Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data

PURPOSE: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an acute and critical disease among children and adults, and previous studies have shown that the administration of corticosteroids remains controversial. Therefore, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Xinyan, Li, Shaojun, Fu, Yueqiang, Dang, Hongxing, Liu, Chengjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02186-4
_version_ 1784824636682272768
author Chang, Xinyan
Li, Shaojun
Fu, Yueqiang
Dang, Hongxing
Liu, Chengjun
author_facet Chang, Xinyan
Li, Shaojun
Fu, Yueqiang
Dang, Hongxing
Liu, Chengjun
author_sort Chang, Xinyan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an acute and critical disease among children and adults, and previous studies have shown that the administration of corticosteroids remains controversial. Therefore, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of corticosteroids. METHODS: The RCTs investigating the safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS were searched from electronic databases (Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi square test and I(2) with the inspection level of 0.1 and 50%, respectively. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs (n = 1607) were included for analysis. Corticosteroids were found to reduce the risk of death in patients with ARDS (relative risk (RR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70–0.87; P < 0.01). Moreover, no significant adverse events were observed, compared to placebo or standard support therapy. Further subgroup analysis showed that variables, such as adults (RR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.70–0.88; P < 0.01), non-COVID-19 (RR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.62–0.83; P < 0.01), methylprednisolone (RR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56–0.88; P < 0.01), and hydrocortisone (RR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.63–0.98; P = 0.03) were associated with 28-day mortality among patients who used corticosteroids. However, no association was found, regarding children (RR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.01–4.10; P = 0.30). CONCLUSION: The use of corticosteroids is an effective approach to reduce the risk of death in ARDS patients. However, this effect is associated with age, non-COVID-19 diseases, and methylprednisolone and hydrocortisone use. Therefore, evidence suggests patients with age ≥ 18 years and non-COVID-19 should be encouraged during the corticosteroid treatment. However, due to substantial differences in the use of corticosteroids among these studies, questions still remain regarding the dosage, optimal corticosteroid agent, and treatment duration in patients with ARDS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02186-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9635104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96351042022-11-05 Safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data Chang, Xinyan Li, Shaojun Fu, Yueqiang Dang, Hongxing Liu, Chengjun Respir Res Review PURPOSE: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an acute and critical disease among children and adults, and previous studies have shown that the administration of corticosteroids remains controversial. Therefore, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of corticosteroids. METHODS: The RCTs investigating the safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS were searched from electronic databases (Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi square test and I(2) with the inspection level of 0.1 and 50%, respectively. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs (n = 1607) were included for analysis. Corticosteroids were found to reduce the risk of death in patients with ARDS (relative risk (RR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70–0.87; P < 0.01). Moreover, no significant adverse events were observed, compared to placebo or standard support therapy. Further subgroup analysis showed that variables, such as adults (RR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.70–0.88; P < 0.01), non-COVID-19 (RR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.62–0.83; P < 0.01), methylprednisolone (RR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56–0.88; P < 0.01), and hydrocortisone (RR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.63–0.98; P = 0.03) were associated with 28-day mortality among patients who used corticosteroids. However, no association was found, regarding children (RR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.01–4.10; P = 0.30). CONCLUSION: The use of corticosteroids is an effective approach to reduce the risk of death in ARDS patients. However, this effect is associated with age, non-COVID-19 diseases, and methylprednisolone and hydrocortisone use. Therefore, evidence suggests patients with age ≥ 18 years and non-COVID-19 should be encouraged during the corticosteroid treatment. However, due to substantial differences in the use of corticosteroids among these studies, questions still remain regarding the dosage, optimal corticosteroid agent, and treatment duration in patients with ARDS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02186-4. BioMed Central 2022-11-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9635104/ /pubmed/36333729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02186-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Chang, Xinyan
Li, Shaojun
Fu, Yueqiang
Dang, Hongxing
Liu, Chengjun
Safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data
title Safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data
title_full Safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data
title_short Safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data
title_sort safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in ards patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rct data
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02186-4
work_keys_str_mv AT changxinyan safetyandefficacyofcorticosteroidsinardspatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrctdata
AT lishaojun safetyandefficacyofcorticosteroidsinardspatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrctdata
AT fuyueqiang safetyandefficacyofcorticosteroidsinardspatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrctdata
AT danghongxing safetyandefficacyofcorticosteroidsinardspatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrctdata
AT liuchengjun safetyandefficacyofcorticosteroidsinardspatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrctdata