Cargando…
Micturition in the toilet compared with bedpan in laboring Nulliparas: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Bladder overdistension in labor may lead to prolonged postpartum urinary retention. We hypothesized that nulliparas mobilizing to toilet is more likely to achieve satisfactory micturition. METHODS: One hundred sixteen (58 in each arm) term nulliparas in labor with filled bladders were ra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05162-4 |
_version_ | 1784824652470681600 |
---|---|
author | Kamarudin, Maherah Chong, Wen Kiat Hamdan, Mukhri Adlan, Aizura Syafinaz Saaid, Rahmah Tan, Peng Chiong |
author_facet | Kamarudin, Maherah Chong, Wen Kiat Hamdan, Mukhri Adlan, Aizura Syafinaz Saaid, Rahmah Tan, Peng Chiong |
author_sort | Kamarudin, Maherah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bladder overdistension in labor may lead to prolonged postpartum urinary retention. We hypothesized that nulliparas mobilizing to toilet is more likely to achieve satisfactory micturition. METHODS: One hundred sixteen (58 in each arm) term nulliparas in labor with filled bladders were randomized to mobilizing to the toilet or using bedpan to micturate. Primary outcome was satisfactory micturition defined as ultrasound derived post-void bladder volume < 150 ml. Following unsatisfactory micturition, participants crossover to the opposed intervention. Participants were catheterized if after crossover, residual bladder volume was ≥250 ml. RESULTS: Satisfactory micturition rates were 55/58 (95%) vs. 43/58 (74%) RR 1.28 95%CI 1.08–1.51 NNT(b) 4.8 95%CI 3.0–12.4 P = 0.008, failure to micturate 1/58 (2%) vs. 8/58 (14%) RR 0.13 95%CI 0.02–0.97 NNT(b) 8.3 95%CI 4.6–38.7 P = 0.047. After cross over following unsatisfactory bladder voiding, satisfactory micturition rates were 0/3 (0%) vs 13/15 (87%) P = 0.024, bladder catheterization rates were 3/58 (5%) vs. 2/58 (4%) RR 95%CI 1.5 (0.26–8.65) P = 0.648, maternal satisfaction with allocated intervention 55/58 (95%) vs. 9/58 (16%) RR 95%CI 6.1 (3.3–11.2) NNT(b) 95%CI 1.3 (1.1–1.5) P < 0.0001 and preference for mobilizing to the toilet if micturition was needed again during labor 55/58 (95%) vs. 53/58 (92%) for mobilizing to the toilet compared to bedpan use arms respectively. Labor and neonatal outcomes were similar. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory micturition was more frequently achieved with mobilization to the toilet than bedpan use. Women in both arms overwhelmingly prefer to mobilize to the toilet to urinate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ISRCTN on 17/07/2019 with trial identification number: ISRCTN17787339. First participant was recruited on 31/07/2019. The last patient was recruited on 18/12/2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05162-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9635173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96351732022-11-05 Micturition in the toilet compared with bedpan in laboring Nulliparas: a randomized controlled trial Kamarudin, Maherah Chong, Wen Kiat Hamdan, Mukhri Adlan, Aizura Syafinaz Saaid, Rahmah Tan, Peng Chiong BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Bladder overdistension in labor may lead to prolonged postpartum urinary retention. We hypothesized that nulliparas mobilizing to toilet is more likely to achieve satisfactory micturition. METHODS: One hundred sixteen (58 in each arm) term nulliparas in labor with filled bladders were randomized to mobilizing to the toilet or using bedpan to micturate. Primary outcome was satisfactory micturition defined as ultrasound derived post-void bladder volume < 150 ml. Following unsatisfactory micturition, participants crossover to the opposed intervention. Participants were catheterized if after crossover, residual bladder volume was ≥250 ml. RESULTS: Satisfactory micturition rates were 55/58 (95%) vs. 43/58 (74%) RR 1.28 95%CI 1.08–1.51 NNT(b) 4.8 95%CI 3.0–12.4 P = 0.008, failure to micturate 1/58 (2%) vs. 8/58 (14%) RR 0.13 95%CI 0.02–0.97 NNT(b) 8.3 95%CI 4.6–38.7 P = 0.047. After cross over following unsatisfactory bladder voiding, satisfactory micturition rates were 0/3 (0%) vs 13/15 (87%) P = 0.024, bladder catheterization rates were 3/58 (5%) vs. 2/58 (4%) RR 95%CI 1.5 (0.26–8.65) P = 0.648, maternal satisfaction with allocated intervention 55/58 (95%) vs. 9/58 (16%) RR 95%CI 6.1 (3.3–11.2) NNT(b) 95%CI 1.3 (1.1–1.5) P < 0.0001 and preference for mobilizing to the toilet if micturition was needed again during labor 55/58 (95%) vs. 53/58 (92%) for mobilizing to the toilet compared to bedpan use arms respectively. Labor and neonatal outcomes were similar. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory micturition was more frequently achieved with mobilization to the toilet than bedpan use. Women in both arms overwhelmingly prefer to mobilize to the toilet to urinate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ISRCTN on 17/07/2019 with trial identification number: ISRCTN17787339. First participant was recruited on 31/07/2019. The last patient was recruited on 18/12/2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05162-4. BioMed Central 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9635173/ /pubmed/36333791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05162-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kamarudin, Maherah Chong, Wen Kiat Hamdan, Mukhri Adlan, Aizura Syafinaz Saaid, Rahmah Tan, Peng Chiong Micturition in the toilet compared with bedpan in laboring Nulliparas: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Micturition in the toilet compared with bedpan in laboring Nulliparas: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Micturition in the toilet compared with bedpan in laboring Nulliparas: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Micturition in the toilet compared with bedpan in laboring Nulliparas: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Micturition in the toilet compared with bedpan in laboring Nulliparas: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Micturition in the toilet compared with bedpan in laboring Nulliparas: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | micturition in the toilet compared with bedpan in laboring nulliparas: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05162-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kamarudinmaherah micturitioninthetoiletcomparedwithbedpaninlaboringnulliparasarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chongwenkiat micturitioninthetoiletcomparedwithbedpaninlaboringnulliparasarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hamdanmukhri micturitioninthetoiletcomparedwithbedpaninlaboringnulliparasarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT adlanaizurasyafinaz micturitioninthetoiletcomparedwithbedpaninlaboringnulliparasarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT saaidrahmah micturitioninthetoiletcomparedwithbedpaninlaboringnulliparasarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tanpengchiong micturitioninthetoiletcomparedwithbedpaninlaboringnulliparasarandomizedcontrolledtrial |