Cargando…

Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study

OBJECTIVE: To analyse and compare the biomechanical differences between 3D-printed prostheses, titanium mesh cages and poorly matched titanium mesh cages in total en bloc spondylectomy (TES). METHODS: The finite element model of T10-L2 for healthy adults was modified to make three models after T12 t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Hanpeng, Wang, Xiaodong, Han, Ye, Jiang, Yuanyuan, Wang, Jianzhong, Zhang, Xiong, Miao, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05919-0
_version_ 1784824659064127488
author Xu, Hanpeng
Wang, Xiaodong
Han, Ye
Jiang, Yuanyuan
Wang, Jianzhong
Zhang, Xiong
Miao, Jun
author_facet Xu, Hanpeng
Wang, Xiaodong
Han, Ye
Jiang, Yuanyuan
Wang, Jianzhong
Zhang, Xiong
Miao, Jun
author_sort Xu, Hanpeng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyse and compare the biomechanical differences between 3D-printed prostheses, titanium mesh cages and poorly matched titanium mesh cages in total en bloc spondylectomy (TES). METHODS: The finite element model of T10-L2 for healthy adults was modified to make three models after T12 total spondylectomy. These models were a 3D-printed prosthesis, titanium mesh cage and prosthesis-endplate mismatched titanium mesh cage for reconstruction. The range of motion (ROM), stress distribution of the endplate and internal fixation system of three models in flexion and extension, lateral bending and axial rotation were simulated and analysed by ABAQUS. RESULT: In flexion, due to the support of the anterior prosthesis, the fixation system showed the maximum fixation strength. The fixation strength of the 3D-printed prosthesis model was 26.73 N·m /°, that of the TMC support model was 27.20 N·m /°, and that of the poorly matched TMC model was 24.16 N·m /°. In flexion, the L1 upper endplate stress of the poorly matched TMC model was 35.5% and 49.6% higher than that of the TMC and 3D-printed prosthesis, respectively. It was 17% and 28.1% higher in extension, 39.3% and 42.5% higher in lateral bending, and 82.9% and 91.2% higher in axial rotation, respectively. The lower endplate of T11 showed a similar trend, but the magnitude of the stress change was reduced. In the stress analysis of the 3D-printed prosthesis and TMC, it was found that the maximum stress was in flexion and axial rotation, followed by left and right bending, and the least stress was in extension. However, the mismatched TMC withstood the maximum von Mises stress of 418.7 MPa (almost twice as much as the buckling state) in rotation, 3 times and 5.83 times in extension, and 1.29 and 2.85 times in lateral bending, respectively. CONCLUSION: Different prostheses with good endplate matching after total spondylectomy can obtain effective postoperative stable support, and the reduction in contact area caused by mismatch will affect the biomechanical properties and increase the probability of internal fixation failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9635202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96352022022-11-05 Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study Xu, Hanpeng Wang, Xiaodong Han, Ye Jiang, Yuanyuan Wang, Jianzhong Zhang, Xiong Miao, Jun BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research OBJECTIVE: To analyse and compare the biomechanical differences between 3D-printed prostheses, titanium mesh cages and poorly matched titanium mesh cages in total en bloc spondylectomy (TES). METHODS: The finite element model of T10-L2 for healthy adults was modified to make three models after T12 total spondylectomy. These models were a 3D-printed prosthesis, titanium mesh cage and prosthesis-endplate mismatched titanium mesh cage for reconstruction. The range of motion (ROM), stress distribution of the endplate and internal fixation system of three models in flexion and extension, lateral bending and axial rotation were simulated and analysed by ABAQUS. RESULT: In flexion, due to the support of the anterior prosthesis, the fixation system showed the maximum fixation strength. The fixation strength of the 3D-printed prosthesis model was 26.73 N·m /°, that of the TMC support model was 27.20 N·m /°, and that of the poorly matched TMC model was 24.16 N·m /°. In flexion, the L1 upper endplate stress of the poorly matched TMC model was 35.5% and 49.6% higher than that of the TMC and 3D-printed prosthesis, respectively. It was 17% and 28.1% higher in extension, 39.3% and 42.5% higher in lateral bending, and 82.9% and 91.2% higher in axial rotation, respectively. The lower endplate of T11 showed a similar trend, but the magnitude of the stress change was reduced. In the stress analysis of the 3D-printed prosthesis and TMC, it was found that the maximum stress was in flexion and axial rotation, followed by left and right bending, and the least stress was in extension. However, the mismatched TMC withstood the maximum von Mises stress of 418.7 MPa (almost twice as much as the buckling state) in rotation, 3 times and 5.83 times in extension, and 1.29 and 2.85 times in lateral bending, respectively. CONCLUSION: Different prostheses with good endplate matching after total spondylectomy can obtain effective postoperative stable support, and the reduction in contact area caused by mismatch will affect the biomechanical properties and increase the probability of internal fixation failure. BioMed Central 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9635202/ /pubmed/36329424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05919-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Xu, Hanpeng
Wang, Xiaodong
Han, Ye
Jiang, Yuanyuan
Wang, Jianzhong
Zhang, Xiong
Miao, Jun
Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study
title Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study
title_full Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study
title_short Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study
title_sort biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05919-0
work_keys_str_mv AT xuhanpeng biomechanicalcomparisonofdifferentprostheticreconstructionsintotalenblocspondylectomyafiniteelementstudy
AT wangxiaodong biomechanicalcomparisonofdifferentprostheticreconstructionsintotalenblocspondylectomyafiniteelementstudy
AT hanye biomechanicalcomparisonofdifferentprostheticreconstructionsintotalenblocspondylectomyafiniteelementstudy
AT jiangyuanyuan biomechanicalcomparisonofdifferentprostheticreconstructionsintotalenblocspondylectomyafiniteelementstudy
AT wangjianzhong biomechanicalcomparisonofdifferentprostheticreconstructionsintotalenblocspondylectomyafiniteelementstudy
AT zhangxiong biomechanicalcomparisonofdifferentprostheticreconstructionsintotalenblocspondylectomyafiniteelementstudy
AT miaojun biomechanicalcomparisonofdifferentprostheticreconstructionsintotalenblocspondylectomyafiniteelementstudy