Cargando…

Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2019

RESEARCH QUESTION: What was the utilization, effectiveness and safety of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Latin America during 2019? DESIGN: This was a retrospective collection of multinational data on ART performed at 196 institutions from 15 countries. RESULTS: A total of 106,918 initiate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando, Crosby, Javier A., Musri, Carolina, de Souza, Maria do Carmo Borges, Martinez, A. Gustavo, Silva, Adelino Amaral, Mojarra, José María, Masoli, Diego, Posada, Natalia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36098475
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220034
_version_ 1784824744622686208
author Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando
Crosby, Javier A.
Musri, Carolina
de Souza, Maria do Carmo Borges
Martinez, A. Gustavo
Silva, Adelino Amaral
Mojarra, José María
Masoli, Diego
Posada, Natalia
author_facet Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando
Crosby, Javier A.
Musri, Carolina
de Souza, Maria do Carmo Borges
Martinez, A. Gustavo
Silva, Adelino Amaral
Mojarra, José María
Masoli, Diego
Posada, Natalia
author_sort Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando
collection PubMed
description RESEARCH QUESTION: What was the utilization, effectiveness and safety of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Latin America during 2019? DESIGN: This was a retrospective collection of multinational data on ART performed at 196 institutions from 15 countries. RESULTS: A total of 106,918 initiated cycles, 18,133 deliveries and 21,096 births were reported. ART utilization was 24-558 cycles per million inhabitants. Women aged ≥40 years represented 32.9% of fresh IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. After removing freeze-all cycles, the delivery rate per oocyte retrieval was 17.3% for ICSI and 19.5% for IVF. Overall, single-embryo transfer (SET) represented 36.2% of fresh transfers, with a 19.5% delivery rate per transfer, increasing to 30.7% for elective SET and 32.7% for blastocyst elective SET (eSET). The delivery rate for double-embryo transfers (DET) was 27.8%, increasing to 37.1% after elective DET. This 6.4% increment in deliveries between eSET and elective DET resulted in a 12-fold increase in twin births. Furthermore, overall perinatal mortality was more than two-fold higher for twin compared with singleton deliveries. The delivery rate for frozen-thawed SET reached 28.1%, most being blastocyst transfers. Of all births, 72.3% were singletons, 26.4% twins and 1.3% triplets and higher multiples. Preterm deliveries reached 14.3% for singletons and 58.1% for twins. Perinatal mortality was 7.4‰ in singletons, 17.2‰ for twins and 62.9‰ for triplets or higher. CONCLUSIONS: The number of initiated cycles has slowly increased in countries with laws or regulations facilitating access. FET cycles predominate and blastocyst SET are also increasing. The data show that, especially in young women and oocyte recipients, when there is more than one blastocyst for transfer, eSET should be the rule.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9635608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96356082022-11-07 Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2019 Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando Crosby, Javier A. Musri, Carolina de Souza, Maria do Carmo Borges Martinez, A. Gustavo Silva, Adelino Amaral Mojarra, José María Masoli, Diego Posada, Natalia JBRA Assist Reprod REDLara Pages RESEARCH QUESTION: What was the utilization, effectiveness and safety of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Latin America during 2019? DESIGN: This was a retrospective collection of multinational data on ART performed at 196 institutions from 15 countries. RESULTS: A total of 106,918 initiated cycles, 18,133 deliveries and 21,096 births were reported. ART utilization was 24-558 cycles per million inhabitants. Women aged ≥40 years represented 32.9% of fresh IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. After removing freeze-all cycles, the delivery rate per oocyte retrieval was 17.3% for ICSI and 19.5% for IVF. Overall, single-embryo transfer (SET) represented 36.2% of fresh transfers, with a 19.5% delivery rate per transfer, increasing to 30.7% for elective SET and 32.7% for blastocyst elective SET (eSET). The delivery rate for double-embryo transfers (DET) was 27.8%, increasing to 37.1% after elective DET. This 6.4% increment in deliveries between eSET and elective DET resulted in a 12-fold increase in twin births. Furthermore, overall perinatal mortality was more than two-fold higher for twin compared with singleton deliveries. The delivery rate for frozen-thawed SET reached 28.1%, most being blastocyst transfers. Of all births, 72.3% were singletons, 26.4% twins and 1.3% triplets and higher multiples. Preterm deliveries reached 14.3% for singletons and 58.1% for twins. Perinatal mortality was 7.4‰ in singletons, 17.2‰ for twins and 62.9‰ for triplets or higher. CONCLUSIONS: The number of initiated cycles has slowly increased in countries with laws or regulations facilitating access. FET cycles predominate and blastocyst SET are also increasing. The data show that, especially in young women and oocyte recipients, when there is more than one blastocyst for transfer, eSET should be the rule. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9635608/ /pubmed/36098475 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220034 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle REDLara Pages
Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando
Crosby, Javier A.
Musri, Carolina
de Souza, Maria do Carmo Borges
Martinez, A. Gustavo
Silva, Adelino Amaral
Mojarra, José María
Masoli, Diego
Posada, Natalia
Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2019
title Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2019
title_full Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2019
title_fullStr Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2019
title_full_unstemmed Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2019
title_short Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2019
title_sort assisted reproductive technologies in latin america: the latin american registry, 2019
topic REDLara Pages
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36098475
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220034
work_keys_str_mv AT zegershochschildfernando assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019
AT crosbyjaviera assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019
AT musricarolina assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019
AT desouzamariadocarmoborges assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019
AT martinezagustavo assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019
AT silvaadelinoamaral assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019
AT mojarrajosemaria assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019
AT masolidiego assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019
AT posadanatalia assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019
AT assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019