Cargando…

Tracheostomy Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating in Trauma Patients: Is It Safe?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and necessity of tracheostomy after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plating, despite the close proximity of the two surgical skin incisions. METHODS: Sixty-three patients with traumatic cervical fractures or spinal cord injury (S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, ChangYub, Kim, Pius, Ju, Chang Il, Kim, Seok Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neurotraumatology Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36381461
http://dx.doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2022.18.e34
_version_ 1784824462455078912
author Kim, ChangYub
Kim, Pius
Ju, Chang Il
Kim, Seok Won
author_facet Kim, ChangYub
Kim, Pius
Ju, Chang Il
Kim, Seok Won
author_sort Kim, ChangYub
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and necessity of tracheostomy after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plating, despite the close proximity of the two surgical skin incisions. METHODS: Sixty-three patients with traumatic cervical fractures or spinal cord injury (SCI) who underwent single-level ACDF and plating between January 2014 and June 2019 were included in this study. The patients included 45 men and 18 women, with a mean age of 48.5 years. A retrospective analysis of the patients’ demographic data, level of injury, radiological findings, and neurological status was performed based on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), open tracheostomy, and decannulation rate. Additionally, risk factors necessitating tracheostomy were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (28.5%) required subsequent open tracheostomy. Among them, 11 patients were successfully decannulated, four patients could not be decannulated during the follow-up period, and three patients died of unrelated complications. The median interval from ACDF with plating to open tracheostomy was 9.6 days (range, 5–23 days). On the basis of neurological status, ASIA A and B patients (p<0.001), high signal intensity on T2-weighted-magnetic resonance (MR) images (p=0.001), and major cervical fracture and dislocation were significant risk factors for tracheostomy (p=0.02). No patient showed evidence of significant soft tissue, bony infection, or nonunion during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Independent tracheostomy did not increase the risk of infection or nonunion despite the close proximity of the two surgical skin incisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9634326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Neurotraumatology Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96343262022-11-14 Tracheostomy Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating in Trauma Patients: Is It Safe? Kim, ChangYub Kim, Pius Ju, Chang Il Kim, Seok Won Korean J Neurotrauma Current Issue OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and necessity of tracheostomy after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plating, despite the close proximity of the two surgical skin incisions. METHODS: Sixty-three patients with traumatic cervical fractures or spinal cord injury (SCI) who underwent single-level ACDF and plating between January 2014 and June 2019 were included in this study. The patients included 45 men and 18 women, with a mean age of 48.5 years. A retrospective analysis of the patients’ demographic data, level of injury, radiological findings, and neurological status was performed based on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), open tracheostomy, and decannulation rate. Additionally, risk factors necessitating tracheostomy were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (28.5%) required subsequent open tracheostomy. Among them, 11 patients were successfully decannulated, four patients could not be decannulated during the follow-up period, and three patients died of unrelated complications. The median interval from ACDF with plating to open tracheostomy was 9.6 days (range, 5–23 days). On the basis of neurological status, ASIA A and B patients (p<0.001), high signal intensity on T2-weighted-magnetic resonance (MR) images (p=0.001), and major cervical fracture and dislocation were significant risk factors for tracheostomy (p=0.02). No patient showed evidence of significant soft tissue, bony infection, or nonunion during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Independent tracheostomy did not increase the risk of infection or nonunion despite the close proximity of the two surgical skin incisions. Korean Neurotraumatology Society 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9634326/ /pubmed/36381461 http://dx.doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2022.18.e34 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Neurotraumatology Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Current Issue
Kim, ChangYub
Kim, Pius
Ju, Chang Il
Kim, Seok Won
Tracheostomy Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating in Trauma Patients: Is It Safe?
title Tracheostomy Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating in Trauma Patients: Is It Safe?
title_full Tracheostomy Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating in Trauma Patients: Is It Safe?
title_fullStr Tracheostomy Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating in Trauma Patients: Is It Safe?
title_full_unstemmed Tracheostomy Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating in Trauma Patients: Is It Safe?
title_short Tracheostomy Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating in Trauma Patients: Is It Safe?
title_sort tracheostomy following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating in trauma patients: is it safe?
topic Current Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36381461
http://dx.doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2022.18.e34
work_keys_str_mv AT kimchangyub tracheostomyfollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithplatingintraumapatientsisitsafe
AT kimpius tracheostomyfollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithplatingintraumapatientsisitsafe
AT juchangil tracheostomyfollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithplatingintraumapatientsisitsafe
AT kimseokwon tracheostomyfollowinganteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithplatingintraumapatientsisitsafe