Cargando…

Masquelet Technique and Proximal Tibial Autograft Utilizing Avitus® Bone Harvester for Severely Comminuted Open Distal Radius Fracture with Extensive Bone Loss: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION: Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in the United States. Treatment usually involves internal fixation using a volar Henry approach with placement of a volar locking plate. Optimal treatment becomes less apparent when significant bone loss occurs. No case of an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greco, Victor E, Hammarstedt, Jon E., O’Connor, Shaelyn, Regal, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Indian Orthopaedic Research Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36381007
http://dx.doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i04.2762
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in the United States. Treatment usually involves internal fixation using a volar Henry approach with placement of a volar locking plate. Optimal treatment becomes less apparent when significant bone loss occurs. No case of an open distal radius fracture treated using a staged Masquelet technique involving proximal tibial autograft is available in the literature. Herein, we describe and discuss a case report of a novel technique to treat a large (5 cm) bone defect for an open distal radius fracture CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old man suffered an open, comminuted, and intra-articular distal radius fracture with 5 cm of bone loss. He was treated using a staged Masquelet technique with incorporation of ipsilateral proximal tibial autograft with a bone harvester to obtain cancellous autograft and bone marrow graft. The patient initially underwent emergent I and D, acute carpal tunnel release, and internal and external fixation. A 5 cm bone void was filled with antibiotic cement. Four weeks later, the antibiotic cement was removed, cancellous bone graft and marrow were harvested from the proximal tibia, and the graft was placed within the prior bone void. Fracture site healing was confirmed radiographically and with computer-tomography imaging 3 months later. The patient has demonstrated excellent results 1 year post-operative with 60° of wrist flexion, 40° of wrist extension with mild pain, and full finger range of motion with radiographic union. CONCLUSION: Internal fixation with placement of a volar locking plate remains the mainstay of treatment for distal radial fractures. However, in more comminuted fractures with bone loss, treatment becomes more challenging. We have presented a unique case utilizing a staged Masquelet technique with incorporation of a proximal tibial autograft to educate readers on an alternative option and technique for autograft donor sites in these more complicated fractures.