Cargando…

Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups–prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation

PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease lacking specific biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We evaluated the combined prognostic impact of clinical features and novel biomarkers of cell cycle-progression in age-dependent subgroups of TNBC patients. METHODS: One h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vihervuori, H., Korpinen, K., Autere, T. A., Repo, H., Talvinen, K., Kronqvist, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06767-1
_version_ 1784824251456421888
author Vihervuori, H.
Korpinen, K.
Autere, T. A.
Repo, H.
Talvinen, K.
Kronqvist, P.
author_facet Vihervuori, H.
Korpinen, K.
Autere, T. A.
Repo, H.
Talvinen, K.
Kronqvist, P.
author_sort Vihervuori, H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease lacking specific biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We evaluated the combined prognostic impact of clinical features and novel biomarkers of cell cycle-progression in age-dependent subgroups of TNBC patients. METHODS: One hundred forty seven TNBC patients with complete clinical data and up to 18 year follow-up were collected from Turku University Hospital, Finland. Eight biomarkers for cell division were immunohistochemically detected to evaluate their clinical applicability in relation to patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: Age at diagnosis was the decisive factor predicting disease-specific mortality in TNBC (p = 0.002). The established prognostic features, nodal status and Ki-67, predicted survival only when combined with age. The outcome and prognostic features differed significantly between age groups, middle-aged patients showing the most favorable outcome. Among young patients, only lack of basal differentiation predicted disease outcome, indicating 4.5-fold mortality risk (p = 0.03). Among patients aged > 57, the established prognostic features predicted disease outcome with up to 3.0-fold mortality risk for tumor size ≥ 2 cm (p = 0.001). Concerning cell proliferation, Ki-67 alone was a significant prognosticator among patients aged > 57 years (p = 0.009). Among the studied cell cycle-specific biomarkers, only geminin predicted disease outcome, indicating up to 6.2-fold increased risk of mortality for tumor size < 2 cm (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Traditional clinical features do not provide optimal prognostic characterization for all TNBC patients. Young age should be considered as an additional adverse prognostic feature in therapeutic considerations. Increased proliferation, as evaluated using Ki-67 or geminin immunohistochemistry, showed potential in detecting survival differences in subgroups of TNBC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9633490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96334902022-11-05 Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups–prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation Vihervuori, H. Korpinen, K. Autere, T. A. Repo, H. Talvinen, K. Kronqvist, P. Breast Cancer Res Treat Preclinical Study PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease lacking specific biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We evaluated the combined prognostic impact of clinical features and novel biomarkers of cell cycle-progression in age-dependent subgroups of TNBC patients. METHODS: One hundred forty seven TNBC patients with complete clinical data and up to 18 year follow-up were collected from Turku University Hospital, Finland. Eight biomarkers for cell division were immunohistochemically detected to evaluate their clinical applicability in relation to patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: Age at diagnosis was the decisive factor predicting disease-specific mortality in TNBC (p = 0.002). The established prognostic features, nodal status and Ki-67, predicted survival only when combined with age. The outcome and prognostic features differed significantly between age groups, middle-aged patients showing the most favorable outcome. Among young patients, only lack of basal differentiation predicted disease outcome, indicating 4.5-fold mortality risk (p = 0.03). Among patients aged > 57, the established prognostic features predicted disease outcome with up to 3.0-fold mortality risk for tumor size ≥ 2 cm (p = 0.001). Concerning cell proliferation, Ki-67 alone was a significant prognosticator among patients aged > 57 years (p = 0.009). Among the studied cell cycle-specific biomarkers, only geminin predicted disease outcome, indicating up to 6.2-fold increased risk of mortality for tumor size < 2 cm (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Traditional clinical features do not provide optimal prognostic characterization for all TNBC patients. Young age should be considered as an additional adverse prognostic feature in therapeutic considerations. Increased proliferation, as evaluated using Ki-67 or geminin immunohistochemistry, showed potential in detecting survival differences in subgroups of TNBC. Springer US 2022-10-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9633490/ /pubmed/36261751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06767-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Preclinical Study
Vihervuori, H.
Korpinen, K.
Autere, T. A.
Repo, H.
Talvinen, K.
Kronqvist, P.
Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups–prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation
title Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups–prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation
title_full Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups–prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation
title_fullStr Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups–prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation
title_full_unstemmed Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups–prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation
title_short Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups–prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation
title_sort varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups–prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation
topic Preclinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06767-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vihervuorih varyingoutcomesoftriplenegativebreastcancerindifferentagegroupsprognosticvalueofclinicalfeaturesandproliferation
AT korpinenk varyingoutcomesoftriplenegativebreastcancerindifferentagegroupsprognosticvalueofclinicalfeaturesandproliferation
AT autereta varyingoutcomesoftriplenegativebreastcancerindifferentagegroupsprognosticvalueofclinicalfeaturesandproliferation
AT repoh varyingoutcomesoftriplenegativebreastcancerindifferentagegroupsprognosticvalueofclinicalfeaturesandproliferation
AT talvinenk varyingoutcomesoftriplenegativebreastcancerindifferentagegroupsprognosticvalueofclinicalfeaturesandproliferation
AT kronqvistp varyingoutcomesoftriplenegativebreastcancerindifferentagegroupsprognosticvalueofclinicalfeaturesandproliferation