Cargando…

Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future

BACKGROUND: Women undergoing induction of labor should be empowered with accurate information. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of and indications for induction of labor and delivery outcomes to help inform practice and counseling. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCarthy, Claire Marie, Meaney, Sarah, McCarthy, Michelle, Conners, Nicole, Russell, Noirin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100099
_version_ 1784824303339962368
author McCarthy, Claire Marie
Meaney, Sarah
McCarthy, Michelle
Conners, Nicole
Russell, Noirin
author_facet McCarthy, Claire Marie
Meaney, Sarah
McCarthy, Michelle
Conners, Nicole
Russell, Noirin
author_sort McCarthy, Claire Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women undergoing induction of labor should be empowered with accurate information. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of and indications for induction of labor and delivery outcomes to help inform practice and counseling. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor over a 3-month period in a tertiary-level hospital in the Republic of Ireland. Data were obtained from paper and electronic registries. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed on data collected. RESULTS: There were 1084 women delivered, with an induction rate of 46.0% (n=499). Primiparous women were more likely to be induced compared with multiparous women (51.4%; n=254/494 vs 41.5%; n=245/590; P<.001), and were more likely to be induced for postmaturity (30.7%; n=78/254 vs 23.6%; 58/245; P≤.001). More than half (50.3%; 251/399) were induced before 40 weeks’ gestation, irrespective of parity. Multiparous women and those induced for maternal medical indications had a shorter overall time to delivery interval (21.7 hours [standard deviation, 13.0] vs 13.8 hours [standard deviation, 11.2]; P<.001 and 18.3 hours [standard deviation, 12.7] vs 14.7 hours [standard deviation, 12.4]; P<.01). CONCLUSION: Information on induction of labor can aid in the guidance and education of women undergoing the process, educate clinicians for appropriate counseling, and facilitate shared decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9633735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96337352022-11-05 Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future McCarthy, Claire Marie Meaney, Sarah McCarthy, Michelle Conners, Nicole Russell, Noirin AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Women undergoing induction of labor should be empowered with accurate information. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of and indications for induction of labor and delivery outcomes to help inform practice and counseling. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor over a 3-month period in a tertiary-level hospital in the Republic of Ireland. Data were obtained from paper and electronic registries. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed on data collected. RESULTS: There were 1084 women delivered, with an induction rate of 46.0% (n=499). Primiparous women were more likely to be induced compared with multiparous women (51.4%; n=254/494 vs 41.5%; n=245/590; P<.001), and were more likely to be induced for postmaturity (30.7%; n=78/254 vs 23.6%; 58/245; P≤.001). More than half (50.3%; 251/399) were induced before 40 weeks’ gestation, irrespective of parity. Multiparous women and those induced for maternal medical indications had a shorter overall time to delivery interval (21.7 hours [standard deviation, 13.0] vs 13.8 hours [standard deviation, 11.2]; P<.001 and 18.3 hours [standard deviation, 12.7] vs 14.7 hours [standard deviation, 12.4]; P<.01). CONCLUSION: Information on induction of labor can aid in the guidance and education of women undergoing the process, educate clinicians for appropriate counseling, and facilitate shared decision-making. Elsevier 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9633735/ /pubmed/36338538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100099 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
McCarthy, Claire Marie
Meaney, Sarah
McCarthy, Michelle
Conners, Nicole
Russell, Noirin
Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future
title Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future
title_full Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future
title_fullStr Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future
title_full_unstemmed Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future
title_short Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future
title_sort induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100099
work_keys_str_mv AT mccarthyclairemarie inductionoflaborreviewingthepasttoimprovethefuture
AT meaneysarah inductionoflaborreviewingthepasttoimprovethefuture
AT mccarthymichelle inductionoflaborreviewingthepasttoimprovethefuture
AT connersnicole inductionoflaborreviewingthepasttoimprovethefuture
AT russellnoirin inductionoflaborreviewingthepasttoimprovethefuture