Cargando…
Opportunities and risks of self-binding directives: A qualitative study involving stakeholders and researchers in Germany
PURPOSE: Self-binding directives (SBDs) are a special type of psychiatric advance directive in which mental health service users can consent in advance to involuntary hospital admission and involuntary treatment during future mental health crises. This study presents opportunities and risks of SBDs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339872 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.974132 |
_version_ | 1784824333526368256 |
---|---|
author | Potthoff, Sarah Finke, Marleen Scholten, Matthé Gieselmann, Astrid Vollmann, Jochen Gather, Jakov |
author_facet | Potthoff, Sarah Finke, Marleen Scholten, Matthé Gieselmann, Astrid Vollmann, Jochen Gather, Jakov |
author_sort | Potthoff, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Self-binding directives (SBDs) are a special type of psychiatric advance directive in which mental health service users can consent in advance to involuntary hospital admission and involuntary treatment during future mental health crises. This study presents opportunities and risks of SBDs reported by users with bipolar disorder, family members of people with bipolar disorder, professionals working with people with bipolar disorder and researchers with expertise in mental health ethics and law. METHODS: Seventeen semi-structured interviews with users, family members and professionals, and one focus group with five researchers were conducted. The data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Six opportunities and five risks of SBDs were identified. The opportunities were promotion of autonomy and self-efficacy of users, relief of responsibility for family members, early intervention, reduction of (perceived) coercion, positive impact on the therapeutic relationship and enhancement of professionals' confidence in decision-making. The risks were problems in the assessment of mental capacity, inaccurate information or misinterpretation, increase of coercion through misuse, negative impact on the therapeutic relationship due to noncompliance with SBDs, and restricted therapeutic flexibility and less reflection on medical decision-making. Stakeholders tended to think that the opportunities of SBDs outweigh their risks, provided that appropriate control and monitoring mechanisms are in place, support is provided during the drafting process and the respective mental healthcare setting is sufficiently prepared to implement SBDs in practice. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that stakeholders consider SBDs as an opportunity to improve personalized crisis care for people with bipolar disorder indicates that a debate about the legal and clinical implementation of SBDs in Germany and beyond is necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9633858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96338582022-11-05 Opportunities and risks of self-binding directives: A qualitative study involving stakeholders and researchers in Germany Potthoff, Sarah Finke, Marleen Scholten, Matthé Gieselmann, Astrid Vollmann, Jochen Gather, Jakov Front Psychiatry Psychiatry PURPOSE: Self-binding directives (SBDs) are a special type of psychiatric advance directive in which mental health service users can consent in advance to involuntary hospital admission and involuntary treatment during future mental health crises. This study presents opportunities and risks of SBDs reported by users with bipolar disorder, family members of people with bipolar disorder, professionals working with people with bipolar disorder and researchers with expertise in mental health ethics and law. METHODS: Seventeen semi-structured interviews with users, family members and professionals, and one focus group with five researchers were conducted. The data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Six opportunities and five risks of SBDs were identified. The opportunities were promotion of autonomy and self-efficacy of users, relief of responsibility for family members, early intervention, reduction of (perceived) coercion, positive impact on the therapeutic relationship and enhancement of professionals' confidence in decision-making. The risks were problems in the assessment of mental capacity, inaccurate information or misinterpretation, increase of coercion through misuse, negative impact on the therapeutic relationship due to noncompliance with SBDs, and restricted therapeutic flexibility and less reflection on medical decision-making. Stakeholders tended to think that the opportunities of SBDs outweigh their risks, provided that appropriate control and monitoring mechanisms are in place, support is provided during the drafting process and the respective mental healthcare setting is sufficiently prepared to implement SBDs in practice. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that stakeholders consider SBDs as an opportunity to improve personalized crisis care for people with bipolar disorder indicates that a debate about the legal and clinical implementation of SBDs in Germany and beyond is necessary. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9633858/ /pubmed/36339872 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.974132 Text en Copyright © 2022 Potthoff, Finke, Scholten, Gieselmann, Vollmann and Gather. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Potthoff, Sarah Finke, Marleen Scholten, Matthé Gieselmann, Astrid Vollmann, Jochen Gather, Jakov Opportunities and risks of self-binding directives: A qualitative study involving stakeholders and researchers in Germany |
title | Opportunities and risks of self-binding directives: A qualitative study involving stakeholders and researchers in Germany |
title_full | Opportunities and risks of self-binding directives: A qualitative study involving stakeholders and researchers in Germany |
title_fullStr | Opportunities and risks of self-binding directives: A qualitative study involving stakeholders and researchers in Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | Opportunities and risks of self-binding directives: A qualitative study involving stakeholders and researchers in Germany |
title_short | Opportunities and risks of self-binding directives: A qualitative study involving stakeholders and researchers in Germany |
title_sort | opportunities and risks of self-binding directives: a qualitative study involving stakeholders and researchers in germany |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339872 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.974132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT potthoffsarah opportunitiesandrisksofselfbindingdirectivesaqualitativestudyinvolvingstakeholdersandresearchersingermany AT finkemarleen opportunitiesandrisksofselfbindingdirectivesaqualitativestudyinvolvingstakeholdersandresearchersingermany AT scholtenmatthe opportunitiesandrisksofselfbindingdirectivesaqualitativestudyinvolvingstakeholdersandresearchersingermany AT gieselmannastrid opportunitiesandrisksofselfbindingdirectivesaqualitativestudyinvolvingstakeholdersandresearchersingermany AT vollmannjochen opportunitiesandrisksofselfbindingdirectivesaqualitativestudyinvolvingstakeholdersandresearchersingermany AT gatherjakov opportunitiesandrisksofselfbindingdirectivesaqualitativestudyinvolvingstakeholdersandresearchersingermany |