Cargando…
Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden?
Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is an implantable technology approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and intended for heart failure patients without a cardiac resynchronization therapy indication. CCM leads to reduced heart failure hospitalizations and improvements in exercise toler...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MediaSphere Medical
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605296 http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2022.13104 |
_version_ | 1784824737834205184 |
---|---|
author | Shin, Jae Wook Atoot, Rami Heyer, Marissa Jamal, Sameer |
author_facet | Shin, Jae Wook Atoot, Rami Heyer, Marissa Jamal, Sameer |
author_sort | Shin, Jae Wook |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is an implantable technology approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and intended for heart failure patients without a cardiac resynchronization therapy indication. CCM leads to reduced heart failure hospitalizations and improvements in exercise tolerance and quality of life. There are a lack of data examining the impact of CCM therapy on atrial fibrillation (AF) burden. We report the case of a 65-year-old man with a history of paroxysmal AF, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and carotid artery stenosis who presented with newly diagnosed ischemic cardiomyopathy with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20%–25%. He underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery for triple vessel disease with an improvement in LVEF to 40% after 4 months of guideline-directed medical therapy. Due to clinical heart failure and paroxysms of AF, he underwent CCM device and implantable loop recorder (ILR) implantation. His LVEF improved to 60%, and the ILR showed no AF. We postulate multiple mechanisms to explain the negligible burden of AF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9635568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MediaSphere Medical |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96355682023-01-04 Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden? Shin, Jae Wook Atoot, Rami Heyer, Marissa Jamal, Sameer J Innov Card Rhythm Manag Case Report Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is an implantable technology approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and intended for heart failure patients without a cardiac resynchronization therapy indication. CCM leads to reduced heart failure hospitalizations and improvements in exercise tolerance and quality of life. There are a lack of data examining the impact of CCM therapy on atrial fibrillation (AF) burden. We report the case of a 65-year-old man with a history of paroxysmal AF, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and carotid artery stenosis who presented with newly diagnosed ischemic cardiomyopathy with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20%–25%. He underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery for triple vessel disease with an improvement in LVEF to 40% after 4 months of guideline-directed medical therapy. Due to clinical heart failure and paroxysms of AF, he underwent CCM device and implantable loop recorder (ILR) implantation. His LVEF improved to 60%, and the ILR showed no AF. We postulate multiple mechanisms to explain the negligible burden of AF. MediaSphere Medical 2022-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9635568/ /pubmed/36605296 http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2022.13104 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Shin, Jae Wook Atoot, Rami Heyer, Marissa Jamal, Sameer Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden? |
title | Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden? |
title_full | Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden? |
title_fullStr | Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden? |
title_short | Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden? |
title_sort | does cardiac contractility modulation therapy reduce atrial fibrillation burden? |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605296 http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2022.13104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shinjaewook doescardiaccontractilitymodulationtherapyreduceatrialfibrillationburden AT atootrami doescardiaccontractilitymodulationtherapyreduceatrialfibrillationburden AT heyermarissa doescardiaccontractilitymodulationtherapyreduceatrialfibrillationburden AT jamalsameer doescardiaccontractilitymodulationtherapyreduceatrialfibrillationburden |