Cargando…

The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized despite evidence that screening improves survival. Since healthcare provider recommendation is a strong predictor of CRC screening completion, providers are encouraged to engage eligible patients in collaborative decision-making that att...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffin, Joan M., Rutten, Lila J. Finney, Zhu, Xuan, Feng, Ziding, Rogers, Charles R., Marsh, Tracey L., Inadomi, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2022.106852
_version_ 1784824534654779392
author Griffin, Joan M.
Rutten, Lila J. Finney
Zhu, Xuan
Feng, Ziding
Rogers, Charles R.
Marsh, Tracey L.
Inadomi, John M.
author_facet Griffin, Joan M.
Rutten, Lila J. Finney
Zhu, Xuan
Feng, Ziding
Rogers, Charles R.
Marsh, Tracey L.
Inadomi, John M.
author_sort Griffin, Joan M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized despite evidence that screening improves survival. Since healthcare provider recommendation is a strong predictor of CRC screening completion, providers are encouraged to engage eligible patients in collaborative decision-making that attends to patients’ values, needs, and preferences for guideline-concordant screening modalities. METHODS: This three-arm randomized controlled trial is testing the effectiveness of an evidence-based video intervention informing patients of screening choices delivered in a clinic prior to a healthcare appointment. We hypothesize that participants randomized to watch a basic video describing CRC and screening in addition to an informed choice video showing the advantages and disadvantages of fecal immunochemical test (FIT), stool DNA FIT (s-DNA FIT), and colonoscopy (Arm 3) will exhibit a greater proportion of time adherent to CRC screening guidelines after 1, 3 and 6 years than those who only watch the basic video (Arm 2) or no video at all (Arm 1). Primary care and Obstetrician/Gynecology clinics across the United States are recruiting 5280 patients, half who have never been screened and half who previously screened but are currently not guideline adherent. Participants complete surveys prior to and following an index appointment to self-report personal, cognitive, and environmental factors potentially associated with screening. Proportion of time adherent to screening guidelines will be assessed using medical record data and supplemented with annual surveys self-reporting screening. CONCLUSION: Results will provide evidence on the effectiveness of informational and motivational videos to encourage CRC screening that can be easily integrated into clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9634616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96346162022-11-04 The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion Griffin, Joan M. Rutten, Lila J. Finney Zhu, Xuan Feng, Ziding Rogers, Charles R. Marsh, Tracey L. Inadomi, John M. Contemp Clin Trials Article BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized despite evidence that screening improves survival. Since healthcare provider recommendation is a strong predictor of CRC screening completion, providers are encouraged to engage eligible patients in collaborative decision-making that attends to patients’ values, needs, and preferences for guideline-concordant screening modalities. METHODS: This three-arm randomized controlled trial is testing the effectiveness of an evidence-based video intervention informing patients of screening choices delivered in a clinic prior to a healthcare appointment. We hypothesize that participants randomized to watch a basic video describing CRC and screening in addition to an informed choice video showing the advantages and disadvantages of fecal immunochemical test (FIT), stool DNA FIT (s-DNA FIT), and colonoscopy (Arm 3) will exhibit a greater proportion of time adherent to CRC screening guidelines after 1, 3 and 6 years than those who only watch the basic video (Arm 2) or no video at all (Arm 1). Primary care and Obstetrician/Gynecology clinics across the United States are recruiting 5280 patients, half who have never been screened and half who previously screened but are currently not guideline adherent. Participants complete surveys prior to and following an index appointment to self-report personal, cognitive, and environmental factors potentially associated with screening. Proportion of time adherent to screening guidelines will be assessed using medical record data and supplemented with annual surveys self-reporting screening. CONCLUSION: Results will provide evidence on the effectiveness of informational and motivational videos to encourage CRC screening that can be easily integrated into clinical practice. 2022-08 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9634616/ /pubmed/35842109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2022.106852 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Griffin, Joan M.
Rutten, Lila J. Finney
Zhu, Xuan
Feng, Ziding
Rogers, Charles R.
Marsh, Tracey L.
Inadomi, John M.
The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion
title The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion
title_full The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion
title_fullStr The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion
title_full_unstemmed The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion
title_short The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion
title_sort compass study: a prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35842109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2022.106852
work_keys_str_mv AT griffinjoanm thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT ruttenlilajfinney thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT zhuxuan thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT fengziding thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT rogerscharlesr thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT marshtraceyl thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT inadomijohnm thecompassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT griffinjoanm compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT ruttenlilajfinney compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT zhuxuan compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT fengziding compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT rogerscharlesr compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT marshtraceyl compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion
AT inadomijohnm compassstudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentertrialtestingtheimpactofaclinicbasedinterventioninformingpatientsofcolorectalcancerscreeningoptionsonscreeningcompletion