Cargando…
Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Test in Myeloid Neoplasms and Evaluation with the Clinical Results
Objective: Myeloid malignancies are heterogeneous disorders due to defective hematopoiesis and myeloid differentiation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell. The molecular landscape of the diseases is complex. Molecular alterations are used for classification and evaluation of prognosis and treatmen...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Atatürk University School of Medicine
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35703527 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21102 |
_version_ | 1784824596149567488 |
---|---|
author | Yuce Kahraman, Cigdem Sincan, Gulden Tatar, Abdulgani |
author_facet | Yuce Kahraman, Cigdem Sincan, Gulden Tatar, Abdulgani |
author_sort | Yuce Kahraman, Cigdem |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Myeloid malignancies are heterogeneous disorders due to defective hematopoiesis and myeloid differentiation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell. The molecular landscape of the diseases is complex. Molecular alterations are used for classification and evaluation of prognosis and treatment. We aimed to evaluate the advantages of the next-generation sequencing panel testing in myeloid malignancies and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the results of 54 patients who underwent next-generation sequencing myeloid panel testing, with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), polymerase chain reaction results and the clinical outcomes. Target genes in the panel were ASXL1, CALR, CBL, CEBPA, CSF3R, DNMT3A, EZH2, FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, KIT, KRAS, MPL, NPM1, NRAS, RUNX1, SETBP1, SF3B1, SH2B3, SRSF2, TET2, TP53, U2AF1, and ZRSR2. Results: Diagnoses were acute myeloid leukemia, essential thrombocytosis, polistemia vera, primary myelofibrosis, hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), chronic myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Twenty-eight missense, 8 frameshift, 5 stop gain, and 3 in-frame mutations were detected. A double mutation was detected in JAK-2 with next-generation sequencing in the patient who was given a false negative result due to polymerase chain reaction limitation. Conclusion: Screening multiple mutations simultaneously, is time and cost-effective. With the panel test, it is possible to determine the diagnosis, prognosis and targeted treatment options with a single test. Next-generation sequencing myeloid panel tests might be a powerful guide for clinicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9634881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Atatürk University School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96348812022-11-04 Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Test in Myeloid Neoplasms and Evaluation with the Clinical Results Yuce Kahraman, Cigdem Sincan, Gulden Tatar, Abdulgani Eurasian J Med Original Article Hematology Objective: Myeloid malignancies are heterogeneous disorders due to defective hematopoiesis and myeloid differentiation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell. The molecular landscape of the diseases is complex. Molecular alterations are used for classification and evaluation of prognosis and treatment. We aimed to evaluate the advantages of the next-generation sequencing panel testing in myeloid malignancies and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the results of 54 patients who underwent next-generation sequencing myeloid panel testing, with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), polymerase chain reaction results and the clinical outcomes. Target genes in the panel were ASXL1, CALR, CBL, CEBPA, CSF3R, DNMT3A, EZH2, FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, KIT, KRAS, MPL, NPM1, NRAS, RUNX1, SETBP1, SF3B1, SH2B3, SRSF2, TET2, TP53, U2AF1, and ZRSR2. Results: Diagnoses were acute myeloid leukemia, essential thrombocytosis, polistemia vera, primary myelofibrosis, hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), chronic myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Twenty-eight missense, 8 frameshift, 5 stop gain, and 3 in-frame mutations were detected. A double mutation was detected in JAK-2 with next-generation sequencing in the patient who was given a false negative result due to polymerase chain reaction limitation. Conclusion: Screening multiple mutations simultaneously, is time and cost-effective. With the panel test, it is possible to determine the diagnosis, prognosis and targeted treatment options with a single test. Next-generation sequencing myeloid panel tests might be a powerful guide for clinicians. Atatürk University School of Medicine 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9634881/ /pubmed/35703527 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21102 Text en © Copyright 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hematology Yuce Kahraman, Cigdem Sincan, Gulden Tatar, Abdulgani Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Test in Myeloid Neoplasms and Evaluation with the Clinical Results |
title | Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Test in Myeloid Neoplasms and Evaluation with the Clinical Results |
title_full | Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Test in Myeloid Neoplasms and Evaluation with the Clinical Results |
title_fullStr | Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Test in Myeloid Neoplasms and Evaluation with the Clinical Results |
title_full_unstemmed | Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Test in Myeloid Neoplasms and Evaluation with the Clinical Results |
title_short | Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Test in Myeloid Neoplasms and Evaluation with the Clinical Results |
title_sort | next-generation sequencing panel test in myeloid neoplasms and evaluation with the clinical results |
topic | Original Article Hematology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35703527 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yucekahramancigdem nextgenerationsequencingpaneltestinmyeloidneoplasmsandevaluationwiththeclinicalresults AT sincangulden nextgenerationsequencingpaneltestinmyeloidneoplasmsandevaluationwiththeclinicalresults AT tatarabdulgani nextgenerationsequencingpaneltestinmyeloidneoplasmsandevaluationwiththeclinicalresults |