Cargando…

Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden?

Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is an implantable technology approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and intended for heart failure patients without a cardiac resynchronization therapy indication. CCM leads to reduced heart failure hospitalizations and improvements in exercise toler...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Jae Wook, Atoot, Rami, Heyer, Marissa, Jamal, Sameer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MediaSphere Medical 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605296
http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2022.13104
_version_ 1784824737834205184
author Shin, Jae Wook
Atoot, Rami
Heyer, Marissa
Jamal, Sameer
author_facet Shin, Jae Wook
Atoot, Rami
Heyer, Marissa
Jamal, Sameer
author_sort Shin, Jae Wook
collection PubMed
description Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is an implantable technology approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and intended for heart failure patients without a cardiac resynchronization therapy indication. CCM leads to reduced heart failure hospitalizations and improvements in exercise tolerance and quality of life. There are a lack of data examining the impact of CCM therapy on atrial fibrillation (AF) burden. We report the case of a 65-year-old man with a history of paroxysmal AF, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and carotid artery stenosis who presented with newly diagnosed ischemic cardiomyopathy with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20%–25%. He underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery for triple vessel disease with an improvement in LVEF to 40% after 4 months of guideline-directed medical therapy. Due to clinical heart failure and paroxysms of AF, he underwent CCM device and implantable loop recorder (ILR) implantation. His LVEF improved to 60%, and the ILR showed no AF. We postulate multiple mechanisms to explain the negligible burden of AF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9635568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MediaSphere Medical
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96355682023-01-04 Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden? Shin, Jae Wook Atoot, Rami Heyer, Marissa Jamal, Sameer J Innov Card Rhythm Manag Case Report Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is an implantable technology approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and intended for heart failure patients without a cardiac resynchronization therapy indication. CCM leads to reduced heart failure hospitalizations and improvements in exercise tolerance and quality of life. There are a lack of data examining the impact of CCM therapy on atrial fibrillation (AF) burden. We report the case of a 65-year-old man with a history of paroxysmal AF, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and carotid artery stenosis who presented with newly diagnosed ischemic cardiomyopathy with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20%–25%. He underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery for triple vessel disease with an improvement in LVEF to 40% after 4 months of guideline-directed medical therapy. Due to clinical heart failure and paroxysms of AF, he underwent CCM device and implantable loop recorder (ILR) implantation. His LVEF improved to 60%, and the ILR showed no AF. We postulate multiple mechanisms to explain the negligible burden of AF. MediaSphere Medical 2022-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9635568/ /pubmed/36605296 http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2022.13104 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Shin, Jae Wook
Atoot, Rami
Heyer, Marissa
Jamal, Sameer
Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden?
title Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden?
title_full Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden?
title_fullStr Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden?
title_full_unstemmed Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden?
title_short Does Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden?
title_sort does cardiac contractility modulation therapy reduce atrial fibrillation burden?
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605296
http://dx.doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2022.13104
work_keys_str_mv AT shinjaewook doescardiaccontractilitymodulationtherapyreduceatrialfibrillationburden
AT atootrami doescardiaccontractilitymodulationtherapyreduceatrialfibrillationburden
AT heyermarissa doescardiaccontractilitymodulationtherapyreduceatrialfibrillationburden
AT jamalsameer doescardiaccontractilitymodulationtherapyreduceatrialfibrillationburden