Cargando…
Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future
BACKGROUND: Women undergoing induction of labor should be empowered with accurate information. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of and indications for induction of labor and delivery outcomes to help inform practice and counseling. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100099 |
_version_ | 1784824303339962368 |
---|---|
author | McCarthy, Claire Marie Meaney, Sarah McCarthy, Michelle Conners, Nicole Russell, Noirin |
author_facet | McCarthy, Claire Marie Meaney, Sarah McCarthy, Michelle Conners, Nicole Russell, Noirin |
author_sort | McCarthy, Claire Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Women undergoing induction of labor should be empowered with accurate information. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of and indications for induction of labor and delivery outcomes to help inform practice and counseling. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor over a 3-month period in a tertiary-level hospital in the Republic of Ireland. Data were obtained from paper and electronic registries. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed on data collected. RESULTS: There were 1084 women delivered, with an induction rate of 46.0% (n=499). Primiparous women were more likely to be induced compared with multiparous women (51.4%; n=254/494 vs 41.5%; n=245/590; P<.001), and were more likely to be induced for postmaturity (30.7%; n=78/254 vs 23.6%; 58/245; P≤.001). More than half (50.3%; 251/399) were induced before 40 weeks’ gestation, irrespective of parity. Multiparous women and those induced for maternal medical indications had a shorter overall time to delivery interval (21.7 hours [standard deviation, 13.0] vs 13.8 hours [standard deviation, 11.2]; P<.001 and 18.3 hours [standard deviation, 12.7] vs 14.7 hours [standard deviation, 12.4]; P<.01). CONCLUSION: Information on induction of labor can aid in the guidance and education of women undergoing the process, educate clinicians for appropriate counseling, and facilitate shared decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9633735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96337352022-11-05 Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future McCarthy, Claire Marie Meaney, Sarah McCarthy, Michelle Conners, Nicole Russell, Noirin AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Women undergoing induction of labor should be empowered with accurate information. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of and indications for induction of labor and delivery outcomes to help inform practice and counseling. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor over a 3-month period in a tertiary-level hospital in the Republic of Ireland. Data were obtained from paper and electronic registries. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed on data collected. RESULTS: There were 1084 women delivered, with an induction rate of 46.0% (n=499). Primiparous women were more likely to be induced compared with multiparous women (51.4%; n=254/494 vs 41.5%; n=245/590; P<.001), and were more likely to be induced for postmaturity (30.7%; n=78/254 vs 23.6%; 58/245; P≤.001). More than half (50.3%; 251/399) were induced before 40 weeks’ gestation, irrespective of parity. Multiparous women and those induced for maternal medical indications had a shorter overall time to delivery interval (21.7 hours [standard deviation, 13.0] vs 13.8 hours [standard deviation, 11.2]; P<.001 and 18.3 hours [standard deviation, 12.7] vs 14.7 hours [standard deviation, 12.4]; P<.01). CONCLUSION: Information on induction of labor can aid in the guidance and education of women undergoing the process, educate clinicians for appropriate counseling, and facilitate shared decision-making. Elsevier 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9633735/ /pubmed/36338538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100099 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research McCarthy, Claire Marie Meaney, Sarah McCarthy, Michelle Conners, Nicole Russell, Noirin Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future |
title | Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future |
title_full | Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future |
title_fullStr | Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future |
title_full_unstemmed | Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future |
title_short | Induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future |
title_sort | induction of labor: reviewing the past to improve the future |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccarthyclairemarie inductionoflaborreviewingthepasttoimprovethefuture AT meaneysarah inductionoflaborreviewingthepasttoimprovethefuture AT mccarthymichelle inductionoflaborreviewingthepasttoimprovethefuture AT connersnicole inductionoflaborreviewingthepasttoimprovethefuture AT russellnoirin inductionoflaborreviewingthepasttoimprovethefuture |