Cargando…

The application of resilience assessment grid in healthcare: A scoping review

BACKGROUND: The Resilience Assessment Grid (RAG) has attracted increasing interest in recent healthcare discourse as an instrument to understand and measure the resilience performance of socio-technical systems. Despite its growing popularity in healthcare, its applicability and utility remain uncle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Safi, Mariam, Thude, Bettina Ravnborg, Brandt, Frans, Clay-Williams, Robyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36331952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277289
_version_ 1784824777536438272
author Safi, Mariam
Thude, Bettina Ravnborg
Brandt, Frans
Clay-Williams, Robyn
author_facet Safi, Mariam
Thude, Bettina Ravnborg
Brandt, Frans
Clay-Williams, Robyn
author_sort Safi, Mariam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Resilience Assessment Grid (RAG) has attracted increasing interest in recent healthcare discourse as an instrument to understand and measure the resilience performance of socio-technical systems. Despite its growing popularity in healthcare, its applicability and utility remain unclear. This scoping review aims to understand the practical application of RAG method and its outcomes in healthcare. METHOD: We followed the Arksey and O’Malley, and the Levac and colleagues’ framework for scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. We conducted searches of three electronic databases [Medline, Embase and Web of Science] in May 2021. Supplementary searches included Google Scholar, web and citation searches, and hand searches of the nine seminal edited books on Resilience Engineering and Resilient Health Care. All English language, empirical studies of RAG application in the healthcare setting were included. Open Science Framework [Registration-DOI. 10.17605/OSF.IO/GTCZ3]. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Diversities were found across study designs and methodologies. Qualitative designs and literature reviews were most frequently used to develop the RAG and applied it in practice. Eight of the studies had qualitative designs, three studies had mixed-methods designs and one study had a quantitative design. All studies reported that the RAG was very helpful for understanding how frontline healthcare professionals manage the complexity of everyday work. While the studies gained insights from applying the RAG to analyze organizational resilience and identify areas for improvement, it was unclear how suggestions were implemented and how they contributed to quality improvement. CONCLUSION: The RAG is a promising tool to manage some of the current and future challenges of the healthcare system. To realise the potential benefits of the RAG, it is important that we move beyond the development phase of the RAG tool and use it to guide implementation and management of quality initiatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9635744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96357442022-11-05 The application of resilience assessment grid in healthcare: A scoping review Safi, Mariam Thude, Bettina Ravnborg Brandt, Frans Clay-Williams, Robyn PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Resilience Assessment Grid (RAG) has attracted increasing interest in recent healthcare discourse as an instrument to understand and measure the resilience performance of socio-technical systems. Despite its growing popularity in healthcare, its applicability and utility remain unclear. This scoping review aims to understand the practical application of RAG method and its outcomes in healthcare. METHOD: We followed the Arksey and O’Malley, and the Levac and colleagues’ framework for scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. We conducted searches of three electronic databases [Medline, Embase and Web of Science] in May 2021. Supplementary searches included Google Scholar, web and citation searches, and hand searches of the nine seminal edited books on Resilience Engineering and Resilient Health Care. All English language, empirical studies of RAG application in the healthcare setting were included. Open Science Framework [Registration-DOI. 10.17605/OSF.IO/GTCZ3]. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Diversities were found across study designs and methodologies. Qualitative designs and literature reviews were most frequently used to develop the RAG and applied it in practice. Eight of the studies had qualitative designs, three studies had mixed-methods designs and one study had a quantitative design. All studies reported that the RAG was very helpful for understanding how frontline healthcare professionals manage the complexity of everyday work. While the studies gained insights from applying the RAG to analyze organizational resilience and identify areas for improvement, it was unclear how suggestions were implemented and how they contributed to quality improvement. CONCLUSION: The RAG is a promising tool to manage some of the current and future challenges of the healthcare system. To realise the potential benefits of the RAG, it is important that we move beyond the development phase of the RAG tool and use it to guide implementation and management of quality initiatives. Public Library of Science 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9635744/ /pubmed/36331952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277289 Text en © 2022 Safi et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Safi, Mariam
Thude, Bettina Ravnborg
Brandt, Frans
Clay-Williams, Robyn
The application of resilience assessment grid in healthcare: A scoping review
title The application of resilience assessment grid in healthcare: A scoping review
title_full The application of resilience assessment grid in healthcare: A scoping review
title_fullStr The application of resilience assessment grid in healthcare: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The application of resilience assessment grid in healthcare: A scoping review
title_short The application of resilience assessment grid in healthcare: A scoping review
title_sort application of resilience assessment grid in healthcare: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36331952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277289
work_keys_str_mv AT safimariam theapplicationofresilienceassessmentgridinhealthcareascopingreview
AT thudebettinaravnborg theapplicationofresilienceassessmentgridinhealthcareascopingreview
AT brandtfrans theapplicationofresilienceassessmentgridinhealthcareascopingreview
AT claywilliamsrobyn theapplicationofresilienceassessmentgridinhealthcareascopingreview
AT safimariam applicationofresilienceassessmentgridinhealthcareascopingreview
AT thudebettinaravnborg applicationofresilienceassessmentgridinhealthcareascopingreview
AT brandtfrans applicationofresilienceassessmentgridinhealthcareascopingreview
AT claywilliamsrobyn applicationofresilienceassessmentgridinhealthcareascopingreview