Cargando…

Humanoid robot intervention vs. treatment as usual for loneliness in long-term care homes: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Loneliness affects up to 42% of long-term care residents and is associated with poor health outcomes. Humanoid robot interventions hold promise for reducing loneliness and decreasing barriers to social interaction in long-term care settings, such as the current COVID-19 safety measures i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lavin, Paola, Lesage, Myriam, Monroe, Edward, Kanevsky, Michael, Gruber, Johanna, Cinalioglu, Karin, Rej, Soham, Sekhon, Harmehr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1003881
_version_ 1784824335276441600
author Lavin, Paola
Lesage, Myriam
Monroe, Edward
Kanevsky, Michael
Gruber, Johanna
Cinalioglu, Karin
Rej, Soham
Sekhon, Harmehr
author_facet Lavin, Paola
Lesage, Myriam
Monroe, Edward
Kanevsky, Michael
Gruber, Johanna
Cinalioglu, Karin
Rej, Soham
Sekhon, Harmehr
author_sort Lavin, Paola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Loneliness affects up to 42% of long-term care residents and is associated with poor health outcomes. Humanoid robot interventions hold promise for reducing loneliness and decreasing barriers to social interaction in long-term care settings, such as the current COVID-19 safety measures in many countries, limited mobility, and poor health. We present a protocol describing an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of a humanoid robot intervention to treatment as usual, on loneliness and mental health outcomes in long-term care residents. METHODS: Seventy-four (n = 74) older adults experiencing loneliness in 3 long-term care homes will be randomized 1:1 to an 8-week, twice a week social intervention with the Grace humanoid robot vs. a treatment as usual active control. We will assess change (baseline to week 8) in (1) loneliness (primary outcome), (2) depression severity, and (3) stress (secondary outcomes), as well as (4) other exploratory outcomes: anxiety, quality of life and reduction in acute healthcare utilization. We will also assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention using qualitative methods. DISCUSSION: The proposed study will assess the effects of a social robot on loneliness and other mental health outcomes, as well as the feasibility of the intervention in older adults living in long-term care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05423899.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9633865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96338652022-11-05 Humanoid robot intervention vs. treatment as usual for loneliness in long-term care homes: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial Lavin, Paola Lesage, Myriam Monroe, Edward Kanevsky, Michael Gruber, Johanna Cinalioglu, Karin Rej, Soham Sekhon, Harmehr Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Loneliness affects up to 42% of long-term care residents and is associated with poor health outcomes. Humanoid robot interventions hold promise for reducing loneliness and decreasing barriers to social interaction in long-term care settings, such as the current COVID-19 safety measures in many countries, limited mobility, and poor health. We present a protocol describing an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of a humanoid robot intervention to treatment as usual, on loneliness and mental health outcomes in long-term care residents. METHODS: Seventy-four (n = 74) older adults experiencing loneliness in 3 long-term care homes will be randomized 1:1 to an 8-week, twice a week social intervention with the Grace humanoid robot vs. a treatment as usual active control. We will assess change (baseline to week 8) in (1) loneliness (primary outcome), (2) depression severity, and (3) stress (secondary outcomes), as well as (4) other exploratory outcomes: anxiety, quality of life and reduction in acute healthcare utilization. We will also assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention using qualitative methods. DISCUSSION: The proposed study will assess the effects of a social robot on loneliness and other mental health outcomes, as well as the feasibility of the intervention in older adults living in long-term care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05423899. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9633865/ /pubmed/36339874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1003881 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lavin, Lesage, Monroe, Kanevsky, Gruber, Cinalioglu, Rej and Sekhon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Lavin, Paola
Lesage, Myriam
Monroe, Edward
Kanevsky, Michael
Gruber, Johanna
Cinalioglu, Karin
Rej, Soham
Sekhon, Harmehr
Humanoid robot intervention vs. treatment as usual for loneliness in long-term care homes: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
title Humanoid robot intervention vs. treatment as usual for loneliness in long-term care homes: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full Humanoid robot intervention vs. treatment as usual for loneliness in long-term care homes: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Humanoid robot intervention vs. treatment as usual for loneliness in long-term care homes: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Humanoid robot intervention vs. treatment as usual for loneliness in long-term care homes: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_short Humanoid robot intervention vs. treatment as usual for loneliness in long-term care homes: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_sort humanoid robot intervention vs. treatment as usual for loneliness in long-term care homes: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1003881
work_keys_str_mv AT lavinpaola humanoidrobotinterventionvstreatmentasusualforlonelinessinlongtermcarehomesstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lesagemyriam humanoidrobotinterventionvstreatmentasusualforlonelinessinlongtermcarehomesstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT monroeedward humanoidrobotinterventionvstreatmentasusualforlonelinessinlongtermcarehomesstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kanevskymichael humanoidrobotinterventionvstreatmentasusualforlonelinessinlongtermcarehomesstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gruberjohanna humanoidrobotinterventionvstreatmentasusualforlonelinessinlongtermcarehomesstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cinalioglukarin humanoidrobotinterventionvstreatmentasusualforlonelinessinlongtermcarehomesstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rejsoham humanoidrobotinterventionvstreatmentasusualforlonelinessinlongtermcarehomesstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sekhonharmehr humanoidrobotinterventionvstreatmentasusualforlonelinessinlongtermcarehomesstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial