Cargando…

Left atrial reservoir strain improves diagnostic accuracy of the 2016 ASE/EACVI diastolic algorithm in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: insights from the KARUM haemodynamic database( )

AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the incremental value offered by left atrial reservoir strain (LAS(r)) to the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) diastolic algorithm to identify elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venkateshvaran, Ashwin, Tureli, Hande Oktay, Faxén, Ulrika Ljung, Lund, Lars H, Tossavainen, Erik, Lindqvist, Per
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35182152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeac036
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the incremental value offered by left atrial reservoir strain (LAS(r)) to the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) diastolic algorithm to identify elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Near-simultaneous echocardiography and right heart catheterization were performed in 210 patients with EF ≥50% in a large, dual-centre study. Elevated filling pressure was defined as invasive pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥15 mmHg. LAS(r) was evaluated using speckle-tracking echocardiography. Diagnostic performance of the ASE/EACVI diastolic algorithm was validated against invasive reference and compared with modified algorithms incorporating LAS(r). Modest correlation was observed between E/e′, E/A ratio, and LA volume index with PCWP (r = 0.46, 0.46, and 0.36, respectively; P < 0.001 for all). Mitral e′ and TR peak velocity showed no association. The ASE/EACVI algorithm (89% feasibility, 71% sensitivity, 68% specificity) demonstrated reasonable ability (AUC = 0.69) and 68% accuracy to identify elevated LV filling pressure. LAS(r) displayed strong ability to identify elevated PCWP (AUC = 0.76). Substituting TR peak velocity for LAS(r) in the algorithm (69% sensitivity, 84% specificity) resulted in 91% feasibility, 81% accuracy, and stronger agreement with invasive measurements. Employing LAS(r) as per expert consensus (71% sensitivity, 70% specificity) and adding LAS(r) to conventional parameters (67% sensitivity, 84% specificity) also demonstrated greater feasibility (98% and 90%, respectively) and overall accuracy (70% and 80%, respectively) to estimate elevated PCWP. CONCLUSIONS: LAS(r) improves feasibility and overall accuracy of the ASE/EACVI algorithm to discern elevated filling pressures in patients with preserved EF.