Cargando…
Is 6 Months of Antitubercular Chemotherapy as Effective as More Than 6 Months Regimen in Spinal Tuberculosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Historically, osteoarticular tuberculosis (TB), including spinal TB, was treated with prolonged course of antitubercular therapy (ATT). Due to various challenges, there has been reluctance to explore the use of short-course ATT in spinal TB. However, with the success of short-course ATT being demons...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34784702 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0104 |
_version_ | 1784824221286793216 |
---|---|
author | Aryal, Aayush Garg, Bhavuk Mehta, Nishank Shekhar, Shubhankar Gupta, Vivek |
author_facet | Aryal, Aayush Garg, Bhavuk Mehta, Nishank Shekhar, Shubhankar Gupta, Vivek |
author_sort | Aryal, Aayush |
collection | PubMed |
description | Historically, osteoarticular tuberculosis (TB), including spinal TB, was treated with prolonged course of antitubercular therapy (ATT). Due to various challenges, there has been reluctance to explore the use of short-course ATT in spinal TB. However, with the success of short-course ATT being demonstrated in other forms of extrapulmonary TB, the subject is open for debate again. Therefore, we systematically reviewed various published literature to determine whether short-course treatment regimen (6 months) of ATT provides equivalent results in terms of disease healing as long-course treatment regimen (≥9 months) in the management of spinal TB. Five electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science) and their reference lists were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials with at least 1 year of follow-up that compared short-course with standard-course ATT for treatment of spinal TB. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed, and their data were extracted. A meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence interval (CI). The outcome measure was healed status of the disease at the final follow-up. Of 331 publications identified through literature search, eight publications describing six randomized studies were included. Moreover, 375 of 414 patients (90.58%) who received 6 months of ATT had healed status at their final follow-up compared to 404 of 463 patients (87.26%) who received ≥9 months of ATT. Overall, the healed status of spinal TB was equivalent in patients in both groups (pooled relative risk, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92–1.04; p=0.439). However, there was considerable heterogeneity among the trials (I2=40.8%, p=0.149). The results suggest that the use of short-course (6 months) chemotherapy may be considered for the treatment of spinal TB in view of the similarity in the healing response achieved compared to treatment regimens of longer duration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9633251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96332512022-11-14 Is 6 Months of Antitubercular Chemotherapy as Effective as More Than 6 Months Regimen in Spinal Tuberculosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Aryal, Aayush Garg, Bhavuk Mehta, Nishank Shekhar, Shubhankar Gupta, Vivek Asian Spine J Review Article Historically, osteoarticular tuberculosis (TB), including spinal TB, was treated with prolonged course of antitubercular therapy (ATT). Due to various challenges, there has been reluctance to explore the use of short-course ATT in spinal TB. However, with the success of short-course ATT being demonstrated in other forms of extrapulmonary TB, the subject is open for debate again. Therefore, we systematically reviewed various published literature to determine whether short-course treatment regimen (6 months) of ATT provides equivalent results in terms of disease healing as long-course treatment regimen (≥9 months) in the management of spinal TB. Five electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science) and their reference lists were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials with at least 1 year of follow-up that compared short-course with standard-course ATT for treatment of spinal TB. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed, and their data were extracted. A meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence interval (CI). The outcome measure was healed status of the disease at the final follow-up. Of 331 publications identified through literature search, eight publications describing six randomized studies were included. Moreover, 375 of 414 patients (90.58%) who received 6 months of ATT had healed status at their final follow-up compared to 404 of 463 patients (87.26%) who received ≥9 months of ATT. Overall, the healed status of spinal TB was equivalent in patients in both groups (pooled relative risk, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92–1.04; p=0.439). However, there was considerable heterogeneity among the trials (I2=40.8%, p=0.149). The results suggest that the use of short-course (6 months) chemotherapy may be considered for the treatment of spinal TB in view of the similarity in the healing response achieved compared to treatment regimens of longer duration. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2022-10 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9633251/ /pubmed/34784702 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0104 Text en Copyright © 2022 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Aryal, Aayush Garg, Bhavuk Mehta, Nishank Shekhar, Shubhankar Gupta, Vivek Is 6 Months of Antitubercular Chemotherapy as Effective as More Than 6 Months Regimen in Spinal Tuberculosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Is 6 Months of Antitubercular Chemotherapy as Effective as More Than 6 Months Regimen in Spinal Tuberculosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Is 6 Months of Antitubercular Chemotherapy as Effective as More Than 6 Months Regimen in Spinal Tuberculosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Is 6 Months of Antitubercular Chemotherapy as Effective as More Than 6 Months Regimen in Spinal Tuberculosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Is 6 Months of Antitubercular Chemotherapy as Effective as More Than 6 Months Regimen in Spinal Tuberculosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Is 6 Months of Antitubercular Chemotherapy as Effective as More Than 6 Months Regimen in Spinal Tuberculosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | is 6 months of antitubercular chemotherapy as effective as more than 6 months regimen in spinal tuberculosis? a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34784702 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aryalaayush is6monthsofantitubercularchemotherapyaseffectiveasmorethan6monthsregimeninspinaltuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gargbhavuk is6monthsofantitubercularchemotherapyaseffectiveasmorethan6monthsregimeninspinaltuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mehtanishank is6monthsofantitubercularchemotherapyaseffectiveasmorethan6monthsregimeninspinaltuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shekharshubhankar is6monthsofantitubercularchemotherapyaseffectiveasmorethan6monthsregimeninspinaltuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guptavivek is6monthsofantitubercularchemotherapyaseffectiveasmorethan6monthsregimeninspinaltuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |