Cargando…
In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices
Additive manufacturing (3D printing) enables the fabrication of highly customized and complex devices and is therefore increasingly used in the field of life sciences and biotechnology. However, the application of 3D‐printed parts in these fields requires not only their biocompatibility but also the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202100104 |
_version_ | 1784824616010645504 |
---|---|
author | Winkler, Steffen Meyer, Katharina V. Heuer, Christopher Kortmann, Carlotta Dehne, Michaela Bahnemann, Janina |
author_facet | Winkler, Steffen Meyer, Katharina V. Heuer, Christopher Kortmann, Carlotta Dehne, Michaela Bahnemann, Janina |
author_sort | Winkler, Steffen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Additive manufacturing (3D printing) enables the fabrication of highly customized and complex devices and is therefore increasingly used in the field of life sciences and biotechnology. However, the application of 3D‐printed parts in these fields requires not only their biocompatibility but also their sterility. The most common method for sterilizing 3D‐printed parts is heat steam sterilization—but most commercially available 3D printing materials cannot withstand high temperatures. In this study, a novel heat‐resistant polyacrylate material for high‐resolution 3D Multijet printing was evaluated for the first time for its resistance to heat steam sterilization and in vitro biocompatibility with mouse fibroblasts (L929), human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293E), and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae)). Analysis of the growth and viability of L929 cells and the growth of S. cerevisiae confirmed that the extraction media obtained from 3D‐printed parts had no negative effect on the aforementioned cell types, while, in contrast, viability and growth of HEK 293E cells were affected. No different effects of the material on the cells were found when comparing heat steam sterilization and disinfection with ethanol (70%, v/v). In principle, the investigated material shows great potential for high‐resolution 3D printing of novel cell culture systems that are highly complex in design, customized and easily sterilizable—however, the biocompatibility of the material for other cell types needs to be re‐evaluated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9635007 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96350072022-11-07 In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices Winkler, Steffen Meyer, Katharina V. Heuer, Christopher Kortmann, Carlotta Dehne, Michaela Bahnemann, Janina Eng Life Sci Research Article Additive manufacturing (3D printing) enables the fabrication of highly customized and complex devices and is therefore increasingly used in the field of life sciences and biotechnology. However, the application of 3D‐printed parts in these fields requires not only their biocompatibility but also their sterility. The most common method for sterilizing 3D‐printed parts is heat steam sterilization—but most commercially available 3D printing materials cannot withstand high temperatures. In this study, a novel heat‐resistant polyacrylate material for high‐resolution 3D Multijet printing was evaluated for the first time for its resistance to heat steam sterilization and in vitro biocompatibility with mouse fibroblasts (L929), human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293E), and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae)). Analysis of the growth and viability of L929 cells and the growth of S. cerevisiae confirmed that the extraction media obtained from 3D‐printed parts had no negative effect on the aforementioned cell types, while, in contrast, viability and growth of HEK 293E cells were affected. No different effects of the material on the cells were found when comparing heat steam sterilization and disinfection with ethanol (70%, v/v). In principle, the investigated material shows great potential for high‐resolution 3D printing of novel cell culture systems that are highly complex in design, customized and easily sterilizable—however, the biocompatibility of the material for other cell types needs to be re‐evaluated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9635007/ /pubmed/36348657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202100104 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Engineering in Life Sciences published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Winkler, Steffen Meyer, Katharina V. Heuer, Christopher Kortmann, Carlotta Dehne, Michaela Bahnemann, Janina In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices |
title |
In
vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices |
title_full |
In
vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices |
title_fullStr |
In
vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices |
title_full_unstemmed |
In
vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices |
title_short |
In
vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices |
title_sort | in
vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat‐resistant 3d printing material for use in customized cell culture devices |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202100104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT winklersteffen invitrobiocompatibilityevaluationofaheatresistant3dprintingmaterialforuseincustomizedcellculturedevices AT meyerkatharinav invitrobiocompatibilityevaluationofaheatresistant3dprintingmaterialforuseincustomizedcellculturedevices AT heuerchristopher invitrobiocompatibilityevaluationofaheatresistant3dprintingmaterialforuseincustomizedcellculturedevices AT kortmanncarlotta invitrobiocompatibilityevaluationofaheatresistant3dprintingmaterialforuseincustomizedcellculturedevices AT dehnemichaela invitrobiocompatibilityevaluationofaheatresistant3dprintingmaterialforuseincustomizedcellculturedevices AT bahnemannjanina invitrobiocompatibilityevaluationofaheatresistant3dprintingmaterialforuseincustomizedcellculturedevices |