Cargando…
Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2019
RESEARCH QUESTION: What was the utilization, effectiveness and safety of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Latin America during 2019? DESIGN: This was a retrospective collection of multinational data on ART performed at 196 institutions from 15 countries. RESULTS: A total of 106,918 initiate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36098475 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220034 |
_version_ | 1784824744622686208 |
---|---|
author | Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando Crosby, Javier A. Musri, Carolina de Souza, Maria do Carmo Borges Martinez, A. Gustavo Silva, Adelino Amaral Mojarra, José María Masoli, Diego Posada, Natalia |
author_facet | Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando Crosby, Javier A. Musri, Carolina de Souza, Maria do Carmo Borges Martinez, A. Gustavo Silva, Adelino Amaral Mojarra, José María Masoli, Diego Posada, Natalia |
author_sort | Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando |
collection | PubMed |
description | RESEARCH QUESTION: What was the utilization, effectiveness and safety of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Latin America during 2019? DESIGN: This was a retrospective collection of multinational data on ART performed at 196 institutions from 15 countries. RESULTS: A total of 106,918 initiated cycles, 18,133 deliveries and 21,096 births were reported. ART utilization was 24-558 cycles per million inhabitants. Women aged ≥40 years represented 32.9% of fresh IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. After removing freeze-all cycles, the delivery rate per oocyte retrieval was 17.3% for ICSI and 19.5% for IVF. Overall, single-embryo transfer (SET) represented 36.2% of fresh transfers, with a 19.5% delivery rate per transfer, increasing to 30.7% for elective SET and 32.7% for blastocyst elective SET (eSET). The delivery rate for double-embryo transfers (DET) was 27.8%, increasing to 37.1% after elective DET. This 6.4% increment in deliveries between eSET and elective DET resulted in a 12-fold increase in twin births. Furthermore, overall perinatal mortality was more than two-fold higher for twin compared with singleton deliveries. The delivery rate for frozen-thawed SET reached 28.1%, most being blastocyst transfers. Of all births, 72.3% were singletons, 26.4% twins and 1.3% triplets and higher multiples. Preterm deliveries reached 14.3% for singletons and 58.1% for twins. Perinatal mortality was 7.4‰ in singletons, 17.2‰ for twins and 62.9‰ for triplets or higher. CONCLUSIONS: The number of initiated cycles has slowly increased in countries with laws or regulations facilitating access. FET cycles predominate and blastocyst SET are also increasing. The data show that, especially in young women and oocyte recipients, when there is more than one blastocyst for transfer, eSET should be the rule. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9635608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96356082022-11-07 Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2019 Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando Crosby, Javier A. Musri, Carolina de Souza, Maria do Carmo Borges Martinez, A. Gustavo Silva, Adelino Amaral Mojarra, José María Masoli, Diego Posada, Natalia JBRA Assist Reprod REDLara Pages RESEARCH QUESTION: What was the utilization, effectiveness and safety of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Latin America during 2019? DESIGN: This was a retrospective collection of multinational data on ART performed at 196 institutions from 15 countries. RESULTS: A total of 106,918 initiated cycles, 18,133 deliveries and 21,096 births were reported. ART utilization was 24-558 cycles per million inhabitants. Women aged ≥40 years represented 32.9% of fresh IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. After removing freeze-all cycles, the delivery rate per oocyte retrieval was 17.3% for ICSI and 19.5% for IVF. Overall, single-embryo transfer (SET) represented 36.2% of fresh transfers, with a 19.5% delivery rate per transfer, increasing to 30.7% for elective SET and 32.7% for blastocyst elective SET (eSET). The delivery rate for double-embryo transfers (DET) was 27.8%, increasing to 37.1% after elective DET. This 6.4% increment in deliveries between eSET and elective DET resulted in a 12-fold increase in twin births. Furthermore, overall perinatal mortality was more than two-fold higher for twin compared with singleton deliveries. The delivery rate for frozen-thawed SET reached 28.1%, most being blastocyst transfers. Of all births, 72.3% were singletons, 26.4% twins and 1.3% triplets and higher multiples. Preterm deliveries reached 14.3% for singletons and 58.1% for twins. Perinatal mortality was 7.4‰ in singletons, 17.2‰ for twins and 62.9‰ for triplets or higher. CONCLUSIONS: The number of initiated cycles has slowly increased in countries with laws or regulations facilitating access. FET cycles predominate and blastocyst SET are also increasing. The data show that, especially in young women and oocyte recipients, when there is more than one blastocyst for transfer, eSET should be the rule. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9635608/ /pubmed/36098475 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220034 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | REDLara Pages Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando Crosby, Javier A. Musri, Carolina de Souza, Maria do Carmo Borges Martinez, A. Gustavo Silva, Adelino Amaral Mojarra, José María Masoli, Diego Posada, Natalia Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2019 |
title | Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin
American Registry, 2019 |
title_full | Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin
American Registry, 2019 |
title_fullStr | Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin
American Registry, 2019 |
title_full_unstemmed | Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin
American Registry, 2019 |
title_short | Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin
American Registry, 2019 |
title_sort | assisted reproductive technologies in latin america: the latin
american registry, 2019 |
topic | REDLara Pages |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36098475 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zegershochschildfernando assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019 AT crosbyjaviera assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019 AT musricarolina assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019 AT desouzamariadocarmoborges assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019 AT martinezagustavo assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019 AT silvaadelinoamaral assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019 AT mojarrajosemaria assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019 AT masolidiego assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019 AT posadanatalia assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019 AT assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericathelatinamericanregistry2019 |