Cargando…
The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population
Displaced window of implantation (WOI) is one of the endometrial origins that accounts for implantation failure, especially for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), yet no standard diagnostic tool has been recognized. The study consists of two parts, aiming to compare the concordance...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1009161 |
_version_ | 1784824429038010368 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Jingjing He, Aihua Zhang, Qiong Zhao, Jing Fu, Jing Li, Hui Li, Yanping |
author_facet | Chen, Jingjing He, Aihua Zhang, Qiong Zhao, Jing Fu, Jing Li, Hui Li, Yanping |
author_sort | Chen, Jingjing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Displaced window of implantation (WOI) is one of the endometrial origins that accounts for implantation failure, especially for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), yet no standard diagnostic tool has been recognized. The study consists of two parts, aiming to compare the concordance and efficacy of the diagnostic tools, the newly developed RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) to the conventional pinopode, in diagnosing WOI and guiding personalized embryo transfer (pET). With the same group of RIF patients, the rsERT diagnosed 32 patients (65.31%) with normal WOIs, and most of the displacements were advancements (30.61%). While according to pinopode, only 14 patients (28.57%) were found with normal WOIs, and most patients (63.27%) presented delayed growth patterns. After conducting pET, patients in the rsERT group had higher successful pregnancy rates while requiring fewer ET cycles (50.00% vs. 16.67%, p=0.001). The study proved poor consistency between the diagnostic tools of endometrial receptivity based on cellular structure and gene profiling, and it supported rsERT as a reliable tool with potential clinical value. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9634259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96342592022-11-05 The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population Chen, Jingjing He, Aihua Zhang, Qiong Zhao, Jing Fu, Jing Li, Hui Li, Yanping Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Displaced window of implantation (WOI) is one of the endometrial origins that accounts for implantation failure, especially for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), yet no standard diagnostic tool has been recognized. The study consists of two parts, aiming to compare the concordance and efficacy of the diagnostic tools, the newly developed RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) to the conventional pinopode, in diagnosing WOI and guiding personalized embryo transfer (pET). With the same group of RIF patients, the rsERT diagnosed 32 patients (65.31%) with normal WOIs, and most of the displacements were advancements (30.61%). While according to pinopode, only 14 patients (28.57%) were found with normal WOIs, and most patients (63.27%) presented delayed growth patterns. After conducting pET, patients in the rsERT group had higher successful pregnancy rates while requiring fewer ET cycles (50.00% vs. 16.67%, p=0.001). The study proved poor consistency between the diagnostic tools of endometrial receptivity based on cellular structure and gene profiling, and it supported rsERT as a reliable tool with potential clinical value. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9634259/ /pubmed/36339409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1009161 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, He, Zhang, Zhao, Fu, Li and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Chen, Jingjing He, Aihua Zhang, Qiong Zhao, Jing Fu, Jing Li, Hui Li, Yanping The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population |
title | The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population |
title_full | The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population |
title_fullStr | The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population |
title_full_unstemmed | The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population |
title_short | The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population |
title_sort | rna-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsert) compared to pinopode: a better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in chinese population |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1009161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenjingjing thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT heaihua thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT zhangqiong thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT zhaojing thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT fujing thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT lihui thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT liyanping thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT chenjingjing rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT heaihua rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT zhangqiong rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT zhaojing rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT fujing rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT lihui rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation AT liyanping rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation |