Cargando…
The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized despite evidence that screening improves survival. Since healthcare provider recommendation is a strong predictor of CRC screening completion, providers are encouraged to engage eligible patients in collaborative decision-making that att...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2022.106852 |
_version_ | 1784824534654779392 |
---|---|
author | Griffin, Joan M. Rutten, Lila J. Finney Zhu, Xuan Feng, Ziding Rogers, Charles R. Marsh, Tracey L. Inadomi, John M. |
author_facet | Griffin, Joan M. Rutten, Lila J. Finney Zhu, Xuan Feng, Ziding Rogers, Charles R. Marsh, Tracey L. Inadomi, John M. |
author_sort | Griffin, Joan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized despite evidence that screening improves survival. Since healthcare provider recommendation is a strong predictor of CRC screening completion, providers are encouraged to engage eligible patients in collaborative decision-making that attends to patients’ values, needs, and preferences for guideline-concordant screening modalities. METHODS: This three-arm randomized controlled trial is testing the effectiveness of an evidence-based video intervention informing patients of screening choices delivered in a clinic prior to a healthcare appointment. We hypothesize that participants randomized to watch a basic video describing CRC and screening in addition to an informed choice video showing the advantages and disadvantages of fecal immunochemical test (FIT), stool DNA FIT (s-DNA FIT), and colonoscopy (Arm 3) will exhibit a greater proportion of time adherent to CRC screening guidelines after 1, 3 and 6 years than those who only watch the basic video (Arm 2) or no video at all (Arm 1). Primary care and Obstetrician/Gynecology clinics across the United States are recruiting 5280 patients, half who have never been screened and half who previously screened but are currently not guideline adherent. Participants complete surveys prior to and following an index appointment to self-report personal, cognitive, and environmental factors potentially associated with screening. Proportion of time adherent to screening guidelines will be assessed using medical record data and supplemented with annual surveys self-reporting screening. CONCLUSION: Results will provide evidence on the effectiveness of informational and motivational videos to encourage CRC screening that can be easily integrated into clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9634616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96346162022-11-04 The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion Griffin, Joan M. Rutten, Lila J. Finney Zhu, Xuan Feng, Ziding Rogers, Charles R. Marsh, Tracey L. Inadomi, John M. Contemp Clin Trials Article BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized despite evidence that screening improves survival. Since healthcare provider recommendation is a strong predictor of CRC screening completion, providers are encouraged to engage eligible patients in collaborative decision-making that attends to patients’ values, needs, and preferences for guideline-concordant screening modalities. METHODS: This three-arm randomized controlled trial is testing the effectiveness of an evidence-based video intervention informing patients of screening choices delivered in a clinic prior to a healthcare appointment. We hypothesize that participants randomized to watch a basic video describing CRC and screening in addition to an informed choice video showing the advantages and disadvantages of fecal immunochemical test (FIT), stool DNA FIT (s-DNA FIT), and colonoscopy (Arm 3) will exhibit a greater proportion of time adherent to CRC screening guidelines after 1, 3 and 6 years than those who only watch the basic video (Arm 2) or no video at all (Arm 1). Primary care and Obstetrician/Gynecology clinics across the United States are recruiting 5280 patients, half who have never been screened and half who previously screened but are currently not guideline adherent. Participants complete surveys prior to and following an index appointment to self-report personal, cognitive, and environmental factors potentially associated with screening. Proportion of time adherent to screening guidelines will be assessed using medical record data and supplemented with annual surveys self-reporting screening. CONCLUSION: Results will provide evidence on the effectiveness of informational and motivational videos to encourage CRC screening that can be easily integrated into clinical practice. 2022-08 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9634616/ /pubmed/35842109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2022.106852 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Griffin, Joan M. Rutten, Lila J. Finney Zhu, Xuan Feng, Ziding Rogers, Charles R. Marsh, Tracey L. Inadomi, John M. The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion |
title | The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion |
title_full | The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion |
title_fullStr | The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion |
title_full_unstemmed | The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion |
title_short | The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion |
title_sort | compass study: a prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2022.106852 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT griffinjoanm thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT ruttenlilajfinney thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT zhuxuan thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT fengziding thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT rogerscharlesr thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT marshtraceyl thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT inadomijohnm thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT griffinjoanm compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT ruttenlilajfinney compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT zhuxuan compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT fengziding compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT rogerscharlesr compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT marshtraceyl compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion AT inadomijohnm compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion |