfully. Bone grafting in the anterior column is unnecessary for patients without massive bone defects. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2022-10 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9633233/ /pubmed/35184521 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0244 Text en Copyright © 2022 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Yamato, Yu
Hasegawa, Tomohiko
Yoshida, Go
Banno, Tomohiro
Oe, Shin
Arima, Hideyuki
Mihara, Yuki
Ushirozako, Hiroki
Yamada, Tomohiro
Watanabe, Yuh
Ide, Koichiro
Nakai, Keiichi
Kurosu, Kenta
Matsuyama, Yukihiro
Revision Surgery for a Rod Fracture with Multirod Constructs Using a Posterior-Only Approach Following Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
title Revision Surgery for a Rod Fracture with Multirod Constructs Using a Posterior-Only Approach Following Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
title_full Revision Surgery for a Rod Fracture with Multirod Constructs Using a Posterior-Only Approach Following Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
title_fullStr Revision Surgery for a Rod Fracture with Multirod Constructs Using a Posterior-Only Approach Following Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
title_full_unstemmed Revision Surgery for a Rod Fracture with Multirod Constructs Using a Posterior-Only Approach Following Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
title_short Revision Surgery for a Rod Fracture with Multirod Constructs Using a Posterior-Only Approach Following Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
title_sort revision surgery for a rod fracture with multirod constructs using a posterior-only approach following surgery for adult spinal deformity
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35184521
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0244
work_keys_str_mv AT yamatoyu revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT hasegawatomohiko revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT yoshidago revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT bannotomohiro revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT oeshin revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT arimahideyuki revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT miharayuki revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT ushirozakohiroki revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT yamadatomohiro revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT watanabeyuh revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT idekoichiro revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT nakaikeiichi revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT kurosukenta revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity
AT matsuyamayukihiro revisionsurgeryforarodfracturewithmultirodconstructsusingaposterioronlyapproachfollowingsurgeryforadultspinaldeformity