Cargando…

The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population

Displaced window of implantation (WOI) is one of the endometrial origins that accounts for implantation failure, especially for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), yet no standard diagnostic tool has been recognized. The study consists of two parts, aiming to compare the concordance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jingjing, He, Aihua, Zhang, Qiong, Zhao, Jing, Fu, Jing, Li, Hui, Li, Yanping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1009161
_version_ 1784824429038010368
author Chen, Jingjing
He, Aihua
Zhang, Qiong
Zhao, Jing
Fu, Jing
Li, Hui
Li, Yanping
author_facet Chen, Jingjing
He, Aihua
Zhang, Qiong
Zhao, Jing
Fu, Jing
Li, Hui
Li, Yanping
author_sort Chen, Jingjing
collection PubMed
description Displaced window of implantation (WOI) is one of the endometrial origins that accounts for implantation failure, especially for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), yet no standard diagnostic tool has been recognized. The study consists of two parts, aiming to compare the concordance and efficacy of the diagnostic tools, the newly developed RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) to the conventional pinopode, in diagnosing WOI and guiding personalized embryo transfer (pET). With the same group of RIF patients, the rsERT diagnosed 32 patients (65.31%) with normal WOIs, and most of the displacements were advancements (30.61%). While according to pinopode, only 14 patients (28.57%) were found with normal WOIs, and most patients (63.27%) presented delayed growth patterns. After conducting pET, patients in the rsERT group had higher successful pregnancy rates while requiring fewer ET cycles (50.00% vs. 16.67%, p=0.001). The study proved poor consistency between the diagnostic tools of endometrial receptivity based on cellular structure and gene profiling, and it supported rsERT as a reliable tool with potential clinical value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9634259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96342592022-11-05 The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population Chen, Jingjing He, Aihua Zhang, Qiong Zhao, Jing Fu, Jing Li, Hui Li, Yanping Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Displaced window of implantation (WOI) is one of the endometrial origins that accounts for implantation failure, especially for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), yet no standard diagnostic tool has been recognized. The study consists of two parts, aiming to compare the concordance and efficacy of the diagnostic tools, the newly developed RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) to the conventional pinopode, in diagnosing WOI and guiding personalized embryo transfer (pET). With the same group of RIF patients, the rsERT diagnosed 32 patients (65.31%) with normal WOIs, and most of the displacements were advancements (30.61%). While according to pinopode, only 14 patients (28.57%) were found with normal WOIs, and most patients (63.27%) presented delayed growth patterns. After conducting pET, patients in the rsERT group had higher successful pregnancy rates while requiring fewer ET cycles (50.00% vs. 16.67%, p=0.001). The study proved poor consistency between the diagnostic tools of endometrial receptivity based on cellular structure and gene profiling, and it supported rsERT as a reliable tool with potential clinical value. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9634259/ /pubmed/36339409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1009161 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, He, Zhang, Zhao, Fu, Li and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Chen, Jingjing
He, Aihua
Zhang, Qiong
Zhao, Jing
Fu, Jing
Li, Hui
Li, Yanping
The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population
title The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population
title_full The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population
title_fullStr The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population
title_full_unstemmed The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population
title_short The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population
title_sort rna-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsert) compared to pinopode: a better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in chinese population
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1009161
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjingjing thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT heaihua thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT zhangqiong thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT zhaojing thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT fujing thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT lihui thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT liyanping thernaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT chenjingjing rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT heaihua rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT zhangqiong rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT zhaojing rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT fujing rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT lihui rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation
AT liyanping rnaseqbasedendometrialreceptivitytestrsertcomparedtopinopodeabetterdiagnostictoolforendometrialreceptivityforpatientswithrecurrentimplantationfailureinchinesepopulation