Cargando…

In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices

Additive manufacturing (3D printing) enables the fabrication of highly customized and complex devices and is therefore increasingly used in the field of life sciences and biotechnology. However, the application of 3D‐printed parts in these fields requires not only their biocompatibility but also the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winkler, Steffen, Meyer, Katharina V., Heuer, Christopher, Kortmann, Carlotta, Dehne, Michaela, Bahnemann, Janina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202100104
_version_ 1784824616010645504
author Winkler, Steffen
Meyer, Katharina V.
Heuer, Christopher
Kortmann, Carlotta
Dehne, Michaela
Bahnemann, Janina
author_facet Winkler, Steffen
Meyer, Katharina V.
Heuer, Christopher
Kortmann, Carlotta
Dehne, Michaela
Bahnemann, Janina
author_sort Winkler, Steffen
collection PubMed
description Additive manufacturing (3D printing) enables the fabrication of highly customized and complex devices and is therefore increasingly used in the field of life sciences and biotechnology. However, the application of 3D‐printed parts in these fields requires not only their biocompatibility but also their sterility. The most common method for sterilizing 3D‐printed parts is heat steam sterilization—but most commercially available 3D printing materials cannot withstand high temperatures. In this study, a novel heat‐resistant polyacrylate material for high‐resolution 3D Multijet printing was evaluated for the first time for its resistance to heat steam sterilization and in vitro biocompatibility with mouse fibroblasts (L929), human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293E), and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae)). Analysis of the growth and viability of L929 cells and the growth of S. cerevisiae confirmed that the extraction media obtained from 3D‐printed parts had no negative effect on the aforementioned cell types, while, in contrast, viability and growth of HEK 293E cells were affected. No different effects of the material on the cells were found when comparing heat steam sterilization and disinfection with ethanol (70%, v/v). In principle, the investigated material shows great potential for high‐resolution 3D printing of novel cell culture systems that are highly complex in design, customized and easily sterilizable—however, the biocompatibility of the material for other cell types needs to be re‐evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9635007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96350072022-11-07 In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices Winkler, Steffen Meyer, Katharina V. Heuer, Christopher Kortmann, Carlotta Dehne, Michaela Bahnemann, Janina Eng Life Sci Research Article Additive manufacturing (3D printing) enables the fabrication of highly customized and complex devices and is therefore increasingly used in the field of life sciences and biotechnology. However, the application of 3D‐printed parts in these fields requires not only their biocompatibility but also their sterility. The most common method for sterilizing 3D‐printed parts is heat steam sterilization—but most commercially available 3D printing materials cannot withstand high temperatures. In this study, a novel heat‐resistant polyacrylate material for high‐resolution 3D Multijet printing was evaluated for the first time for its resistance to heat steam sterilization and in vitro biocompatibility with mouse fibroblasts (L929), human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293E), and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae)). Analysis of the growth and viability of L929 cells and the growth of S. cerevisiae confirmed that the extraction media obtained from 3D‐printed parts had no negative effect on the aforementioned cell types, while, in contrast, viability and growth of HEK 293E cells were affected. No different effects of the material on the cells were found when comparing heat steam sterilization and disinfection with ethanol (70%, v/v). In principle, the investigated material shows great potential for high‐resolution 3D printing of novel cell culture systems that are highly complex in design, customized and easily sterilizable—however, the biocompatibility of the material for other cell types needs to be re‐evaluated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9635007/ /pubmed/36348657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202100104 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Engineering in Life Sciences published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Winkler, Steffen
Meyer, Katharina V.
Heuer, Christopher
Kortmann, Carlotta
Dehne, Michaela
Bahnemann, Janina
In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices
title In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices
title_full In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices
title_fullStr In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices
title_full_unstemmed In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices
title_short In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices
title_sort in vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3d printing material for use in customized cell culture devices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202100104
work_keys_str_mv AT winklersteffen invitrobiocompatibilityevaluationofaheatresistant3dprintingmaterialforuseincustomizedcellculturedevices
AT meyerkatharinav invitrobiocompatibilityevaluationofaheatresistant3dprintingmaterialforuseincustomizedcellculturedevices
AT heuerchristopher invitrobiocompatibilityevaluationofaheatresistant3dprintingmaterialforuseincustomizedcellculturedevices
AT kortmanncarlotta invitrobiocompatibilityevaluationofaheatresistant3dprintingmaterialforuseincustomizedcellculturedevices
AT dehnemichaela invitrobiocompatibilityevaluationofaheatresistant3dprintingmaterialforuseincustomizedcellculturedevices
AT bahnemannjanina invitrobiocompatibilityevaluationofaheatresistant3dprintingmaterialforuseincustomizedcellculturedevices