Infection and the evaluation of biomarkers in obstetrics and gynecology patients with infectious disease: a retrospective observational study from clinical pharmacists’ consultation experience

BACKGROUND: The use of empirical anti-infective medication calls for the identification of common pathogens and accurate infectious biomarkers. However, clinical pharmacists’ anti-infective experience in the field of obstetrics and gynaecology is rare in the literature. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the correlation between the anti-infective effectiveness after 7 days of antibiotic treatment and infectious biomarkers, according to clinical pharmacists’ consultation cases of gynecological and obstetric infections. METHODS: In this retrospective study, clinical pharmacists’ anti-infective consultation experiences applied by physicians from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, were included. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the patient died or left the hospital before undergoing an effectiveness evaluation after the consultation; (2) treatment was discontinued due to adverse reactions related to antibiotics; (3) the patient did not undergo an effectiveness evaluation within 3 or 7 days after application of the clinical pharmacist’s treatment plan; and (4) the physician did not adopt the clinical pharmacist’s suggestions. The registered information included patient characteristics, pathological bacteria, anti-infective medication and changes in infection indices before and after treatment. Statistical analysis of temperature, white blood cells (WBCs), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and WBCs in urine after 3 days and 7 days of anti-infective treatment, compared with before anti-infective treatment, was performed by the chi-square test. A t test was conducted to further study WBC count and CRP. A receiver operating characteristic curve verified the sensitivity and specificity of WBC count, CRP and PCT. RESULTS: A total of 265 cases were included. The CRP levels of patients 3 d and 7 d after antibiotic treatment were significantly lower than before antibiotic treatment (P < 0.05, P < 0.01), while the WBC count showed a downward trend after 3 days and a significant decrease after 7 days (P < 0.01). The areas under the curve (AUCs) for prognosis on the 7th day for WBC count, CRP and PCT were 0.90, 0.75 and 0.522, respectively. The AUC for WBC count combined with CRP was 0.90, which was higher than that for the biomarkers tested separately, especially compared to PCT. The most common gynecological infections were surgical site infection (SSI), urinary tract infection and fever of unknown origin, and the most common pathogens were E. coli and E. faecalis in Gram-negative and Gram-positive samples, respectively. Pharmacists’ recommended treatment plans included carbapenems and β-lactam antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Our dual-center study indicates that the combination of WBC count and CRP can improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency, and PCT alone is insensitive to gynecological infections, according to clinical pharmacists’ experience.